{"title":"用糖肽类核心抗原的IgA抗体进行禽分枝杆菌复合体的血清诊断。","authors":"Yoshitsugu Higashi, Shigeki Nakamura, Hiromi Tomono, Shotaro Ide, Takahiro Takazono, Taiga Miyazaki, Koichi Izumikawa, Katsunori Yanagihara, Yoshihiro Yamamoto, Shigeru Kohno","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) can be challenging. A serodiagnosis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, which detects the serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core IgA antibody, has been commercialized recently; however, its clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of MAC-PD is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the availability of this kit and identify factors affecting testing accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 195 patients who were evaluated with an EIA kit at Nagasaki University Hospital between November 2012 and March 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 of 16 (75.0%) MAC patients have underlying diseases ; 8 of 16 (50%) had complications associated with respiratory diseases. There were no significant differences between the seropositive and seronegative background of patients with confirmed MAC-PD. Regarding the accuracy of serodiagnosis EIA kit, its sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 88.3% (with a cut-off value of 0.7 U/ml), respectively. Of false-positive patients with bronchiectasis, 28.6 % demonstrated a good response to anti-MAC treatment, indicating that the sensitivity of the EIA kit might be higher than that of culture-based diagnosis because patients with clinically diagnosed MAC-PD were included in the false-positive population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the current study, the serodiagnosis EIA kit demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Further clinical investigations are necessary to clarify the role of this kit in definitively diagnosing MAC infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":17997,"journal":{"name":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","volume":"91 2","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[SERODIAGNOSIS OF THE MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM COMPLEX BY USING IgA ANTIBODIES FOR THE GLYCOPEPTIDOLIPID CORE ANTIGEN].\",\"authors\":\"Yoshitsugu Higashi, Shigeki Nakamura, Hiromi Tomono, Shotaro Ide, Takahiro Takazono, Taiga Miyazaki, Koichi Izumikawa, Katsunori Yanagihara, Yoshihiro Yamamoto, Shigeru Kohno\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) can be challenging. A serodiagnosis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, which detects the serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core IgA antibody, has been commercialized recently; however, its clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of MAC-PD is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the availability of this kit and identify factors affecting testing accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 195 patients who were evaluated with an EIA kit at Nagasaki University Hospital between November 2012 and March 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 of 16 (75.0%) MAC patients have underlying diseases ; 8 of 16 (50%) had complications associated with respiratory diseases. There were no significant differences between the seropositive and seronegative background of patients with confirmed MAC-PD. Regarding the accuracy of serodiagnosis EIA kit, its sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 88.3% (with a cut-off value of 0.7 U/ml), respectively. Of false-positive patients with bronchiectasis, 28.6 % demonstrated a good response to anti-MAC treatment, indicating that the sensitivity of the EIA kit might be higher than that of culture-based diagnosis because patients with clinically diagnosed MAC-PD were included in the false-positive population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the current study, the serodiagnosis EIA kit demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Further clinical investigations are necessary to clarify the role of this kit in definitively diagnosing MAC infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"volume\":\"91 2\",\"pages\":\"27-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[SERODIAGNOSIS OF THE MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM COMPLEX BY USING IgA ANTIBODIES FOR THE GLYCOPEPTIDOLIPID CORE ANTIGEN].
Purpose: The diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) can be challenging. A serodiagnosis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, which detects the serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core IgA antibody, has been commercialized recently; however, its clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of MAC-PD is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the availability of this kit and identify factors affecting testing accuracy.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 195 patients who were evaluated with an EIA kit at Nagasaki University Hospital between November 2012 and March 2014.
Results: 12 of 16 (75.0%) MAC patients have underlying diseases ; 8 of 16 (50%) had complications associated with respiratory diseases. There were no significant differences between the seropositive and seronegative background of patients with confirmed MAC-PD. Regarding the accuracy of serodiagnosis EIA kit, its sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 88.3% (with a cut-off value of 0.7 U/ml), respectively. Of false-positive patients with bronchiectasis, 28.6 % demonstrated a good response to anti-MAC treatment, indicating that the sensitivity of the EIA kit might be higher than that of culture-based diagnosis because patients with clinically diagnosed MAC-PD were included in the false-positive population.
Conclusions: In the current study, the serodiagnosis EIA kit demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Further clinical investigations are necessary to clarify the role of this kit in definitively diagnosing MAC infections.