接受儿童姑息治疗的儿童家长对决策的影响

Karen W Carroll, Cynthia J Mollen, Sarah Aldridge, Kari R Hexem, Chris Feudtner
{"title":"接受儿童姑息治疗的儿童家长对决策的影响","authors":"Karen W Carroll,&nbsp;Cynthia J Mollen,&nbsp;Sarah Aldridge,&nbsp;Kari R Hexem,&nbsp;Chris Feudtner","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.638019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parental decision making is a critical component in the provision of palliative and end-of-life care, yet factors that parents perceive as influencing this process, when they are making decisions for their children, have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a mixed-methods cohort study, we interviewed 73 parents of 50 pediatric patients who were referred to the hospital's pediatric palliative care service. The semistructured interviews focused on \"decision making for your child\"; the interviews were recorded and transcribed. A random sample (n = 13) was first coded and analyzed for core themes, and these themes were then cross-validated with a second random sample (n = 3) of interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four dominant interrelated themes permeated parents' discussions about the decisions they were making for their children and the process of decision making. First, Orientation and Direction (including the subthemes of Goals and Hopes, Spirituality and Meaning, and Purposeful Effort) connotes the parents' effort to establish and clarify the broad context of decision making. Second, Defining What Is Good for the Child (including the subthemes of Quality of Life and Suffering, and Normalcy and Normalization) conveys how the parents posed questions and pondered what decisions would be in the child's best interests. Third, the entwined theme of Relationships, Communication, and Support reflects how parents reported the social and interactive nature of decision making. Fourth, the theme of Feelings and Personal Accountability focuses inward as parents report efforts to deal with their emotional responses and self-judgments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents report grappling with several influences upon their decision-making processes that extend well beyond the standard discussions of medical information exchanges and the evaluation of risks and benefits. Decision support for these parents should account for these diverse influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507716.2011.638019","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences on Decision Making Identified by Parents of Children Receiving Pediatric Palliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Karen W Carroll,&nbsp;Cynthia J Mollen,&nbsp;Sarah Aldridge,&nbsp;Kari R Hexem,&nbsp;Chris Feudtner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2011.638019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parental decision making is a critical component in the provision of palliative and end-of-life care, yet factors that parents perceive as influencing this process, when they are making decisions for their children, have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a mixed-methods cohort study, we interviewed 73 parents of 50 pediatric patients who were referred to the hospital's pediatric palliative care service. The semistructured interviews focused on \\\"decision making for your child\\\"; the interviews were recorded and transcribed. A random sample (n = 13) was first coded and analyzed for core themes, and these themes were then cross-validated with a second random sample (n = 3) of interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four dominant interrelated themes permeated parents' discussions about the decisions they were making for their children and the process of decision making. First, Orientation and Direction (including the subthemes of Goals and Hopes, Spirituality and Meaning, and Purposeful Effort) connotes the parents' effort to establish and clarify the broad context of decision making. Second, Defining What Is Good for the Child (including the subthemes of Quality of Life and Suffering, and Normalcy and Normalization) conveys how the parents posed questions and pondered what decisions would be in the child's best interests. Third, the entwined theme of Relationships, Communication, and Support reflects how parents reported the social and interactive nature of decision making. Fourth, the theme of Feelings and Personal Accountability focuses inward as parents report efforts to deal with their emotional responses and self-judgments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents report grappling with several influences upon their decision-making processes that extend well beyond the standard discussions of medical information exchanges and the evaluation of risks and benefits. Decision support for these parents should account for these diverse influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507716.2011.638019\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.638019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.638019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

背景:父母的决策是提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的关键组成部分,然而,当父母为子女做决定时,他们认为影响这一过程的因素尚未得到很好的描述。方法:作为混合方法队列研究的一部分,我们采访了50名儿科患者的73名家长,他们被转介到医院的儿科姑息治疗服务。半结构化访谈的重点是“为你的孩子做决定”;这些采访都被录了下来。首先对一个随机样本(n = 13)进行编码和核心主题分析,然后与第二个随机样本(n = 3)的访谈进行交叉验证。结果:四个主要的相互关联的主题渗透了父母的讨论,他们为孩子做的决定和决策的过程。首先,取向和方向(包括目标和希望,精神和意义,有目的的努力的子主题)意味着父母努力建立和澄清决策的大背景。其次,定义什么是对孩子有益的(包括生活质量和痛苦,正常和正常化的副主题)传达了父母如何提出问题并思考什么样的决定最符合孩子的利益。第三,“关系、沟通和支持”这一交织在一起的主题反映了父母如何报告决策的社交性和互动性。第四,感受和个人责任的主题关注内在,因为父母报告了他们处理情绪反应和自我判断的努力。结论:父母报告说,他们的决策过程受到了一些影响,这些影响远远超出了医疗信息交流和风险与收益评估的标准讨论。对这些父母的决策支持应该考虑到这些不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influences on Decision Making Identified by Parents of Children Receiving Pediatric Palliative Care.

Background: Parental decision making is a critical component in the provision of palliative and end-of-life care, yet factors that parents perceive as influencing this process, when they are making decisions for their children, have not been well characterized.

Methods: As part of a mixed-methods cohort study, we interviewed 73 parents of 50 pediatric patients who were referred to the hospital's pediatric palliative care service. The semistructured interviews focused on "decision making for your child"; the interviews were recorded and transcribed. A random sample (n = 13) was first coded and analyzed for core themes, and these themes were then cross-validated with a second random sample (n = 3) of interviews.

Results: Four dominant interrelated themes permeated parents' discussions about the decisions they were making for their children and the process of decision making. First, Orientation and Direction (including the subthemes of Goals and Hopes, Spirituality and Meaning, and Purposeful Effort) connotes the parents' effort to establish and clarify the broad context of decision making. Second, Defining What Is Good for the Child (including the subthemes of Quality of Life and Suffering, and Normalcy and Normalization) conveys how the parents posed questions and pondered what decisions would be in the child's best interests. Third, the entwined theme of Relationships, Communication, and Support reflects how parents reported the social and interactive nature of decision making. Fourth, the theme of Feelings and Personal Accountability focuses inward as parents report efforts to deal with their emotional responses and self-judgments.

Conclusions: Parents report grappling with several influences upon their decision-making processes that extend well beyond the standard discussions of medical information exchanges and the evaluation of risks and benefits. Decision support for these parents should account for these diverse influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信