一种独特的视神经鞘直径超声测量可靠性学习曲线估计方法。

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Critical Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-08-08 DOI:10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x
Frederick A Zeiler, Markus T Ziesmann, Patrick Goeres, Bertram Unger, Jason Park, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Michael Blaivas, Ashley Vergis, Lawrence M Gillman
{"title":"一种独特的视神经鞘直径超声测量可靠性学习曲线估计方法。","authors":"Frederick A Zeiler,&nbsp;Markus T Ziesmann,&nbsp;Patrick Goeres,&nbsp;Bertram Unger,&nbsp;Jason Park,&nbsp;Dimitrios Karakitsos,&nbsp;Michael Blaivas,&nbsp;Ashley Vergis,&nbsp;Lawrence M Gillman","doi":"10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46598,"journal":{"name":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Frederick A Zeiler,&nbsp;Markus T Ziesmann,&nbsp;Patrick Goeres,&nbsp;Bertram Unger,&nbsp;Jason Park,&nbsp;Dimitrios Karakitsos,&nbsp;Michael Blaivas,&nbsp;Ashley Vergis,&nbsp;Lawrence M Gillman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Ultrasound Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Ultrasound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

背景:视神经鞘直径(ONSD)测量超声已被提出作为一种快速,无创,点护理技术来估计颅内压(ICP)。视神经鞘的超声测量是相当具有挑战性的,并且关于该技术的学习曲线的文献有限。我们试图开发一种方法,利用独特的可靠性定义来估计ONSD测量的可靠性学习曲线:受试者内部变异性的平台,受试者之间的变异性不变。方法:作为先前发表的一项研究的一部分,一名操作员在6个月的时间里测量了120名健康志愿者的ONSD。假设在本研究中对每个受试者进行的四次测量应该是相等的,受试者内方差的关系使用二次平台模型进行描述,并通过分段多项式(结)回归进行评估。结果:分段多项式(knot)回归显示,在第21个受试者之后,受试者内方差呈平台期。然而,总体平均值[3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)]或受试者间方差[14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)]高于或低于该截止值均无差异。结论:这项研究表明,与ONSD测量相关的学习曲线是有限的。它还提供了一种独特的方法来计算与ONSD测量相关的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.

A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.

A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement.

Background: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability.

Methods: As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression.

Results: Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.

Conclusions: This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Ultrasound Journal
Critical Ultrasound Journal RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信