咽部阻抗高分辨率测压法测定健康志愿者吞咽功能的可靠性。

International Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-04-14 DOI:10.1155/2016/2718482
Taher I Omari, Johanna Savilampi, Karmen Kokkinn, Mistyka Schar, Kristin Lamvik, Sebastian Doeltgen, Charles Cock
{"title":"咽部阻抗高分辨率测压法测定健康志愿者吞咽功能的可靠性。","authors":"Taher I Omari,&nbsp;Johanna Savilampi,&nbsp;Karmen Kokkinn,&nbsp;Mistyka Schar,&nbsp;Kristin Lamvik,&nbsp;Sebastian Doeltgen,&nbsp;Charles Cock","doi":"10.1155/2016/2718482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. We evaluated the intra- and interrater agreement and test-retest reliability of analyst derivation of swallow function variables based on repeated high resolution manometry with impedance measurements. Methods. Five subjects swallowed 10 × 10 mL saline on two occasions one week apart producing a database of 100 swallows. Swallows were repeat-analysed by six observers using software. Swallow variables were indicative of contractility, intrabolus pressure, and flow timing. Results. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater comparisons of all variable means showed substantial to excellent agreement (intrarater ICC 0.85-1.00; mean interrater ICC 0.77-1.00). Test-retest results were less reliable. ICC for test-retest comparisons ranged from slight to excellent depending on the class of variable. Contractility variables differed most in terms of test-retest reliability. Amongst contractility variables, UES basal pressure showed excellent test-retest agreement (mean ICC 0.94), measures of UES postrelaxation contractile pressure showed moderate to substantial test-retest agreement (mean Interrater ICC 0.47-0.67), and test-retest agreement of pharyngeal contractile pressure ranged from slight to substantial (mean Interrater ICC 0.15-0.61). Conclusions. Test-retest reliability of HRIM measures depends on the class of variable. Measures of bolus distension pressure and flow timing appear to be more test-retest reliable than measures of contractility. </p>","PeriodicalId":32361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"2016 ","pages":"2718482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2718482","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Taher I Omari,&nbsp;Johanna Savilampi,&nbsp;Karmen Kokkinn,&nbsp;Mistyka Schar,&nbsp;Kristin Lamvik,&nbsp;Sebastian Doeltgen,&nbsp;Charles Cock\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/2718482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose. We evaluated the intra- and interrater agreement and test-retest reliability of analyst derivation of swallow function variables based on repeated high resolution manometry with impedance measurements. Methods. Five subjects swallowed 10 × 10 mL saline on two occasions one week apart producing a database of 100 swallows. Swallows were repeat-analysed by six observers using software. Swallow variables were indicative of contractility, intrabolus pressure, and flow timing. Results. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater comparisons of all variable means showed substantial to excellent agreement (intrarater ICC 0.85-1.00; mean interrater ICC 0.77-1.00). Test-retest results were less reliable. ICC for test-retest comparisons ranged from slight to excellent depending on the class of variable. Contractility variables differed most in terms of test-retest reliability. Amongst contractility variables, UES basal pressure showed excellent test-retest agreement (mean ICC 0.94), measures of UES postrelaxation contractile pressure showed moderate to substantial test-retest agreement (mean Interrater ICC 0.47-0.67), and test-retest agreement of pharyngeal contractile pressure ranged from slight to substantial (mean Interrater ICC 0.15-0.61). Conclusions. Test-retest reliability of HRIM measures depends on the class of variable. Measures of bolus distension pressure and flow timing appear to be more test-retest reliable than measures of contractility. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"2016 \",\"pages\":\"2718482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2718482\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2718482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2718482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

目的。我们评估了基于重复高分辨率压力测量和阻抗测量的分析人员推导的燕子函数变量的内部和内部一致性和测试-重测试可靠性。方法。5名受试者每隔一周两次吞下10 × 10 mL生理盐水,形成100次吞下的数据库。六位观察者用软件对燕子进行了重复分析。吞咽变量指示收缩力、肠内压力和血流时机。结果。所有变量平均值的内部和内部比较的平均类内相关系数(ICC)显示出相当好的一致性(内部ICC 0.85-1.00;平均解释器ICC 0.77-1.00)。重测结果不太可靠。根据变量的类别,测试-再测试比较的ICC从轻微到优异不等。收缩性变量在重测信度方面差异最大。在收缩力变量中,UES基础压力表现出极好的复测一致性(平均ICC 0.94), UES松弛后收缩压力的测量显示中度至重度的复测一致性(平均Interrater ICC 0.47-0.67),咽收缩压力的复测一致性范围从轻微到重度(平均Interrater ICC 0.15-0.61)。结论。HRIM测度的重测信度取决于变量的类别。测量膨胀压力和流动时间似乎比测量收缩性更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.

The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.

The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.

The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers.

Purpose. We evaluated the intra- and interrater agreement and test-retest reliability of analyst derivation of swallow function variables based on repeated high resolution manometry with impedance measurements. Methods. Five subjects swallowed 10 × 10 mL saline on two occasions one week apart producing a database of 100 swallows. Swallows were repeat-analysed by six observers using software. Swallow variables were indicative of contractility, intrabolus pressure, and flow timing. Results. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater comparisons of all variable means showed substantial to excellent agreement (intrarater ICC 0.85-1.00; mean interrater ICC 0.77-1.00). Test-retest results were less reliable. ICC for test-retest comparisons ranged from slight to excellent depending on the class of variable. Contractility variables differed most in terms of test-retest reliability. Amongst contractility variables, UES basal pressure showed excellent test-retest agreement (mean ICC 0.94), measures of UES postrelaxation contractile pressure showed moderate to substantial test-retest agreement (mean Interrater ICC 0.47-0.67), and test-retest agreement of pharyngeal contractile pressure ranged from slight to substantial (mean Interrater ICC 0.15-0.61). Conclusions. Test-retest reliability of HRIM measures depends on the class of variable. Measures of bolus distension pressure and flow timing appear to be more test-retest reliable than measures of contractility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信