大学医院和附属教学医院的督导临床医生如何评价CanMEDS角色框架中与临床见习教学相关的关键能力?

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-08-17 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000975
Stefanie Jilg, Andreas Möltner, Pascal Berberat, Martin R Fischer, Jan Breckwoldt
{"title":"大学医院和附属教学医院的督导临床医生如何评价CanMEDS角色框架中与临床见习教学相关的关键能力?","authors":"Stefanie Jilg,&nbsp;Andreas Möltner,&nbsp;Pascal Berberat,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Jan Breckwoldt","doi":"10.3205/zma000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>In German-speaking countries, the physicians' roles framework of the \"Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists\" (CanMEDS) is increasingly used to conceptualize postgraduate medical education. It is however unclear, whether it may also be applied to the final year of undergraduate education within clinical clerkships, called \"Practical Year\" (PY). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how clinically active physicians at a university hospital and at associated teaching hospitals judge the relevance of the seven CanMEDS roles (and their (role-defining) key competencies) in respect to their clinical work and as learning content for PY training. Furthermore, these physicians were asked whether the key competencies were actually taught during PY training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>124 physicians from internal medicine and surgery rated the relevance of the 28 key competencies of the CanMEDS framework using a questionnaire. For each competency, following three aspects were rated: \"relevance for your personal daily work\", \"importance for teaching during PY\", and \"implementation into actual PY teaching\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In respect to the main study objective, all questionnaires could be included into analysis. All seven CanMEDS roles were rated as relevant for personal daily work, and also as important for teaching during PY. Furthermore, all roles were stated to be taught during actual PY training. The roles \"Communicator\", \"Medical Expert\", and \"Collaborator\" were rated as significantly more important than the other roles, for all three sub-questions. No differences were found between the two disciplines internal medicine and surgery, nor between the university hospital and associated teaching hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participating physicians rated all key competencies of the CanMEDS model to be relevant for their personal daily work, and for teaching during PY. These findings support the suitability of the CanMEDS framework as a conceptual element of PY training.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"32 3","pages":"Doc33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580442/pdf/","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Jilg,&nbsp;Andreas Möltner,&nbsp;Pascal Berberat,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Jan Breckwoldt\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma000975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>In German-speaking countries, the physicians' roles framework of the \\\"Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists\\\" (CanMEDS) is increasingly used to conceptualize postgraduate medical education. It is however unclear, whether it may also be applied to the final year of undergraduate education within clinical clerkships, called \\\"Practical Year\\\" (PY). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how clinically active physicians at a university hospital and at associated teaching hospitals judge the relevance of the seven CanMEDS roles (and their (role-defining) key competencies) in respect to their clinical work and as learning content for PY training. Furthermore, these physicians were asked whether the key competencies were actually taught during PY training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>124 physicians from internal medicine and surgery rated the relevance of the 28 key competencies of the CanMEDS framework using a questionnaire. For each competency, following three aspects were rated: \\\"relevance for your personal daily work\\\", \\\"importance for teaching during PY\\\", and \\\"implementation into actual PY teaching\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In respect to the main study objective, all questionnaires could be included into analysis. All seven CanMEDS roles were rated as relevant for personal daily work, and also as important for teaching during PY. Furthermore, all roles were stated to be taught during actual PY training. The roles \\\"Communicator\\\", \\\"Medical Expert\\\", and \\\"Collaborator\\\" were rated as significantly more important than the other roles, for all three sub-questions. No differences were found between the two disciplines internal medicine and surgery, nor between the university hospital and associated teaching hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participating physicians rated all key competencies of the CanMEDS model to be relevant for their personal daily work, and for teaching during PY. These findings support the suitability of the CanMEDS framework as a conceptual element of PY training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Doc33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

背景和目的:在德语国家,“加拿大专家医学教育指令”(CanMEDS)的医生角色框架越来越多地用于概念化研究生医学教育。然而,目前尚不清楚,它是否也适用于临床见习的本科教育的最后一年,称为“实践年”(PY)。因此,本研究的目的是探讨大学医院和附属教学医院的临床活跃医生如何判断七种CanMEDS角色(及其(角色定义)关键能力)在临床工作和PY培训学习内容方面的相关性。此外,这些医生被问及在PY培训中是否真正教授了关键能力。方法:124名内科和外科医生使用问卷对CanMEDS框架的28项关键能力的相关性进行评分。对于每一项胜任力,分别从“与个人日常工作的相关性”、“对PY教学的重要性”、“在实际PY教学中的实施情况”三个方面进行打分。结果:就主要研究目的而言,所有问卷均可纳入分析。所有七个CanMEDS角色都被评为与个人日常工作相关,并且对PY期间的教学也同样重要。此外,所有的角色都是在实际的PY培训中讲授的。在所有三个子问题中,“沟通者”、“医学专家”和“合作者”这三个角色被评为比其他角色重要得多。内外科两个学科之间没有差异,大学附属医院和附属教学医院之间也没有差异。结论:参与的医生认为CanMEDS模型的所有关键能力与他们的个人日常工作和PY期间的教学相关。这些发现支持CanMEDS框架作为PY培训概念要素的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?

How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?

How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?

How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?

Background and aim: In German-speaking countries, the physicians' roles framework of the "Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists" (CanMEDS) is increasingly used to conceptualize postgraduate medical education. It is however unclear, whether it may also be applied to the final year of undergraduate education within clinical clerkships, called "Practical Year" (PY). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how clinically active physicians at a university hospital and at associated teaching hospitals judge the relevance of the seven CanMEDS roles (and their (role-defining) key competencies) in respect to their clinical work and as learning content for PY training. Furthermore, these physicians were asked whether the key competencies were actually taught during PY training.

Methods: 124 physicians from internal medicine and surgery rated the relevance of the 28 key competencies of the CanMEDS framework using a questionnaire. For each competency, following three aspects were rated: "relevance for your personal daily work", "importance for teaching during PY", and "implementation into actual PY teaching".

Results: In respect to the main study objective, all questionnaires could be included into analysis. All seven CanMEDS roles were rated as relevant for personal daily work, and also as important for teaching during PY. Furthermore, all roles were stated to be taught during actual PY training. The roles "Communicator", "Medical Expert", and "Collaborator" were rated as significantly more important than the other roles, for all three sub-questions. No differences were found between the two disciplines internal medicine and surgery, nor between the university hospital and associated teaching hospitals.

Conclusion: Participating physicians rated all key competencies of the CanMEDS model to be relevant for their personal daily work, and for teaching during PY. These findings support the suitability of the CanMEDS framework as a conceptual element of PY training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信