{"title":"复杂地质条件下地下储气库选址的改进方法与实践","authors":"Wenpeng Guo , Bo Zhang , Yongtu Liang , Rui Qiu , Xuemei Wei , Pengtao Niu , Haoran Zhang , Zhuochao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing attention has been paid to the site selection of Underground Gas Storage<span> (UGS) due to the growing demand for natural gas peak shaving. Existing studies have made a practical contribution to this field based on the multidimensional geological exploration<span> data and the multi-criteria decision-making method. However, previous studies mainly focused on screening or ranking technologies with different principles, which means only the attributes of UGS in the design period were considered while the performance in the operation period was ignored. The operation plan and economic performance are considerable concerns to the UGS investors especially when this type of storage facility was unbundling from other sectors in natural gas companies. To solve the UGS site selection problems more comprehensively and practically, the geological conditions and the injection & extraction plan in the operation period are considered Simultaneously. A case from the S-X area in China indicates that: 1. The improved multi-period optimization model of the natural gas (NG) supply chain can obtain the injection and production plan of UGS which are the basic parameters for the economic analysis. 2. The top potential UGS estimated by geological conditions may take inferior performance in the operation stage (less peak shaving amount, low economic profits, and high freight of NG supply chain), so the UGS investors should consider the potential profits when the finished UGS is put into operation. The proposed framework can be a new theoretical guideline for the site selection problems of UGSs and can help UGS investors judge their investment.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved method and practice for site selection of underground gas storage under complex geological conditions\",\"authors\":\"Wenpeng Guo , Bo Zhang , Yongtu Liang , Rui Qiu , Xuemei Wei , Pengtao Niu , Haoran Zhang , Zhuochao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increasing attention has been paid to the site selection of Underground Gas Storage<span> (UGS) due to the growing demand for natural gas peak shaving. Existing studies have made a practical contribution to this field based on the multidimensional geological exploration<span> data and the multi-criteria decision-making method. However, previous studies mainly focused on screening or ranking technologies with different principles, which means only the attributes of UGS in the design period were considered while the performance in the operation period was ignored. The operation plan and economic performance are considerable concerns to the UGS investors especially when this type of storage facility was unbundling from other sectors in natural gas companies. To solve the UGS site selection problems more comprehensively and practically, the geological conditions and the injection & extraction plan in the operation period are considered Simultaneously. A case from the S-X area in China indicates that: 1. The improved multi-period optimization model of the natural gas (NG) supply chain can obtain the injection and production plan of UGS which are the basic parameters for the economic analysis. 2. The top potential UGS estimated by geological conditions may take inferior performance in the operation stage (less peak shaving amount, low economic profits, and high freight of NG supply chain), so the UGS investors should consider the potential profits when the finished UGS is put into operation. The proposed framework can be a new theoretical guideline for the site selection problems of UGSs and can help UGS investors judge their investment.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved method and practice for site selection of underground gas storage under complex geological conditions
Increasing attention has been paid to the site selection of Underground Gas Storage (UGS) due to the growing demand for natural gas peak shaving. Existing studies have made a practical contribution to this field based on the multidimensional geological exploration data and the multi-criteria decision-making method. However, previous studies mainly focused on screening or ranking technologies with different principles, which means only the attributes of UGS in the design period were considered while the performance in the operation period was ignored. The operation plan and economic performance are considerable concerns to the UGS investors especially when this type of storage facility was unbundling from other sectors in natural gas companies. To solve the UGS site selection problems more comprehensively and practically, the geological conditions and the injection & extraction plan in the operation period are considered Simultaneously. A case from the S-X area in China indicates that: 1. The improved multi-period optimization model of the natural gas (NG) supply chain can obtain the injection and production plan of UGS which are the basic parameters for the economic analysis. 2. The top potential UGS estimated by geological conditions may take inferior performance in the operation stage (less peak shaving amount, low economic profits, and high freight of NG supply chain), so the UGS investors should consider the potential profits when the finished UGS is put into operation. The proposed framework can be a new theoretical guideline for the site selection problems of UGSs and can help UGS investors judge their investment.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.