正畸托槽瓷表面调理方案与剪切粘结强度。

Q Medicine
Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2016-05-01
Ashley M Lestrade, Richard W Ballard, Xiaoming Xu, Qingzhao Yu, Edwin L Kee, Paul C Armbruster
{"title":"正畸托槽瓷表面调理方案与剪切粘结强度。","authors":"Ashley M Lestrade,&nbsp;Richard W Ballard,&nbsp;Xiaoming Xu,&nbsp;Qingzhao Yu,&nbsp;Edwin L Kee,&nbsp;Paul C Armbruster","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the present study was to determine which of six bonding protocols yielded a clinically acceptable shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate porcelain restorations. A secondary aim was to determine which bonding protocol produced the least surface damage at debond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty lithium disilicate samples were fabricated to replicate the facial surface of a mandibular first molar using a CEREC CAD/CAM machine. The samples were split into six test groups, each of which received different mechanical/chemical pretreatment protocols to roughen the porcelain surface prior to bonding a molar orthodontic attachment. Shear bond strength testing was conducted using an Instron machine. The mean, maximum, minimal, and standard deviation SBS values for each sample group including an enamel control were calculated. A t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in SBS values, with the exception of surface roughening with a green stone prior to HFA and silane treatment. This protocol yielded slightly higher bond strength which was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chemical treatment alone with HFA/silane yielded SBS values within an acceptable clinical range to withstand forces applied by orthodontic treatment and potentially eliminates the need to mechanically roughen the ceramic surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Porcelain surface conditioning protocols and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley M Lestrade,&nbsp;Richard W Ballard,&nbsp;Xiaoming Xu,&nbsp;Qingzhao Yu,&nbsp;Edwin L Kee,&nbsp;Paul C Armbruster\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the present study was to determine which of six bonding protocols yielded a clinically acceptable shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate porcelain restorations. A secondary aim was to determine which bonding protocol produced the least surface damage at debond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty lithium disilicate samples were fabricated to replicate the facial surface of a mandibular first molar using a CEREC CAD/CAM machine. The samples were split into six test groups, each of which received different mechanical/chemical pretreatment protocols to roughen the porcelain surface prior to bonding a molar orthodontic attachment. Shear bond strength testing was conducted using an Instron machine. The mean, maximum, minimal, and standard deviation SBS values for each sample group including an enamel control were calculated. A t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in SBS values, with the exception of surface roughening with a green stone prior to HFA and silane treatment. This protocol yielded slightly higher bond strength which was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chemical treatment alone with HFA/silane yielded SBS values within an acceptable clinical range to withstand forces applied by orthodontic treatment and potentially eliminates the need to mechanically roughen the ceramic surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"18-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定六种结合方案中哪一种对CAD/CAM二硅酸锂瓷修复体的金属正畸托槽产生临床可接受的剪切结合强度(SBS)。第二个目的是确定哪种键合方案在脱粘处产生最小的表面损伤。方法:在CEREC CAD/CAM机器上制作60个二硅酸锂样品来复制下颌第一磨牙的表面。样品被分为六个测试组,每个测试组都接受不同的机械/化学预处理方案,以使瓷表面变得粗糙,然后再粘合磨牙正畸附着体。采用Instron试验机进行剪切粘结强度试验。计算每个样本组(包括牙釉质对照组)的平均、最大值、最小值和标准差SBS值。采用t检验评价组间差异的统计学意义。结果:除了在HFA和硅烷处理之前用绿石进行表面粗化外,SBS值没有显着差异。该方案产生略高的粘结强度,这在统计学上是显著的。结论:单独使用HFA/硅烷进行化学处理产生的SBS值在临床可接受的范围内,可以承受正畸治疗施加的力,并且有可能消除机械粗糙陶瓷表面的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Porcelain surface conditioning protocols and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Aim: The objective of the present study was to determine which of six bonding protocols yielded a clinically acceptable shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate porcelain restorations. A secondary aim was to determine which bonding protocol produced the least surface damage at debond.

Methods: Sixty lithium disilicate samples were fabricated to replicate the facial surface of a mandibular first molar using a CEREC CAD/CAM machine. The samples were split into six test groups, each of which received different mechanical/chemical pretreatment protocols to roughen the porcelain surface prior to bonding a molar orthodontic attachment. Shear bond strength testing was conducted using an Instron machine. The mean, maximum, minimal, and standard deviation SBS values for each sample group including an enamel control were calculated. A t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance between the groups.

Results: No significant differences were found in SBS values, with the exception of surface roughening with a green stone prior to HFA and silane treatment. This protocol yielded slightly higher bond strength which was statistically significant.

Conclusion: Chemical treatment alone with HFA/silane yielded SBS values within an acceptable clinical range to withstand forces applied by orthodontic treatment and potentially eliminates the need to mechanically roughen the ceramic surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信