数字色内窥镜在临床实践中的应用:康涅狄格州胃肠病学家的调查。

Karl M Langberg, Neil D Parikh, Yanhong Deng, Maria Ciarlegio, Loren Laine, Harry R Aslanian
{"title":"数字色内窥镜在临床实践中的应用:康涅狄格州胃肠病学家的调查。","authors":"Karl M Langberg,&nbsp;Neil D Parikh,&nbsp;Yanhong Deng,&nbsp;Maria Ciarlegio,&nbsp;Loren Laine,&nbsp;Harry R Aslanian","doi":"10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To use a survey to characterize and identify potential barriers to the use of digital chromoendoscopy (DC) by practicing gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, internet-based survey was sent to gastroenterologists in Connecticut who were members of one of three national gastrointestinal organizations. The survey collected demographic information, frequency of DC use, types of procedures that the respondent performs, setting of practice (academic vs community), years out of training, amount of training in DC, desire to have DC training and perceived barriers to DC use. Responses were collected anonymously. The primary endpoint was the proportion of endoscopists utilizing DC. Associations between the various data collected were analyzed using χ(2) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-four gastroenterologists (48%) of 261 who received the online survey responded. Seventy-eight percent of surveyed gastroenterologists have used DC during the performance of upper endoscopy and 81% with lower endoscopy. DC was used in more than half of procedures by only 14% of gastroenterologists during upper endoscopy and 12% during lower endoscopy. Twenty-three percent (upper) and 21% (lower) used DC more than one quarter of the time. DC was used for 10% or less of endoscopies by 60% (upper) and 53% (lower) of respondents. Endoscopists reported lack of training as the leading deterrent to DC use with 36% reporting it as their primary deterrent. Eighty-nine percent of endoscopists never received formal training in DC. Lack of time (30% of respondents), lack of evidence (24%) and lack of reimbursement (10%) were additional deterrents. There were no differences in DC use relative to academic vs community practice setting or years out of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DC is used infrequently by most endoscopists, primarily due to a lack of training. Training opportunities should be expanded to meet the interest expressed by the majority of endoscopists.</p>","PeriodicalId":23755,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"7 2","pages":"268-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848250/pdf/WJGPT-7-268.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.\",\"authors\":\"Karl M Langberg,&nbsp;Neil D Parikh,&nbsp;Yanhong Deng,&nbsp;Maria Ciarlegio,&nbsp;Loren Laine,&nbsp;Harry R Aslanian\",\"doi\":\"10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To use a survey to characterize and identify potential barriers to the use of digital chromoendoscopy (DC) by practicing gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, internet-based survey was sent to gastroenterologists in Connecticut who were members of one of three national gastrointestinal organizations. The survey collected demographic information, frequency of DC use, types of procedures that the respondent performs, setting of practice (academic vs community), years out of training, amount of training in DC, desire to have DC training and perceived barriers to DC use. Responses were collected anonymously. The primary endpoint was the proportion of endoscopists utilizing DC. Associations between the various data collected were analyzed using χ(2) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-four gastroenterologists (48%) of 261 who received the online survey responded. Seventy-eight percent of surveyed gastroenterologists have used DC during the performance of upper endoscopy and 81% with lower endoscopy. DC was used in more than half of procedures by only 14% of gastroenterologists during upper endoscopy and 12% during lower endoscopy. Twenty-three percent (upper) and 21% (lower) used DC more than one quarter of the time. DC was used for 10% or less of endoscopies by 60% (upper) and 53% (lower) of respondents. Endoscopists reported lack of training as the leading deterrent to DC use with 36% reporting it as their primary deterrent. Eighty-nine percent of endoscopists never received formal training in DC. Lack of time (30% of respondents), lack of evidence (24%) and lack of reimbursement (10%) were additional deterrents. There were no differences in DC use relative to academic vs community practice setting or years out of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DC is used infrequently by most endoscopists, primarily due to a lack of training. Training opportunities should be expanded to meet the interest expressed by the majority of endoscopists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"268-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848250/pdf/WJGPT-7-268.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:通过一项调查来描述和确定执业胃肠病学家使用数字色素内镜(DC)的潜在障碍。方法:一份匿名的、基于互联网的调查被发送给康涅狄格州的胃肠病学家,他们是三个国家胃肠组织之一的成员。该调查收集了人口统计信息、使用数据中心的频率、受访者执行的程序类型、实践环境(学术与社区)、培训年限、数据中心培训的数量、接受数据中心培训的愿望以及使用数据中心的感知障碍。回答是匿名收集的。主要终点是内窥镜医师使用DC的比例。采用χ(2)检验分析各收集数据之间的相关性。结果:接受在线调查的261名胃肠病学家中有124名(48%)做出了回应。78%的受访胃肠病学家在上内镜检查时使用DC, 81%的下内镜检查时使用DC。在一半以上的手术中,只有14%的胃肠病学家在上内镜检查中使用DC, 12%的胃肠病学家在下内镜检查中使用DC。23%(上)和21%(下)的人使用直流超过四分之一的时间。60%(上)和53%(下)的受访者在10%或更少的内窥镜检查中使用DC。内窥镜医师报告缺乏培训是阻碍DC使用的主要因素,36%的人报告这是他们的主要障碍。89%的内窥镜医生从未在华盛顿接受过正式培训。缺乏时间(30%的受访者)、缺乏证据(24%)和缺乏报销(10%)是额外的阻碍因素。与学术与社区实践环境或培训年限相比,DC的使用没有差异。结论:大多数内窥镜医师很少使用DC,主要是由于缺乏培训。应扩大培训机会,以满足大多数内窥镜医师表达的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Aim: To use a survey to characterize and identify potential barriers to the use of digital chromoendoscopy (DC) by practicing gastroenterologists.

Methods: An anonymous, internet-based survey was sent to gastroenterologists in Connecticut who were members of one of three national gastrointestinal organizations. The survey collected demographic information, frequency of DC use, types of procedures that the respondent performs, setting of practice (academic vs community), years out of training, amount of training in DC, desire to have DC training and perceived barriers to DC use. Responses were collected anonymously. The primary endpoint was the proportion of endoscopists utilizing DC. Associations between the various data collected were analyzed using χ(2) test.

Results: One hundred and twenty-four gastroenterologists (48%) of 261 who received the online survey responded. Seventy-eight percent of surveyed gastroenterologists have used DC during the performance of upper endoscopy and 81% with lower endoscopy. DC was used in more than half of procedures by only 14% of gastroenterologists during upper endoscopy and 12% during lower endoscopy. Twenty-three percent (upper) and 21% (lower) used DC more than one quarter of the time. DC was used for 10% or less of endoscopies by 60% (upper) and 53% (lower) of respondents. Endoscopists reported lack of training as the leading deterrent to DC use with 36% reporting it as their primary deterrent. Eighty-nine percent of endoscopists never received formal training in DC. Lack of time (30% of respondents), lack of evidence (24%) and lack of reimbursement (10%) were additional deterrents. There were no differences in DC use relative to academic vs community practice setting or years out of training.

Conclusion: DC is used infrequently by most endoscopists, primarily due to a lack of training. Training opportunities should be expanded to meet the interest expressed by the majority of endoscopists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信