标准和定义之外:与Banff 2009标准诊断方案不同的标准化抗体介导排斥反应方案的结果。

Clinical transplants Pub Date : 2014-01-01
TrisAnn Rendulic, Daniel S Ramon, Paul D Killen, Milagros Samaniego-Picota, Jeong M Park
{"title":"标准和定义之外:与Banff 2009标准诊断方案不同的标准化抗体介导排斥反应方案的结果。","authors":"TrisAnn Rendulic,&nbsp;Daniel S Ramon,&nbsp;Paul D Killen,&nbsp;Milagros Samaniego-Picota,&nbsp;Jeong M Park","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new clinical diagnostic schema is needed for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients due to the limited utility of C4d staining, lack of standardized quantitative tests for donor specific antibodies, and potential new diagnostic markers. The treatment of AMR remains controversial because previous studies included heterogeneous treatment modalities, small sample sizes, and short follow-up time. At the University of Michigan Transplant Center, 26 patients were diagnosed with AMR based on our diagnostic protocol including C4d-negative AMR in thesetting of graft dysfunction and Banff tissue injury type II (capillaritis) or type III (arteritis). After diagnosis, these patients received six sessions of plasmapheresis (PP) and IVIG (100 mg/kg after the first to fifth PP and 500 mg/kg with the last PP). Our novel finding in this analysis was the association between persistent C1q detection and graft loss. We confirmed that C4d positivity at diagnosis is associated with worse outcomes. Also, we found that response to our treatment protocol is dependent on C4d staining and Banff tissue injury type.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"179-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Criteria and Definitions: Outcome of a Standardized Antibody-Mediated Rejection Protocol with a Diagnostic Schema Different from the Banff 2009 Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"TrisAnn Rendulic,&nbsp;Daniel S Ramon,&nbsp;Paul D Killen,&nbsp;Milagros Samaniego-Picota,&nbsp;Jeong M Park\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A new clinical diagnostic schema is needed for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients due to the limited utility of C4d staining, lack of standardized quantitative tests for donor specific antibodies, and potential new diagnostic markers. The treatment of AMR remains controversial because previous studies included heterogeneous treatment modalities, small sample sizes, and short follow-up time. At the University of Michigan Transplant Center, 26 patients were diagnosed with AMR based on our diagnostic protocol including C4d-negative AMR in thesetting of graft dysfunction and Banff tissue injury type II (capillaritis) or type III (arteritis). After diagnosis, these patients received six sessions of plasmapheresis (PP) and IVIG (100 mg/kg after the first to fifth PP and 500 mg/kg with the last PP). Our novel finding in this analysis was the association between persistent C1q detection and graft loss. We confirmed that C4d positivity at diagnosis is associated with worse outcomes. Also, we found that response to our treatment protocol is dependent on C4d staining and Banff tissue injury type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"179-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical transplants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于C4d染色的实用性有限,缺乏供体特异性抗体的标准化定量测试,以及潜在的新诊断标记,需要一种新的临床诊断方案来诊断肾移植受者的抗体介导性排斥反应(AMR)。AMR的治疗仍然存在争议,因为以前的研究包括不均匀的治疗方式、小样本量和短随访时间。在密歇根大学移植中心,根据我们的诊断方案,26例患者被诊断为AMR,其中包括移植物功能障碍和班夫组织损伤II型(毛细血管炎)或III型(动脉炎)的c4d阴性AMR。诊断后,这些患者接受6次血浆置换(PP)和IVIG(第1 ~ 5次PP后100 mg/kg,最后一次PP后500 mg/kg)。在这项分析中,我们的新发现是持续的C1q检测与移植物损失之间的联系。我们证实诊断时C4d阳性与较差的预后相关。此外,我们发现对我们的治疗方案的反应取决于C4d染色和班夫组织损伤类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Criteria and Definitions: Outcome of a Standardized Antibody-Mediated Rejection Protocol with a Diagnostic Schema Different from the Banff 2009 Criteria.

A new clinical diagnostic schema is needed for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients due to the limited utility of C4d staining, lack of standardized quantitative tests for donor specific antibodies, and potential new diagnostic markers. The treatment of AMR remains controversial because previous studies included heterogeneous treatment modalities, small sample sizes, and short follow-up time. At the University of Michigan Transplant Center, 26 patients were diagnosed with AMR based on our diagnostic protocol including C4d-negative AMR in thesetting of graft dysfunction and Banff tissue injury type II (capillaritis) or type III (arteritis). After diagnosis, these patients received six sessions of plasmapheresis (PP) and IVIG (100 mg/kg after the first to fifth PP and 500 mg/kg with the last PP). Our novel finding in this analysis was the association between persistent C1q detection and graft loss. We confirmed that C4d positivity at diagnosis is associated with worse outcomes. Also, we found that response to our treatment protocol is dependent on C4d staining and Banff tissue injury type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信