{"title":"长效降糖糖胰岛素对血糖控制不良的2型糖尿病血液透析患者的影响","authors":"Kentaro Wada, Yuko Wada, Shuichi Tsuruoka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ratio of elderly complicated diabetes mellitus (DM) to all hemodialysis (HD) patients has increased. The number of elderly DM patients with poor glycemic control has also increased due to complications, such as dementia. By means of appropriate glycemic control, the risk of cardiovascular disease might decrease among diabetic HD patients, and improvement of their prognosis could be expected. When glycemic control is poor when treating diabetic HD patients with oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin treatment could be indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using continuous glucose monitor (CGM), we evaluated the differences in glucose variability of 3 type 2 diabetic HD patients with poor glycemic control when switching from insulin glargine to degludec.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case 1 was a 72-year-old man with poor dietary self-management, whose glycated albumin (GA) level was 27%, and was administered lispro 6-6-6 U plus glargine 8 U daily. He was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U daily. Eight weeks later, his glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (19%) and CGM. Case 2 was an 84-year-old solitary woman with dementia. Her GA level was 28.4%, and she was administered glargine 8 U (after HD, 3 times/week). She was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U (after HD, 3 times/week). Her glycemic control improved as seen in her GA level (25.1%) and CGM thereafter. Case 3 was a 65-year-old solitary man with liver cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. His GA level was 26.6%, and he was administered glargine 8 U (every day). He was switched from glargine to degludec 12 U (after HD, 3 times/week). His glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (21.3%) and CGM thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that degludec is more effective than glargine in improving glycemic control and reducing the insulin dose in type 2 diabetic HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19721,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi","volume":"57 5","pages":"872-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effects of long-acting insulin degludec on type 2 diabetic hemodialysis patients with poor glycemic control].\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Wada, Yuko Wada, Shuichi Tsuruoka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ratio of elderly complicated diabetes mellitus (DM) to all hemodialysis (HD) patients has increased. The number of elderly DM patients with poor glycemic control has also increased due to complications, such as dementia. By means of appropriate glycemic control, the risk of cardiovascular disease might decrease among diabetic HD patients, and improvement of their prognosis could be expected. When glycemic control is poor when treating diabetic HD patients with oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin treatment could be indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using continuous glucose monitor (CGM), we evaluated the differences in glucose variability of 3 type 2 diabetic HD patients with poor glycemic control when switching from insulin glargine to degludec.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case 1 was a 72-year-old man with poor dietary self-management, whose glycated albumin (GA) level was 27%, and was administered lispro 6-6-6 U plus glargine 8 U daily. He was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U daily. Eight weeks later, his glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (19%) and CGM. Case 2 was an 84-year-old solitary woman with dementia. Her GA level was 28.4%, and she was administered glargine 8 U (after HD, 3 times/week). She was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U (after HD, 3 times/week). Her glycemic control improved as seen in her GA level (25.1%) and CGM thereafter. Case 3 was a 65-year-old solitary man with liver cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. His GA level was 26.6%, and he was administered glargine 8 U (every day). He was switched from glargine to degludec 12 U (after HD, 3 times/week). His glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (21.3%) and CGM thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that degludec is more effective than glargine in improving glycemic control and reducing the insulin dose in type 2 diabetic HD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"872-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Jinzo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:老年合并糖尿病(DM)在所有血液透析(HD)患者中的比例有所增加。由于痴呆等并发症,血糖控制不良的老年糖尿病患者数量也有所增加。通过适当的血糖控制,可降低糖尿病HD患者发生心血管疾病的风险,改善其预后。当口服降糖药治疗糖尿病HD患者血糖控制不佳时,可考虑胰岛素治疗。方法:采用连续血糖监测仪(CGM),评估3例血糖控制不良的2型糖尿病HD患者从甘精胰岛素切换到degludec时血糖变异性的差异。结果:病例1为72岁男性,饮食自我管理不良,糖化白蛋白(GA)水平为27%,每日给予利斯普罗6-6-6 U加甘精8u。他每天从甘精改为degludec 6u。8周后,血糖控制得到改善,GA水平(19%)和CGM均有所改善。病例2是一名84岁老年痴呆独居妇女。GA水平28.4%,给予甘精8 U (HD后,3次/周)。她从甘精改为degludec 6u (HD后,3次/周)。她的血糖控制得到改善,GA水平(25.1%)和此后的CGM。病例3为65岁独居男性,伴有肝硬化和慢性胰腺炎。GA水平26.6%,每日给予甘精8 U。从甘精改为degludec 12u (HD后,3次/周)。此后血糖控制改善,GA水平(21.3%)和CGM均有所改善。结论:在改善2型糖尿病HD患者的血糖控制和降低胰岛素剂量方面,degludec比甘精更有效。
[Effects of long-acting insulin degludec on type 2 diabetic hemodialysis patients with poor glycemic control].
Background: The ratio of elderly complicated diabetes mellitus (DM) to all hemodialysis (HD) patients has increased. The number of elderly DM patients with poor glycemic control has also increased due to complications, such as dementia. By means of appropriate glycemic control, the risk of cardiovascular disease might decrease among diabetic HD patients, and improvement of their prognosis could be expected. When glycemic control is poor when treating diabetic HD patients with oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin treatment could be indicated.
Methods: Using continuous glucose monitor (CGM), we evaluated the differences in glucose variability of 3 type 2 diabetic HD patients with poor glycemic control when switching from insulin glargine to degludec.
Results: Case 1 was a 72-year-old man with poor dietary self-management, whose glycated albumin (GA) level was 27%, and was administered lispro 6-6-6 U plus glargine 8 U daily. He was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U daily. Eight weeks later, his glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (19%) and CGM. Case 2 was an 84-year-old solitary woman with dementia. Her GA level was 28.4%, and she was administered glargine 8 U (after HD, 3 times/week). She was switched from glargine to degludec 6 U (after HD, 3 times/week). Her glycemic control improved as seen in her GA level (25.1%) and CGM thereafter. Case 3 was a 65-year-old solitary man with liver cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. His GA level was 26.6%, and he was administered glargine 8 U (every day). He was switched from glargine to degludec 12 U (after HD, 3 times/week). His glycemic control improved as seen in his GA level (21.3%) and CGM thereafter.
Conclusions: These results suggest that degludec is more effective than glargine in improving glycemic control and reducing the insulin dose in type 2 diabetic HD patients.