医生躯干外观感知量表(TAPS-Phy) -一种评估特发性脊柱侧凸躯干畸形的有效可靠的工具。

Q1 Medicine
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Pub Date : 2016-08-17 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8
Antonia Matamalas, Elisabetta D'Agata, Judith Sanchez-Raya, Juan Bago
{"title":"医生躯干外观感知量表(TAPS-Phy) -一种评估特发性脊柱侧凸躯干畸形的有效可靠的工具。","authors":"Antonia Matamalas,&nbsp;Elisabetta D'Agata,&nbsp;Judith Sanchez-Raya,&nbsp;Juan Bago","doi":"10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of trunk deformity by physicians in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) has been considered an important part of clinical practice. Different methods to quantify the severity of trunk deformity by external observation have been reported. A valid tool to evaluate patients' perception of trunk deformity, the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS), is hereby validated for use by physicians (TAPS-Phy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of patients with non-surgically treated IS. Patients were prospectively recruited. On the day of the visit, a posterior-anterior radiograph in standard position and clinical photographs in three different views (anterior, posterior and forward bending position) were obtained. Patients also completed a TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Pat). Three different observers scored the TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Phy), based on the digital photographs previously obtained, twice a week. The angle of trunk inclination (ATRI) was also measured on digital photographs. Inter and intra-rater reliability was calculated through weighted kappa coefficient. External validity was tested by the Spearman correlation coefficient between the TAPS-Phy score and the scoliosis magnitude determined using the magnitude of the largest curve (MLC), ATRI, and TAPS-Pat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty two patients (46 women; mean age 16.6 years) were included. The average curve magnitude of the major curve was 44°. Mean scores of TAPS-Phy for the three evaluators ranged from 3.4 to 3.5. No differences between the three means were found. TAPS-Phy showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.84). Inter-observer reliability ranged from slight to substantial (0.14 to 0.63); intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.35 to 0.99. Correlation between TAPS-Phy and ATRI (r = -0.54 to -0.75), MLC (r = -0.47 to -0.6) and TAPS-Pat (r = 0.29 to 0.34) were statistically significant (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAPS-Phy is a valid and reliable scale to rate a physician's impression of the severity of the deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and can be useful in routine clinical records.</p>","PeriodicalId":21573,"journal":{"name":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trunk appearance perception scale for physicians (TAPS-Phy) - a valid and reliable tool to rate trunk deformity in idiopathic scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Matamalas,&nbsp;Elisabetta D'Agata,&nbsp;Judith Sanchez-Raya,&nbsp;Juan Bago\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of trunk deformity by physicians in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) has been considered an important part of clinical practice. Different methods to quantify the severity of trunk deformity by external observation have been reported. A valid tool to evaluate patients' perception of trunk deformity, the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS), is hereby validated for use by physicians (TAPS-Phy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of patients with non-surgically treated IS. Patients were prospectively recruited. On the day of the visit, a posterior-anterior radiograph in standard position and clinical photographs in three different views (anterior, posterior and forward bending position) were obtained. Patients also completed a TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Pat). Three different observers scored the TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Phy), based on the digital photographs previously obtained, twice a week. The angle of trunk inclination (ATRI) was also measured on digital photographs. Inter and intra-rater reliability was calculated through weighted kappa coefficient. External validity was tested by the Spearman correlation coefficient between the TAPS-Phy score and the scoliosis magnitude determined using the magnitude of the largest curve (MLC), ATRI, and TAPS-Pat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty two patients (46 women; mean age 16.6 years) were included. The average curve magnitude of the major curve was 44°. Mean scores of TAPS-Phy for the three evaluators ranged from 3.4 to 3.5. No differences between the three means were found. TAPS-Phy showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.84). Inter-observer reliability ranged from slight to substantial (0.14 to 0.63); intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.35 to 0.99. Correlation between TAPS-Phy and ATRI (r = -0.54 to -0.75), MLC (r = -0.47 to -0.6) and TAPS-Pat (r = 0.29 to 0.34) were statistically significant (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAPS-Phy is a valid and reliable scale to rate a physician's impression of the severity of the deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and can be useful in routine clinical records.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0085-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:医生对特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)患者躯干畸形的评估一直被认为是临床实践的重要组成部分。通过外部观察来量化躯干畸形严重程度的不同方法已被报道。作为一种评估患者躯干畸形感知的有效工具,躯干外观感知量表(TAPS)特此验证供医生使用(TAPS- phy)。方法:对非手术治疗的IS患者进行横断面研究。前瞻性地招募患者。在访问当天,获得标准位的前后位x线片和三种不同视图(前、后、前屈位)的临床照片。患者还完成了TAPS问卷调查(TAPS- pat)。三名不同的观察员根据先前获得的数码照片,每周两次给TAPS问卷(TAPS- phy)打分。在数码照片上也测量了躯干倾斜角(ATRI)。通过加权kappa系数计算信度。外部效度通过使用最大曲线(MLC)、ATRI和TAPS-Pat的大小确定TAPS-Phy评分与脊柱侧凸程度之间的Spearman相关系数进行检验。结果:52例患者(女性46例;平均年龄16.6岁)。主曲线的平均曲线幅度为44°。三名评估者的tap - phy平均得分在3.4 - 3.5之间。三种方法之间没有发现差异。TAPS-Phy具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha系数0.84)。观察者间信度范围从轻微到显著(0.14至0.63);观察者内信度范围从0.35到0.99。TAPS-Phy与ATRI (r = -0.54至-0.75)、MLC (r = -0.47至-0.6)和TAPS-Pat (r = 0.29至0.34)之间的相关性具有统计学意义(p)。结论:TAPS-Phy是评估医生对特发性脊柱侧凸患者畸形严重程度印象的有效可靠量表,可用于常规临床记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trunk appearance perception scale for physicians (TAPS-Phy) - a valid and reliable tool to rate trunk deformity in idiopathic scoliosis.

Trunk appearance perception scale for physicians (TAPS-Phy) - a valid and reliable tool to rate trunk deformity in idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: Evaluation of trunk deformity by physicians in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) has been considered an important part of clinical practice. Different methods to quantify the severity of trunk deformity by external observation have been reported. A valid tool to evaluate patients' perception of trunk deformity, the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS), is hereby validated for use by physicians (TAPS-Phy).

Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients with non-surgically treated IS. Patients were prospectively recruited. On the day of the visit, a posterior-anterior radiograph in standard position and clinical photographs in three different views (anterior, posterior and forward bending position) were obtained. Patients also completed a TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Pat). Three different observers scored the TAPS questionnaire (TAPS-Phy), based on the digital photographs previously obtained, twice a week. The angle of trunk inclination (ATRI) was also measured on digital photographs. Inter and intra-rater reliability was calculated through weighted kappa coefficient. External validity was tested by the Spearman correlation coefficient between the TAPS-Phy score and the scoliosis magnitude determined using the magnitude of the largest curve (MLC), ATRI, and TAPS-Pat.

Results: Fifty two patients (46 women; mean age 16.6 years) were included. The average curve magnitude of the major curve was 44°. Mean scores of TAPS-Phy for the three evaluators ranged from 3.4 to 3.5. No differences between the three means were found. TAPS-Phy showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.84). Inter-observer reliability ranged from slight to substantial (0.14 to 0.63); intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.35 to 0.99. Correlation between TAPS-Phy and ATRI (r = -0.54 to -0.75), MLC (r = -0.47 to -0.6) and TAPS-Pat (r = 0.29 to 0.34) were statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: TAPS-Phy is a valid and reliable scale to rate a physician's impression of the severity of the deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and can be useful in routine clinical records.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation.Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders is an open access, multidisciplinary journal that encompasses all aspects of research on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and cost-analyses of conservative and surgical management of all spinal deformities and disorders. Both clinical and basic science reports form the cornerstone of the journal in its endeavour to provide original, primary studies as well as narrative/systematic reviews and meta-analyses to the academic community and beyond. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders aims to provide an integrated and balanced view of cutting-edge spine research to further enhance effective collaboration among clinical spine specialists and scientists, and to ultimately improve patient outcomes based on an evidence-based spine care approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信