油流中T1色散对流体极化影响的模拟

IF 2.624
Rutger R. Tromp, Leo Pel, David M.J. Smeulders
{"title":"油流中T1色散对流体极化影响的模拟","authors":"Rutger R. Tromp,&nbsp;Leo Pel,&nbsp;David M.J. Smeulders","doi":"10.1016/j.jmro.2023.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article we use numerical simulations to study the effect of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion on fluid polarization buildup in oil flow to characterize the sensitivity of both a conventional NMR concept (ROI located inside the polarization magnet) and a Earth's field NMR concept (ROI outside and downstream of the polarization magnet) to <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion of flowing samples. As a polarization field in both concepts we use a 90 cm long Halbach magnet. The <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior of the oils is based on a set of crude oils that span a viscosity range of 0.7 cP up to 2·10<sup>4</sup> cP and <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> relaxation measurements for Larmor frequencies between 10 kHz and 20 MHz. Numerical simulations based on solving the Bloch-Torrey equation for the longitudinal magnetization component show that fluid polarization levels in a ROI of a Earth's field NMR system concept are much more strongly affected by <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion than in the conventional NMR system concept. As a result, we may conclude that the Earth's field NMR system design is less robust for measuring flowing samples that show strong <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior. In comparison, the conventional NMR system design is relatively insensitive to the effect of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion, as <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion effects were found to form a relatively small correction to the magnetization buildup. The conventional NMR system design consequently is the preferred implementation of a NMR system that operates on fluids with strong <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior. We show that in the presence of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion <em>s</em> = <em>vT</em><sub>1</sub>(0)/<em>L<sub>m</sub>*</em> may be used as a governing parameter for fluid polarization buildup, where <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>(0) is the <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> relaxation time in the center of the polarization magnet, and we show how an modified analytical uniform field model can be used to describe fluid polarization for a uniform flow velocity distribution in the presence of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion with an accuracy within 1% for the samples and field distribution considered in this study at industrially relevant flow velocities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6240,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling of T1 dispersion effects on fluid polarization in oil flow\",\"authors\":\"Rutger R. Tromp,&nbsp;Leo Pel,&nbsp;David M.J. Smeulders\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmro.2023.100124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article we use numerical simulations to study the effect of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion on fluid polarization buildup in oil flow to characterize the sensitivity of both a conventional NMR concept (ROI located inside the polarization magnet) and a Earth's field NMR concept (ROI outside and downstream of the polarization magnet) to <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion of flowing samples. As a polarization field in both concepts we use a 90 cm long Halbach magnet. The <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior of the oils is based on a set of crude oils that span a viscosity range of 0.7 cP up to 2·10<sup>4</sup> cP and <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> relaxation measurements for Larmor frequencies between 10 kHz and 20 MHz. Numerical simulations based on solving the Bloch-Torrey equation for the longitudinal magnetization component show that fluid polarization levels in a ROI of a Earth's field NMR system concept are much more strongly affected by <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion than in the conventional NMR system concept. As a result, we may conclude that the Earth's field NMR system design is less robust for measuring flowing samples that show strong <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior. In comparison, the conventional NMR system design is relatively insensitive to the effect of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion, as <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion effects were found to form a relatively small correction to the magnetization buildup. The conventional NMR system design consequently is the preferred implementation of a NMR system that operates on fluids with strong <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion behavior. We show that in the presence of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion <em>s</em> = <em>vT</em><sub>1</sub>(0)/<em>L<sub>m</sub>*</em> may be used as a governing parameter for fluid polarization buildup, where <em>T</em><sub>1</sub>(0) is the <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> relaxation time in the center of the polarization magnet, and we show how an modified analytical uniform field model can be used to describe fluid polarization for a uniform flow velocity distribution in the presence of <em>T</em><sub>1</sub> dispersion with an accuracy within 1% for the samples and field distribution considered in this study at industrially relevant flow velocities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6240,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666441023000328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666441023000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们使用数值模拟研究了T1色散对油流中流体极化形成的影响,以表征传统核磁共振概念(位于极化磁体内部的ROI)和地场核磁共振概念(位于极化磁体外部和下游的ROI)对流动样品T1色散的敏感性。作为两个概念中的极化场,我们使用90厘米长的哈尔巴赫磁铁。油的T1色散行为基于一组原油,其粘度范围为0.7 cP至2.104 cP, T1弛豫测量范围为10 kHz至20 MHz。基于求解纵向磁化分量Bloch-Torrey方程的数值模拟表明,与传统的核磁共振系统概念相比,在地磁场核磁共振系统概念的ROI中,流体极化水平受T1色散的影响要大得多。因此,我们可以得出结论,地球磁场核磁共振系统设计对于测量显示强T1色散行为的流动样品不太稳健。相比之下,传统的核磁共振系统设计对T1色散的影响相对不敏感,因为T1色散效应对磁化积累形成了相对较小的校正。因此,传统的核磁共振系统设计是核磁共振系统在具有强T1分散行为的流体上工作的首选实现。结果表明,在存在T1色散的情况下,s = vT1(0)/Lm*可以作为流体极化形成的控制参数,其中T1(0)为极化磁体中心的T1弛豫时间;我们展示了如何使用改进的解析均匀场模型来描述在T1色散存在下均匀流速分布的流体极化,在工业相关流速下,本研究中考虑的样品和场分布的精度在1%以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modelling of T1 dispersion effects on fluid polarization in oil flow

Modelling of T1 dispersion effects on fluid polarization in oil flow

In this article we use numerical simulations to study the effect of T1 dispersion on fluid polarization buildup in oil flow to characterize the sensitivity of both a conventional NMR concept (ROI located inside the polarization magnet) and a Earth's field NMR concept (ROI outside and downstream of the polarization magnet) to T1 dispersion of flowing samples. As a polarization field in both concepts we use a 90 cm long Halbach magnet. The T1 dispersion behavior of the oils is based on a set of crude oils that span a viscosity range of 0.7 cP up to 2·104 cP and T1 relaxation measurements for Larmor frequencies between 10 kHz and 20 MHz. Numerical simulations based on solving the Bloch-Torrey equation for the longitudinal magnetization component show that fluid polarization levels in a ROI of a Earth's field NMR system concept are much more strongly affected by T1 dispersion than in the conventional NMR system concept. As a result, we may conclude that the Earth's field NMR system design is less robust for measuring flowing samples that show strong T1 dispersion behavior. In comparison, the conventional NMR system design is relatively insensitive to the effect of T1 dispersion, as T1 dispersion effects were found to form a relatively small correction to the magnetization buildup. The conventional NMR system design consequently is the preferred implementation of a NMR system that operates on fluids with strong T1 dispersion behavior. We show that in the presence of T1 dispersion s = vT1(0)/Lm* may be used as a governing parameter for fluid polarization buildup, where T1(0) is the T1 relaxation time in the center of the polarization magnet, and we show how an modified analytical uniform field model can be used to describe fluid polarization for a uniform flow velocity distribution in the presence of T1 dispersion with an accuracy within 1% for the samples and field distribution considered in this study at industrially relevant flow velocities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信