霉菌过敏患者哮喘的临床差异分析。

Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk, Andrzej Bożek, Jerzy Jarząb, Radosław Gawlik
{"title":"霉菌过敏患者哮喘的临床差异分析。","authors":"Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk,&nbsp;Andrzej Bożek,&nbsp;Jerzy Jarząb,&nbsp;Radosław Gawlik","doi":"10.5603/PiAP.2016.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bronchial asthma is an increasing problem worldwide. The course of bronchial asthma is dependent on the type of inducing allergens. The differences between the clinical features of asthma in patients with monovalent allergies to molds and with other allergies were explored.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Randomly selected 1910 patients (924 women and 986 men) between 18-86 years in age were analyzed according to type of allergy and asthma. The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed on the basis of GINA criteria, physical examination and spirometry. Allergy diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of medical history, a positive skin prick test and the measurement of serum-specific IgE to inhalant allergens, using an extended profile of mold allergens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with monovalent allergies to molds (4% of analyzed group) had significantly more frequent diagnoses of asthma than patients in the other group (53% vs. 27.1-32.4%, p < 0.05). Patients with allergies to Alternaria alternata had an odds ratio of 2.11 (95%CI: 1.86-2.32) for receiving a diagnosis of bronchial asthma. They had less control over their asthma, which was more severe compared to patients with other allergies. Patients with asthma and allergies to mold had significantly more frequent exacerbation of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalization. They used a significantly greater mean daily dose of inhaled steroids compared to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with monovalent IgE allergies to molds are at a higher risk for asthma than patients with other allergies. Their asthma is often more intense and less controlled compared to that of patients with other types of allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20258,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical differences of asthma in patients with molds allergy.\",\"authors\":\"Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk,&nbsp;Andrzej Bożek,&nbsp;Jerzy Jarząb,&nbsp;Radosław Gawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/PiAP.2016.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bronchial asthma is an increasing problem worldwide. The course of bronchial asthma is dependent on the type of inducing allergens. The differences between the clinical features of asthma in patients with monovalent allergies to molds and with other allergies were explored.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Randomly selected 1910 patients (924 women and 986 men) between 18-86 years in age were analyzed according to type of allergy and asthma. The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed on the basis of GINA criteria, physical examination and spirometry. Allergy diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of medical history, a positive skin prick test and the measurement of serum-specific IgE to inhalant allergens, using an extended profile of mold allergens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with monovalent allergies to molds (4% of analyzed group) had significantly more frequent diagnoses of asthma than patients in the other group (53% vs. 27.1-32.4%, p < 0.05). Patients with allergies to Alternaria alternata had an odds ratio of 2.11 (95%CI: 1.86-2.32) for receiving a diagnosis of bronchial asthma. They had less control over their asthma, which was more severe compared to patients with other allergies. Patients with asthma and allergies to mold had significantly more frequent exacerbation of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalization. They used a significantly greater mean daily dose of inhaled steroids compared to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with monovalent IgE allergies to molds are at a higher risk for asthma than patients with other allergies. Their asthma is often more intense and less controlled compared to that of patients with other types of allergies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

支气管哮喘是一个日益严重的世界性问题。支气管哮喘的病程取决于诱发过敏原的类型。探讨单价霉菌过敏与其他过敏患者哮喘临床特征的差异。材料与方法:随机选取年龄在18 ~ 86岁的患者1910例(女性924例,男性986例),根据过敏和哮喘类型进行分析。根据GINA标准、体格检查和肺活量测定确定哮喘诊断。根据病史、阳性皮肤点刺试验和对吸入性过敏原的血清特异性IgE测定,使用扩展的霉菌过敏原谱,确认过敏诊断。结果:对霉菌单价过敏的患者(占分析组的4%)诊断哮喘的频率明显高于其他组(53%比27.1-32.4%,p < 0.05)。对交替菌过敏的患者接受支气管哮喘诊断的优势比为2.11 (95%CI: 1.86-2.32)。他们对哮喘的控制较少,与其他过敏症患者相比,哮喘更为严重。哮喘和霉菌过敏的患者有明显更频繁的哮喘恶化,需要全身皮质类固醇和/或住院治疗。与其他患者相比,他们吸入类固醇的平均日剂量明显更高。结论:霉菌单价IgE过敏患者发生哮喘的风险高于其他过敏患者。与其他类型的过敏患者相比,他们的哮喘往往更严重,更不受控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The clinical differences of asthma in patients with molds allergy.

Introduction: Bronchial asthma is an increasing problem worldwide. The course of bronchial asthma is dependent on the type of inducing allergens. The differences between the clinical features of asthma in patients with monovalent allergies to molds and with other allergies were explored.

Material and methods: Randomly selected 1910 patients (924 women and 986 men) between 18-86 years in age were analyzed according to type of allergy and asthma. The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed on the basis of GINA criteria, physical examination and spirometry. Allergy diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of medical history, a positive skin prick test and the measurement of serum-specific IgE to inhalant allergens, using an extended profile of mold allergens.

Results: Patients with monovalent allergies to molds (4% of analyzed group) had significantly more frequent diagnoses of asthma than patients in the other group (53% vs. 27.1-32.4%, p < 0.05). Patients with allergies to Alternaria alternata had an odds ratio of 2.11 (95%CI: 1.86-2.32) for receiving a diagnosis of bronchial asthma. They had less control over their asthma, which was more severe compared to patients with other allergies. Patients with asthma and allergies to mold had significantly more frequent exacerbation of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalization. They used a significantly greater mean daily dose of inhaled steroids compared to other patients.

Conclusion: Patients with monovalent IgE allergies to molds are at a higher risk for asthma than patients with other allergies. Their asthma is often more intense and less controlled compared to that of patients with other types of allergies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信