腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺活检对乳腺癌术前分期的预测价值。

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2016-04-06 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.5152/UCD.2015.2913
Muzaffer Akıncı, Serap Pamak Bulut, Fazilet Erözgen, Mihriban Gürbüzel, Gökçe Gülşen, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Mehmet Gülen, Rafet Kaplan
{"title":"腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺活检对乳腺癌术前分期的预测价值。","authors":"Muzaffer Akıncı,&nbsp;Serap Pamak Bulut,&nbsp;Fazilet Erözgen,&nbsp;Mihriban Gürbüzel,&nbsp;Gökçe Gülşen,&nbsp;Ahmet Kocakuşak,&nbsp;Mehmet Gülen,&nbsp;Rafet Kaplan","doi":"10.5152/UCD.2015.2913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diagnosis of axillary nodal involvement is significant in the management of breast cancer as well as in predicting prognosis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the efficiency of US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in preoperative axillary staging of early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and July 2013, 46 women were prospectively enrolled in the study. Ultrasound guided-FNABs for axillary assessment were performed preoperatively. Cytology results were compared with histopathology reports to determine its sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen cases that had malignant cytology on FNAB also had axillary involvement in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without any false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of US-guided FNAB were 63.3% and 100%, respectively. US-guided FNAB was accurate in predicting the status of the axilla in 76.1% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although this technique is favorable due to its minimally invasive nature, it is not as effective as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in terms of detecting axillary metastasis preoperatively. The low sensitivity and low accuracy rates decrease the usefulness of the technique. Therefore, it seems that US-guided FNAB alone could not replace SLNB. Nevertheless, combining some other molecular studies may be useful in increasing the technique's sensitivity. These issues should be determined by comprehensive clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"32 3","pages":"191-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/UCD.2015.2913","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in preoperative breast cancer staging.\",\"authors\":\"Muzaffer Akıncı,&nbsp;Serap Pamak Bulut,&nbsp;Fazilet Erözgen,&nbsp;Mihriban Gürbüzel,&nbsp;Gökçe Gülşen,&nbsp;Ahmet Kocakuşak,&nbsp;Mehmet Gülen,&nbsp;Rafet Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/UCD.2015.2913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diagnosis of axillary nodal involvement is significant in the management of breast cancer as well as in predicting prognosis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the efficiency of US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in preoperative axillary staging of early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and July 2013, 46 women were prospectively enrolled in the study. Ultrasound guided-FNABs for axillary assessment were performed preoperatively. Cytology results were compared with histopathology reports to determine its sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen cases that had malignant cytology on FNAB also had axillary involvement in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without any false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of US-guided FNAB were 63.3% and 100%, respectively. US-guided FNAB was accurate in predicting the status of the axilla in 76.1% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although this technique is favorable due to its minimally invasive nature, it is not as effective as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in terms of detecting axillary metastasis preoperatively. The low sensitivity and low accuracy rates decrease the usefulness of the technique. Therefore, it seems that US-guided FNAB alone could not replace SLNB. Nevertheless, combining some other molecular studies may be useful in increasing the technique's sensitivity. These issues should be determined by comprehensive clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"191-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/UCD.2015.2913\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.2913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.2913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:腋窝淋巴结受累的诊断对乳腺癌的治疗及预后预测具有重要意义。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了美国引导的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)在早期乳腺癌术前腋窝分期中的有效性。材料和方法:2011年1月至2013年7月期间,46名女性前瞻性纳入研究。术前行超声引导下的fnab用于腋窝评估。将细胞学结果与组织病理学报告进行比较,以确定其敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值及准确性。结果:19例FNAB细胞学检查为恶性的患者在腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)中也有腋窝受病灶,无假阳性结果。us引导下FNAB的敏感性为63.3%,特异性为100%。美国引导下的FNAB预测腋窝状态的准确率为76.1%。结论:虽然该技术具有微创性,但在术前检测腋窝转移方面不如前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)有效。低灵敏度和低准确率降低了该技术的实用性。因此,单靠美国主导的FNAB似乎无法取代SLNB。然而,结合其他一些分子研究可能有助于提高该技术的灵敏度。这些问题应该通过全面的临床试验来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictive value of fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in preoperative breast cancer staging.

Predictive value of fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in preoperative breast cancer staging.

Objective: Diagnosis of axillary nodal involvement is significant in the management of breast cancer as well as in predicting prognosis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the efficiency of US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in preoperative axillary staging of early breast cancer.

Material and methods: Between January 2011 and July 2013, 46 women were prospectively enrolled in the study. Ultrasound guided-FNABs for axillary assessment were performed preoperatively. Cytology results were compared with histopathology reports to determine its sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value and accuracy.

Results: Nineteen cases that had malignant cytology on FNAB also had axillary involvement in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without any false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of US-guided FNAB were 63.3% and 100%, respectively. US-guided FNAB was accurate in predicting the status of the axilla in 76.1% of patients.

Conclusion: Although this technique is favorable due to its minimally invasive nature, it is not as effective as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in terms of detecting axillary metastasis preoperatively. The low sensitivity and low accuracy rates decrease the usefulness of the technique. Therefore, it seems that US-guided FNAB alone could not replace SLNB. Nevertheless, combining some other molecular studies may be useful in increasing the technique's sensitivity. These issues should be determined by comprehensive clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信