认知的谦虚、炫耀与表观遗传学的不确定性:论(社会)科学的知识机制。

Sociological review monograph Pub Date : 2016-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-04-21 DOI:10.1002/2059-7932.12020
Martyn Pickersgill
{"title":"认知的谦虚、炫耀与表观遗传学的不确定性:论(社会)科学的知识机制。","authors":"Martyn Pickersgill","doi":"10.1002/2059-7932.12020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epigenetic processes are garnering attention in the social sciences, where some scholars assert their importance for theorizing social life. I engage with such ideas here by drawing on interviews with leading bioscientists. To begin with, I underscore the (productive) uncertainties of those working in and around epigenetics; I describe these as a manifestation of 'epistemic modesty', and suggest that dissensus helps to propel biomedical innovation. Then, drawing on the concept of 'alien science', I detail some researchers' ambivalences regarding the notion of 'transgenerational inheritance'; their dissatisfaction with the (public) communication practices of other scientists (situated in what I term a regime of 'epistemic ostentatiousness'); and the challenges faced when moderating societal discussion of epigenetics in ways that expand excitement whilst deflating (what researchers regard as) unrealistic expectations. The paper concludes with reflections on the knowledge machinery of the (social) sciences, and employs the study data to interrogate sociological engagements with epigenetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":76551,"journal":{"name":"Sociological review monograph","volume":"64 1","pages":"186-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/2059-7932.12020","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: on the knowledge machinery of (social) science.\",\"authors\":\"Martyn Pickersgill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2059-7932.12020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epigenetic processes are garnering attention in the social sciences, where some scholars assert their importance for theorizing social life. I engage with such ideas here by drawing on interviews with leading bioscientists. To begin with, I underscore the (productive) uncertainties of those working in and around epigenetics; I describe these as a manifestation of 'epistemic modesty', and suggest that dissensus helps to propel biomedical innovation. Then, drawing on the concept of 'alien science', I detail some researchers' ambivalences regarding the notion of 'transgenerational inheritance'; their dissatisfaction with the (public) communication practices of other scientists (situated in what I term a regime of 'epistemic ostentatiousness'); and the challenges faced when moderating societal discussion of epigenetics in ways that expand excitement whilst deflating (what researchers regard as) unrealistic expectations. The paper concludes with reflections on the knowledge machinery of the (social) sciences, and employs the study data to interrogate sociological engagements with epigenetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological review monograph\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"186-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/2059-7932.12020\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological review monograph\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological review monograph","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

表观遗传过程在社会科学中引起了人们的关注,一些学者断言它们对社会生活的理论化很重要。在这里,我通过对顶尖生物科学家的采访来阐述这些观点。首先,我要强调那些在表观遗传学及其周围工作的人(富有成效的)不确定性;我将这些描述为“认知谦虚”的一种表现,并认为不同意见有助于推动生物医学创新。然后,利用“外星科学”的概念,我详细介绍了一些研究人员对“跨代遗传”概念的矛盾态度;他们对其他科学家的(公开)交流实践的不满(我称之为“知识炫耀”的制度);以及如何缓和社会对表观遗传学的讨论,在扩大兴奋的同时减少(研究人员认为的)不切实际的期望时所面临的挑战。论文总结了对(社会)科学知识机制的反思,并利用研究数据来询问与表观遗传学的社会学接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: on the knowledge machinery of (social) science.

Epigenetic processes are garnering attention in the social sciences, where some scholars assert their importance for theorizing social life. I engage with such ideas here by drawing on interviews with leading bioscientists. To begin with, I underscore the (productive) uncertainties of those working in and around epigenetics; I describe these as a manifestation of 'epistemic modesty', and suggest that dissensus helps to propel biomedical innovation. Then, drawing on the concept of 'alien science', I detail some researchers' ambivalences regarding the notion of 'transgenerational inheritance'; their dissatisfaction with the (public) communication practices of other scientists (situated in what I term a regime of 'epistemic ostentatiousness'); and the challenges faced when moderating societal discussion of epigenetics in ways that expand excitement whilst deflating (what researchers regard as) unrealistic expectations. The paper concludes with reflections on the knowledge machinery of the (social) sciences, and employs the study data to interrogate sociological engagements with epigenetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信