腹腔镜胆囊部分切除术:困难胆囊切除术 "中安全有效的替代手术技术。

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2016-04-06 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.5152/UCD.2015.3086
Fatih Kulen, Deniz Tihan, Uğur Duman, Emrah Bayam, Gökhan Zaim
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊部分切除术:困难胆囊切除术 \"中安全有效的替代手术技术。","authors":"Fatih Kulen, Deniz Tihan, Uğur Duman, Emrah Bayam, Gökhan Zaim","doi":"10.5152/UCD.2015.3086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the \"gold standard\" for benign gallbladder diseases due to its advantages. In the presence of inflammation or fibrosis, the risk of bleeding and bile duct injury is increased during dissection. Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) is a feasible and safe method to prevent bile duct injuries and decrease the conversion (to open cholecystectomy) rates in difficult cholecystectomies where anatomical structures could not be demonstrated clearly.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The feasibility, efficiency, and safety of LPC were investigated. The data of 80 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent LPC (n=40) and conversion cholecystectomy (CC) (n=40) were retrospectively examined. Demographic characteristics, ASA scores, operating time, drain usage, requirement for intensive care, postoperative length of hospital stay, surgical site infection, antibiotic requirement and complication rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ASA value was 1 in the CC group and 2 in the LPC group. Mean operation time was 123 minutes in the CC group, and 87.50 minutes in the LPC group. Surgical drains were used in 16 CC patients and 4 LPC patients. There was no significant difference between groups in postoperative length of intensive care unit stay (p=0.241). When surgical site infections were compared, the difference was at the limit of statistical significance (p=0.055). Early complication rates were not different (p=0.608) but none of the patients in the LPC group suffered from late complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LPC is an efficient and safe way to decrease the conversion rate. LPC seems to be an alternative procedure to CC with advantages of shorter operating time, lower rates of surgical site infection, shorter postoperative hospitalization and fewer complications in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"32 3","pages":"185-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970776/pdf/ucd-32-3-185.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in \\\"difficult cholecystectomies\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Kulen, Deniz Tihan, Uğur Duman, Emrah Bayam, Gökhan Zaim\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/UCD.2015.3086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the \\\"gold standard\\\" for benign gallbladder diseases due to its advantages. In the presence of inflammation or fibrosis, the risk of bleeding and bile duct injury is increased during dissection. Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) is a feasible and safe method to prevent bile duct injuries and decrease the conversion (to open cholecystectomy) rates in difficult cholecystectomies where anatomical structures could not be demonstrated clearly.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The feasibility, efficiency, and safety of LPC were investigated. The data of 80 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent LPC (n=40) and conversion cholecystectomy (CC) (n=40) were retrospectively examined. Demographic characteristics, ASA scores, operating time, drain usage, requirement for intensive care, postoperative length of hospital stay, surgical site infection, antibiotic requirement and complication rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ASA value was 1 in the CC group and 2 in the LPC group. Mean operation time was 123 minutes in the CC group, and 87.50 minutes in the LPC group. Surgical drains were used in 16 CC patients and 4 LPC patients. There was no significant difference between groups in postoperative length of intensive care unit stay (p=0.241). When surgical site infections were compared, the difference was at the limit of statistical significance (p=0.055). Early complication rates were not different (p=0.608) but none of the patients in the LPC group suffered from late complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LPC is an efficient and safe way to decrease the conversion rate. LPC seems to be an alternative procedure to CC with advantages of shorter operating time, lower rates of surgical site infection, shorter postoperative hospitalization and fewer complications in high-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"185-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970776/pdf/ucd-32-3-185.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.3086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.3086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术因其优势而成为良性胆囊疾病的 "金标准"。如果胆囊存在炎症或纤维化,那么在解剖过程中出血和胆管损伤的风险就会增加。腹腔镜胆囊部分切除术(LPC)是一种可行且安全的方法,在解剖结构无法清晰显示的疑难胆囊切除术中可防止胆管损伤,降低转为开腹胆囊切除术的比例:研究了 LPC 的可行性、效率和安全性。回顾性研究了接受 LPC(40 例)和转换胆囊切除术(CC)(40 例)的 80 例胆石症患者的数据。比较了人口统计学特征、ASA评分、手术时间、引流管使用情况、重症监护需求、术后住院时间、手术部位感染、抗生素需求和并发症发生率:CC组的ASA中位值为1,LPC组为2。CC 组的平均手术时间为 123 分钟,LPC 组为 87.50 分钟。16 名 CC 患者和 4 名 LPC 患者使用了手术引流管。两组患者术后在重症监护室的住院时间没有明显差异(P=0.241)。在比较手术部位感染时,差异达到了统计学意义的极限(P=0.055)。早期并发症发生率没有差异(P=0.608),但 LPC 组患者无一出现晚期并发症:结论:LPC 是一种高效、安全的降低转归率的方法。结论:LPC是一种高效、安全的方法,可降低转归率。LPC似乎是CC的替代手术,具有手术时间短、手术部位感染率低、术后住院时间短、高危患者并发症少等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in "difficult cholecystectomies".

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the "gold standard" for benign gallbladder diseases due to its advantages. In the presence of inflammation or fibrosis, the risk of bleeding and bile duct injury is increased during dissection. Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) is a feasible and safe method to prevent bile duct injuries and decrease the conversion (to open cholecystectomy) rates in difficult cholecystectomies where anatomical structures could not be demonstrated clearly.

Material and methods: The feasibility, efficiency, and safety of LPC were investigated. The data of 80 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent LPC (n=40) and conversion cholecystectomy (CC) (n=40) were retrospectively examined. Demographic characteristics, ASA scores, operating time, drain usage, requirement for intensive care, postoperative length of hospital stay, surgical site infection, antibiotic requirement and complication rates were compared.

Results: The median ASA value was 1 in the CC group and 2 in the LPC group. Mean operation time was 123 minutes in the CC group, and 87.50 minutes in the LPC group. Surgical drains were used in 16 CC patients and 4 LPC patients. There was no significant difference between groups in postoperative length of intensive care unit stay (p=0.241). When surgical site infections were compared, the difference was at the limit of statistical significance (p=0.055). Early complication rates were not different (p=0.608) but none of the patients in the LPC group suffered from late complications.

Conclusion: LPC is an efficient and safe way to decrease the conversion rate. LPC seems to be an alternative procedure to CC with advantages of shorter operating time, lower rates of surgical site infection, shorter postoperative hospitalization and fewer complications in high-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信