胸椎姿势与肩痛、活动度和功能有关吗?系统回顾

Eva Barrett , Mary O'Keeffe , Kieran O'Sullivan , Jeremy Lewis , Karen McCreesh
{"title":"胸椎姿势与肩痛、活动度和功能有关吗?系统回顾","authors":"Eva Barrett ,&nbsp;Mary O'Keeffe ,&nbsp;Kieran O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Jeremy Lewis ,&nbsp;Karen McCreesh","doi":"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Excessive thoracic kyphosis is considered a predisposing factor for shoulder pain, though there is uncertainty about the nature of the relationship between shoulder pain and thoracic spine posture. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the relationship between thoracic kyphosis and shoulder pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two reviewers independently searched eight electronic databases and identified relevant studies by applying eligibility criteria. Sources of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers using a previously validated tool (Ijaz et al., 2013). Data were synthesised using a level of evidence approach (van Tulder et al., 2003).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten studies were included. Four studies were rated as low risk of bias, three at moderate risk of bias and three at high risk of bias. There is a moderate level of evidence of no significant difference in thoracic kyphosis between groups with and without shoulder pain. One study at high risk of bias demonstrated significantly greater thoracic kyphosis in people with shoulder pain (p &lt; 0.05). There is a strong level of evidence that maximum shoulder ROM is greater in erect postures compared to slouched postures (p &lt; 0.001), in people with and without shoulder pain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thoracic kyphosis may not be an important contributor to the development of shoulder pain. While there is evidence that reducing thoracic kyphosis facilitates greater shoulder ROM, this is based on single-session studies whose long-term clinical relevance is unclear. Higher quality research is warranted to fully explore the role of thoracic posture in shoulder pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49889,"journal":{"name":"Manual Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 38-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.008","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is thoracic spine posture associated with shoulder pain, range of motion and function? A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Eva Barrett ,&nbsp;Mary O'Keeffe ,&nbsp;Kieran O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Jeremy Lewis ,&nbsp;Karen McCreesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Excessive thoracic kyphosis is considered a predisposing factor for shoulder pain, though there is uncertainty about the nature of the relationship between shoulder pain and thoracic spine posture. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the relationship between thoracic kyphosis and shoulder pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two reviewers independently searched eight electronic databases and identified relevant studies by applying eligibility criteria. Sources of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers using a previously validated tool (Ijaz et al., 2013). Data were synthesised using a level of evidence approach (van Tulder et al., 2003).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten studies were included. Four studies were rated as low risk of bias, three at moderate risk of bias and three at high risk of bias. There is a moderate level of evidence of no significant difference in thoracic kyphosis between groups with and without shoulder pain. One study at high risk of bias demonstrated significantly greater thoracic kyphosis in people with shoulder pain (p &lt; 0.05). There is a strong level of evidence that maximum shoulder ROM is greater in erect postures compared to slouched postures (p &lt; 0.001), in people with and without shoulder pain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Thoracic kyphosis may not be an important contributor to the development of shoulder pain. While there is evidence that reducing thoracic kyphosis facilitates greater shoulder ROM, this is based on single-session studies whose long-term clinical relevance is unclear. Higher quality research is warranted to fully explore the role of thoracic posture in shoulder pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 38-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.008\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manual Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

过度的胸后凸被认为是引起肩痛的一个易感因素,尽管肩痛和胸椎姿势之间的关系的性质还不确定。本系统综述的目的是探讨胸后凸与肩关节疼痛、肩关节活动度和功能之间的关系。方法2名审稿人独立检索8个电子数据库,应用入选标准筛选相关研究。两名审稿人使用先前经过验证的工具独立评估偏倚来源(Ijaz et al., 2013)。采用证据水平法对数据进行综合(van Tulder等人,2003年)。结果纳入10项研究。4项研究被评为低偏倚风险,3项为中等偏倚风险,3项为高偏倚风险。有中等水平的证据表明,有无肩痛的两组在胸后凸方面没有显著差异。一项高风险偏倚研究显示,肩关节疼痛患者的胸后凸明显加重(p <0.05)。有强有力的证据表明,与懒散的姿势相比,直立姿势的最大肩部活动度更大(p <0.001),在有和没有肩痛的人群中。结论胸后凸可能不是引起肩痛的重要因素。虽然有证据表明减少胸后凸可促进更大的肩部活动度,但这是基于单次研究,其长期临床相关性尚不清楚。需要更高质量的研究来充分探讨胸位在肩关节疼痛中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is thoracic spine posture associated with shoulder pain, range of motion and function? A systematic review

Introduction

Excessive thoracic kyphosis is considered a predisposing factor for shoulder pain, though there is uncertainty about the nature of the relationship between shoulder pain and thoracic spine posture. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the relationship between thoracic kyphosis and shoulder pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and function.

Methods

Two reviewers independently searched eight electronic databases and identified relevant studies by applying eligibility criteria. Sources of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers using a previously validated tool (Ijaz et al., 2013). Data were synthesised using a level of evidence approach (van Tulder et al., 2003).

Results

Ten studies were included. Four studies were rated as low risk of bias, three at moderate risk of bias and three at high risk of bias. There is a moderate level of evidence of no significant difference in thoracic kyphosis between groups with and without shoulder pain. One study at high risk of bias demonstrated significantly greater thoracic kyphosis in people with shoulder pain (p < 0.05). There is a strong level of evidence that maximum shoulder ROM is greater in erect postures compared to slouched postures (p < 0.001), in people with and without shoulder pain.

Conclusions

Thoracic kyphosis may not be an important contributor to the development of shoulder pain. While there is evidence that reducing thoracic kyphosis facilitates greater shoulder ROM, this is based on single-session studies whose long-term clinical relevance is unclear. Higher quality research is warranted to fully explore the role of thoracic posture in shoulder pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manual Therapy
Manual Therapy 医学-康复医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信