{"title":"星偏移平衡试验:股骨髋臼撞击的判据及发散效度","authors":"Ann-Christin Johansson , Hillevi Karlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A valid functional test, evaluating dynamic balance control, might be valuable clinic tool for evaluation of treatment outcome on patients with femoral acetabular impingement (FAI).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate criterion and divergent validity of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) on patients with bilateral FAI- changes, with unilateral clinical symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this cross sectional correlational and comparative study fifteen patients with bilateral FAI with unilateral symptoms and 15 controls participated. Criterion validity was determined by analysing agreement between SEBT and The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), pain and leg strength on FAI patients. Divergent validity was determined by comparing SEBT on FAI patients with controls and by comparing SEBT on patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hips.</p></div><div><h3>Results/findings</h3><p>SEBT posterolateral and posteromedial direction had high criterion validity in relation to HAGOS subscale pain intensity and symptoms (r<sup>s</sup> = 0.75, p = 0.001, respectively r<sup>s</sup> = 0.70, p = 0.004). Criterion validity was low in relation to HAGOS subscales sports, recreation, participation in physical activity and quality of life. SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction had good divergent validity (p = 0.006, respectively p = 0.001) and in the posterolateral direction SEBT could differentiate between patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hip (p = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SEBT in posterolateral and posteromedial direction has good criterion validity in relation to pain and other symptoms. In the posterolateral and posteromedial direction SEBT also had divergent validity. Clinically it is recommended to combine SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction with other measurements on patients with FAI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49889,"journal":{"name":"Manual Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.015","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Star Excursion Balance Test: Criterion and divergent validity on patients with femoral acetabular impingement\",\"authors\":\"Ann-Christin Johansson , Hillevi Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A valid functional test, evaluating dynamic balance control, might be valuable clinic tool for evaluation of treatment outcome on patients with femoral acetabular impingement (FAI).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate criterion and divergent validity of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) on patients with bilateral FAI- changes, with unilateral clinical symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this cross sectional correlational and comparative study fifteen patients with bilateral FAI with unilateral symptoms and 15 controls participated. Criterion validity was determined by analysing agreement between SEBT and The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), pain and leg strength on FAI patients. Divergent validity was determined by comparing SEBT on FAI patients with controls and by comparing SEBT on patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hips.</p></div><div><h3>Results/findings</h3><p>SEBT posterolateral and posteromedial direction had high criterion validity in relation to HAGOS subscale pain intensity and symptoms (r<sup>s</sup> = 0.75, p = 0.001, respectively r<sup>s</sup> = 0.70, p = 0.004). Criterion validity was low in relation to HAGOS subscales sports, recreation, participation in physical activity and quality of life. SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction had good divergent validity (p = 0.006, respectively p = 0.001) and in the posterolateral direction SEBT could differentiate between patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hip (p = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SEBT in posterolateral and posteromedial direction has good criterion validity in relation to pain and other symptoms. In the posterolateral and posteromedial direction SEBT also had divergent validity. Clinically it is recommended to combine SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction with other measurements on patients with FAI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 104-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.015\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manual Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
背景一项有效的功能测试,评估动态平衡控制,可能是评估股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)患者治疗效果的有价值的临床工具。目的本研究的目的是评估星偏移平衡试验(SEBT)对双侧FAI-改变患者的标准和发散效度,伴有单侧临床症状。方法对15例伴有单侧症状的双侧FAI患者和15例对照患者进行横断面相关性比较研究。通过分析SEBT与哥本哈根髋关节和腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS)、髋关节运动量表(HSAS)、FAI患者疼痛和腿部力量之间的一致性来确定标准的效度。通过比较FAI患者与对照组的SEBT以及比较患者有症状和无症状髋关节的SEBT来确定分歧效度。结果/发现sebt后外侧和后内侧方向与HAGOS亚量表疼痛强度和症状有较高的标准效度(rs = 0.75, p = 0.001, rs = 0.70, p = 0.004)。HAGOS量表的运动、娱乐、参与体育活动和生活质量的效度较低。SEBT在后外侧和后内侧方向具有良好的发散效度(p = 0.006, p = 0.001),在后外侧方向可以区分患者有无症状的髋关节(p = 0.005)。结论后外侧和后内侧方向sebt对疼痛和其他症状有较好的标准效度。在后外侧和后内侧方向上,SEBT也有不同的效度。临床上建议FAI患者将后外侧和后内侧方向的SEBT与其他测量相结合。
The Star Excursion Balance Test: Criterion and divergent validity on patients with femoral acetabular impingement
Background
A valid functional test, evaluating dynamic balance control, might be valuable clinic tool for evaluation of treatment outcome on patients with femoral acetabular impingement (FAI).
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate criterion and divergent validity of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) on patients with bilateral FAI- changes, with unilateral clinical symptoms.
Method
In this cross sectional correlational and comparative study fifteen patients with bilateral FAI with unilateral symptoms and 15 controls participated. Criterion validity was determined by analysing agreement between SEBT and The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), pain and leg strength on FAI patients. Divergent validity was determined by comparing SEBT on FAI patients with controls and by comparing SEBT on patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hips.
Results/findings
SEBT posterolateral and posteromedial direction had high criterion validity in relation to HAGOS subscale pain intensity and symptoms (rs = 0.75, p = 0.001, respectively rs = 0.70, p = 0.004). Criterion validity was low in relation to HAGOS subscales sports, recreation, participation in physical activity and quality of life. SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction had good divergent validity (p = 0.006, respectively p = 0.001) and in the posterolateral direction SEBT could differentiate between patient's symptomatic and asymptomatic hip (p = 0.005).
Conclusions
SEBT in posterolateral and posteromedial direction has good criterion validity in relation to pain and other symptoms. In the posterolateral and posteromedial direction SEBT also had divergent validity. Clinically it is recommended to combine SEBT in the posterolateral and posteromedial direction with other measurements on patients with FAI.