超声成像技术中探头放置对b超质量保证测量影响的比较研究

Q3 Medicine
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2015-07-31 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874120701509010164
A Scorza, S Conforto, C D'Anna, S A Sciuto
{"title":"超声成像技术中探头放置对b超质量保证测量影响的比较研究","authors":"A Scorza,&nbsp;S Conforto,&nbsp;C D'Anna,&nbsp;S A Sciuto","doi":"10.2174/1874120701509010164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator's visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; </p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"9 ","pages":"164-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/59/TOBEJ-9-164.PMC4541336.pdf","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.\",\"authors\":\"A Scorza,&nbsp;S Conforto,&nbsp;C D'Anna,&nbsp;S A Sciuto\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701509010164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator's visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"164-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/59/TOBEJ-9-164.PMC4541336.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

为了检查或防止超声医疗系统的故障,应该安排一些临床适用性和技术功能评估的测试:其中,技术人员通过超声幻象进行的图像质量保证测试在今天很普遍,其结果取决于与扫描仪设置以及幻象特征和操作员经验相关的问题。在本研究中,在常规图像质量测试中测量了技术人员处理超声探头时b模式图像某些特征的变化:对来自两个阵列换能器的超声虚像进行处理,以评估操作员处理探头时距离精度、高对比度空间分辨率和穿透深度的测量色散。所有测量都是通过内部图像分析软件完成的,该软件最大限度地减少了由于操作员的视力和主观判断造成的误差,同时超声波换能器位置对质量保证测试结果的影响被估计为上述参数的扩展不确定度(测量再现性在95%置信水平):根据探头型号的不同,它们的高对比度空间分辨率范围为±0.1至±1.9 mm,距离测量误差范围为±0.1至±5.5%,信号可视化最大深度范围为±1至±10 mm。虽然数值结果仅限于两个检查探头,但它们证实了基于诊断超声系统一般工作原理的一些预测:(a)测量结果强烈依赖于设置以及所调查的幽灵特征,探头和参数;(b)由于探测器操纵对空间分辨率造成的相对不确定性可能非常高,即从10%到30%以上;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.

To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator's visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent;

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信