罕见病诊断:网络搜索、社交媒体和大规模数据挖掘方法综述。

Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.) Pub Date : 2015-09-16 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145
Dan Svenstrup, Henrik L Jørgensen, Ole Winther
{"title":"罕见病诊断:网络搜索、社交媒体和大规模数据挖掘方法综述。","authors":"Dan Svenstrup,&nbsp;Henrik L Jørgensen,&nbsp;Ole Winther","doi":"10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians and the general public are increasingly using web-based tools to find answers to medical questions. The field of rare diseases is especially challenging and important as shown by the long delay and many mistakes associated with diagnoses. In this paper we review recent initiatives on the use of web search, social media and data mining in data repositories for medical diagnosis. We compare the retrieval accuracy on 56 rare disease cases with known diagnosis for the web search tools google.com, pubmed.gov, omim.org and our own search tool findzebra.com. We give a detailed description of IBM's Watson system and make a rough comparison between findzebra.com and Watson on subsets of the Doctor's dilemma dataset. The recall@10 and recall@20 (fraction of cases where the correct result appears in top 10 and top 20) for the 56 cases are found to be be 29%, 16%, 27% and 59% and 32%, 18%, 34% and 64%, respectively. Thus, FindZebra has a significantly (p < 0.01) higher recall than the other 3 search engines. When tested under the same conditions, Watson and FindZebra showed similar recall@10 accuracy. However, the tests were performed on different subsets of Doctors dilemma questions. Advances in technology and access to high quality data have opened new possibilities for aiding the diagnostic process. Specialized search engines, data mining tools and social media are some of the areas that hold promise. </p>","PeriodicalId":74639,"journal":{"name":"Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Svenstrup,&nbsp;Henrik L Jørgensen,&nbsp;Ole Winther\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physicians and the general public are increasingly using web-based tools to find answers to medical questions. The field of rare diseases is especially challenging and important as shown by the long delay and many mistakes associated with diagnoses. In this paper we review recent initiatives on the use of web search, social media and data mining in data repositories for medical diagnosis. We compare the retrieval accuracy on 56 rare disease cases with known diagnosis for the web search tools google.com, pubmed.gov, omim.org and our own search tool findzebra.com. We give a detailed description of IBM's Watson system and make a rough comparison between findzebra.com and Watson on subsets of the Doctor's dilemma dataset. The recall@10 and recall@20 (fraction of cases where the correct result appears in top 10 and top 20) for the 56 cases are found to be be 29%, 16%, 27% and 59% and 32%, 18%, 34% and 64%, respectively. Thus, FindZebra has a significantly (p < 0.01) higher recall than the other 3 search engines. When tested under the same conditions, Watson and FindZebra showed similar recall@10 accuracy. However, the tests were performed on different subsets of Doctors dilemma questions. Advances in technology and access to high quality data have opened new possibilities for aiding the diagnostic process. Specialized search engines, data mining tools and social media are some of the areas that hold promise. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21675511.2015.1083145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

医生和公众越来越多地使用基于网络的工具来寻找医疗问题的答案。罕见病领域尤其具有挑战性和重要性,因为与诊断相关的长时间延误和许多错误表明。在本文中,我们回顾了最近在医学诊断数据存储库中使用网络搜索、社交媒体和数据挖掘的举措。我们比较了网络搜索工具google.com、pubmed.gov、omim.org和我们自己的搜索工具findzebra.com对56例已知诊断的罕见病的检索准确率。我们对IBM的沃森系统进行了详细的描述,并对findzebra.com和沃森在医生困境数据集的子集上进行了粗略的比较。在56个案例中,recall@10和recall@20(正确结果出现在前10名和前20名的案例比例)分别为29%,16%,27%和59%,32%,18%,34%和64%。因此,FindZebra的召回率显著(p < 0.01)高于其他3个搜索引擎。在相同的条件下进行测试时,沃森和FindZebra显示出相似的recall@10准确性。然而,测试是在医生困境问题的不同子集上进行的。技术的进步和高质量数据的获取为帮助诊断过程开辟了新的可能性。专业搜索引擎、数据挖掘工具和社交媒体是一些有希望的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.

Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.

Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.

Physicians and the general public are increasingly using web-based tools to find answers to medical questions. The field of rare diseases is especially challenging and important as shown by the long delay and many mistakes associated with diagnoses. In this paper we review recent initiatives on the use of web search, social media and data mining in data repositories for medical diagnosis. We compare the retrieval accuracy on 56 rare disease cases with known diagnosis for the web search tools google.com, pubmed.gov, omim.org and our own search tool findzebra.com. We give a detailed description of IBM's Watson system and make a rough comparison between findzebra.com and Watson on subsets of the Doctor's dilemma dataset. The recall@10 and recall@20 (fraction of cases where the correct result appears in top 10 and top 20) for the 56 cases are found to be be 29%, 16%, 27% and 59% and 32%, 18%, 34% and 64%, respectively. Thus, FindZebra has a significantly (p < 0.01) higher recall than the other 3 search engines. When tested under the same conditions, Watson and FindZebra showed similar recall@10 accuracy. However, the tests were performed on different subsets of Doctors dilemma questions. Advances in technology and access to high quality data have opened new possibilities for aiding the diagnostic process. Specialized search engines, data mining tools and social media are some of the areas that hold promise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信