遗传瓶颈和近亲繁殖对标准贵宾皮脂腺炎和艾迪生病两种主要自身免疫性疾病发病率的影响

Canine genetics and epidemiology Pub Date : 2015-08-27 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5
Niels C Pedersen, Lynn Brucker, Natalie Green Tessier, Hongwei Liu, Maria Cecilia T Penedo, Shayne Hughes, Anita Oberbauer, Ben Sacks
{"title":"遗传瓶颈和近亲繁殖对标准贵宾皮脂腺炎和艾迪生病两种主要自身免疫性疾病发病率的影响","authors":"Niels C Pedersen,&nbsp;Lynn Brucker,&nbsp;Natalie Green Tessier,&nbsp;Hongwei Liu,&nbsp;Maria Cecilia T Penedo,&nbsp;Shayne Hughes,&nbsp;Anita Oberbauer,&nbsp;Ben Sacks","doi":"10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sebaceous adenitis (SA) and Addison's disease (AD) increased rapidly in incidence among Standard Poodles after the mid-twentieth century. Previous attempts to identify specific genetic causes using genome wide association studies and interrogation of the dog leukocyte antigen (DLA) region have been non-productive. However, such studies led us to hypothesize that positive selection for desired phenotypic traits that arose in the mid-twentieth century led to intense inbreeding and the inadvertent amplification of AD and SA associated traits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This hypothesis was tested with genetic studies of 761 Standard, Miniature, and Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses from the USA, Canada and Europe, coupled with extensive pedigree analysis of thousands more dogs. Genome-wide diversity across the world-wide population was measured using a panel of 33 short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Allele frequency data were also used to determine the internal relatedness of individual dogs within the population as a whole. Assays based on linkage between STR genomic loci and DLA genes were used to identify class I and II haplotypes and disease associations. Genetic diversity statistics based on genomic STR markers indicated that Standard Poodles from North America and Europe were closely related and reasonably diverse across the breed. However, genetic diversity statistics, internal relatedness, principal coordinate analysis, and DLA haplotype frequencies showed a marked imbalance with 30 % of the diversity in 70 % of the dogs. Standard Poodles with SA and AD were strongly linked to this inbred population, with dogs suffering with SA being the most inbred. No single strong association was found between STR defined DLA class I or II haplotypes and SA or AD in the breed as a whole, although certain haplotypes present in a minority of the population appeared to confer moderate degrees of risk or protection against either or both diseases. Dogs possessing minor DLA class I haplotypes were half as likely to develop SA or AD as dogs with common haplotypes. Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses being used for outcrossing were more genetically diverse than Standard Poodles and genetically distinguishable across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ancestral genetic polymorphisms responsible for SA and AD entered Standard Poodles through separate lineages, AD earlier and SA later, and were increasingly fixed by a period of close linebreeding that was related to popular bloodlines from the mid-twentieth century. This event has become known as the midcentury bottleneck or MCB. Sustained positive selection resulted in a marked imbalance in genetic diversity across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region. Both SA and AD were concentrated among the most inbred dogs, with genetic outliers being relatively disease free. No specific genetic markers other than those reflecting the degree of inbreeding were consistently associated with either disease. Standard Poodles as a whole remain genetically diverse, but steps should be taken to rebalance diversity using genetic outliers and if necessary, outcrosses to phenotypically similar but genetically distinct breeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":91060,"journal":{"name":"Canine genetics and epidemiology","volume":"2 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles, sebaceous adenitis and Addison's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Niels C Pedersen,&nbsp;Lynn Brucker,&nbsp;Natalie Green Tessier,&nbsp;Hongwei Liu,&nbsp;Maria Cecilia T Penedo,&nbsp;Shayne Hughes,&nbsp;Anita Oberbauer,&nbsp;Ben Sacks\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sebaceous adenitis (SA) and Addison's disease (AD) increased rapidly in incidence among Standard Poodles after the mid-twentieth century. Previous attempts to identify specific genetic causes using genome wide association studies and interrogation of the dog leukocyte antigen (DLA) region have been non-productive. However, such studies led us to hypothesize that positive selection for desired phenotypic traits that arose in the mid-twentieth century led to intense inbreeding and the inadvertent amplification of AD and SA associated traits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This hypothesis was tested with genetic studies of 761 Standard, Miniature, and Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses from the USA, Canada and Europe, coupled with extensive pedigree analysis of thousands more dogs. Genome-wide diversity across the world-wide population was measured using a panel of 33 short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Allele frequency data were also used to determine the internal relatedness of individual dogs within the population as a whole. Assays based on linkage between STR genomic loci and DLA genes were used to identify class I and II haplotypes and disease associations. Genetic diversity statistics based on genomic STR markers indicated that Standard Poodles from North America and Europe were closely related and reasonably diverse across the breed. However, genetic diversity statistics, internal relatedness, principal coordinate analysis, and DLA haplotype frequencies showed a marked imbalance with 30 % of the diversity in 70 % of the dogs. Standard Poodles with SA and AD were strongly linked to this inbred population, with dogs suffering with SA being the most inbred. No single strong association was found between STR defined DLA class I or II haplotypes and SA or AD in the breed as a whole, although certain haplotypes present in a minority of the population appeared to confer moderate degrees of risk or protection against either or both diseases. Dogs possessing minor DLA class I haplotypes were half as likely to develop SA or AD as dogs with common haplotypes. Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses being used for outcrossing were more genetically diverse than Standard Poodles and genetically distinguishable across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ancestral genetic polymorphisms responsible for SA and AD entered Standard Poodles through separate lineages, AD earlier and SA later, and were increasingly fixed by a period of close linebreeding that was related to popular bloodlines from the mid-twentieth century. This event has become known as the midcentury bottleneck or MCB. Sustained positive selection resulted in a marked imbalance in genetic diversity across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region. Both SA and AD were concentrated among the most inbred dogs, with genetic outliers being relatively disease free. No specific genetic markers other than those reflecting the degree of inbreeding were consistently associated with either disease. Standard Poodles as a whole remain genetically diverse, but steps should be taken to rebalance diversity using genetic outliers and if necessary, outcrosses to phenotypically similar but genetically distinct breeds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canine genetics and epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canine genetics and epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canine genetics and epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-015-0026-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

背景:皮脂腺炎(SA)和Addison病(AD)的发病率在20世纪中期之后迅速增加。先前使用全基因组关联研究和犬白细胞抗原(DLA)区域鉴定特定遗传原因的尝试都是无效的。然而,这些研究使我们假设,20世纪中期出现的对所需表型性状的积极选择导致了强烈的近亲繁殖和AD和SA相关性状的无意扩增。结果:通过对来自美国、加拿大和欧洲的761只标准、迷你和迷你/标准贵宾犬的遗传研究,以及对数千只狗的广泛谱系分析,验证了这一假设。利用33个短串联重复序列(STR)位点测定了世界范围内人群的全基因组多样性。等位基因频率数据也被用来确定整个种群中单个狗的内部亲缘关系。基于STR基因组位点和DLA基因之间的连锁分析用于鉴定I类和II类单倍型和疾病关联。基于基因组STR标记的遗传多样性统计表明,来自北美和欧洲的标准贵宾亲缘关系密切,在品种上具有合理的多样性。然而,遗传多样性统计、内部亲缘性、主坐标分析和DLA单倍型频率显示,70%的狗的30%的多样性存在明显的不平衡。患有SA和AD的标准贵宾犬与近亲繁殖的人群密切相关,患有SA的狗是近亲繁殖最多的。STR定义的DLA I类或II类单倍型与整个品种的SA或AD之间没有发现单一的强关联,尽管少数人群中存在的某些单倍型似乎赋予了中等程度的风险或对其中一种或两种疾病的保护。拥有少量DLA I类单倍型的狗患SA或AD的可能性是拥有普通单倍型的狗的一半。用于异型杂交的迷你/标准贵宾犬比标准贵宾犬更具遗传多样性,并且在基因组和DLA I类和II类区域具有遗传可区分性。结论:导致SA和AD的祖先遗传多态性通过不同的谱系进入标准贵宾犬,AD较早,SA较晚,并且在20世纪中期与流行血统相关的一段近系育种时期日益固定。这一事件被称为世纪中期瓶颈或MCB。持续的正选择导致整个基因组和DLA I类和II类区域的遗传多样性显著不平衡。SA和AD都集中在大多数近亲繁殖的狗中,遗传异常值相对没有疾病。除了反映近亲繁殖程度的遗传标记外,没有特定的遗传标记与这两种疾病始终相关。标准贵宾犬整体上保持遗传多样性,但应采取措施,利用遗传异常值重新平衡多样性,必要时,通过异种杂交获得表型相似但基因不同的品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles, sebaceous adenitis and Addison's disease.

The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles, sebaceous adenitis and Addison's disease.

The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles, sebaceous adenitis and Addison's disease.

The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles, sebaceous adenitis and Addison's disease.

Background: Sebaceous adenitis (SA) and Addison's disease (AD) increased rapidly in incidence among Standard Poodles after the mid-twentieth century. Previous attempts to identify specific genetic causes using genome wide association studies and interrogation of the dog leukocyte antigen (DLA) region have been non-productive. However, such studies led us to hypothesize that positive selection for desired phenotypic traits that arose in the mid-twentieth century led to intense inbreeding and the inadvertent amplification of AD and SA associated traits.

Results: This hypothesis was tested with genetic studies of 761 Standard, Miniature, and Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses from the USA, Canada and Europe, coupled with extensive pedigree analysis of thousands more dogs. Genome-wide diversity across the world-wide population was measured using a panel of 33 short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Allele frequency data were also used to determine the internal relatedness of individual dogs within the population as a whole. Assays based on linkage between STR genomic loci and DLA genes were used to identify class I and II haplotypes and disease associations. Genetic diversity statistics based on genomic STR markers indicated that Standard Poodles from North America and Europe were closely related and reasonably diverse across the breed. However, genetic diversity statistics, internal relatedness, principal coordinate analysis, and DLA haplotype frequencies showed a marked imbalance with 30 % of the diversity in 70 % of the dogs. Standard Poodles with SA and AD were strongly linked to this inbred population, with dogs suffering with SA being the most inbred. No single strong association was found between STR defined DLA class I or II haplotypes and SA or AD in the breed as a whole, although certain haplotypes present in a minority of the population appeared to confer moderate degrees of risk or protection against either or both diseases. Dogs possessing minor DLA class I haplotypes were half as likely to develop SA or AD as dogs with common haplotypes. Miniature/Standard Poodle crosses being used for outcrossing were more genetically diverse than Standard Poodles and genetically distinguishable across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region.

Conclusions: Ancestral genetic polymorphisms responsible for SA and AD entered Standard Poodles through separate lineages, AD earlier and SA later, and were increasingly fixed by a period of close linebreeding that was related to popular bloodlines from the mid-twentieth century. This event has become known as the midcentury bottleneck or MCB. Sustained positive selection resulted in a marked imbalance in genetic diversity across the genome and in the DLA class I and II region. Both SA and AD were concentrated among the most inbred dogs, with genetic outliers being relatively disease free. No specific genetic markers other than those reflecting the degree of inbreeding were consistently associated with either disease. Standard Poodles as a whole remain genetically diverse, but steps should be taken to rebalance diversity using genetic outliers and if necessary, outcrosses to phenotypically similar but genetically distinct breeds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信