神经影像学的偶然发现:伦理和医学法律的考虑。

Neuroscience journal Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-20 DOI:10.1155/2013/439145
Lawrence Leung
{"title":"神经影像学的偶然发现:伦理和医学法律的考虑。","authors":"Lawrence Leung","doi":"10.1155/2013/439145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rapid advances in neurosciences in the last three decades, there has been an exponential increase in the use of neuroimaging both in basic sciences and clinical research involving human subjects. During routine neuroimaging, incidental findings that are not part of the protocol or scope of research agenda can occur and they often pose a challenge as to how they should be handled to abide by the medicolegal principles of research ethics. This paper reviews the issue from various ethical (do no harm, general duty to rescue, and mutual benefits and owing) and medicolegal perspectives (legal liability, fiduciary duties, Law of Tort, and Law of Contract) with a suggested protocol of approach. </p>","PeriodicalId":91144,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience journal","volume":"2013 ","pages":"439145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/439145","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging: Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/439145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the rapid advances in neurosciences in the last three decades, there has been an exponential increase in the use of neuroimaging both in basic sciences and clinical research involving human subjects. During routine neuroimaging, incidental findings that are not part of the protocol or scope of research agenda can occur and they often pose a challenge as to how they should be handled to abide by the medicolegal principles of research ethics. This paper reviews the issue from various ethical (do no harm, general duty to rescue, and mutual benefits and owing) and medicolegal perspectives (legal liability, fiduciary duties, Law of Tort, and Law of Contract) with a suggested protocol of approach. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience journal\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"439145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/439145\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/439145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/439145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在过去的三十年里,随着神经科学的快速发展,神经影像学在基础科学和涉及人类受试者的临床研究中的应用呈指数级增长。在常规神经成像过程中,可能会出现不属于协议或研究议程范围的偶然发现,它们通常对如何处理这些发现以遵守研究伦理的医学法律原则构成挑战。本文从伦理学(不伤害、一般救助义务、互惠互利)和医学法(法律责任、信义义务、侵权行为法和合同法)的角度对这一问题进行了回顾,并提出了建议的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging: Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations.

Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging: Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations.

Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging: Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations.

With the rapid advances in neurosciences in the last three decades, there has been an exponential increase in the use of neuroimaging both in basic sciences and clinical research involving human subjects. During routine neuroimaging, incidental findings that are not part of the protocol or scope of research agenda can occur and they often pose a challenge as to how they should be handled to abide by the medicolegal principles of research ethics. This paper reviews the issue from various ethical (do no harm, general duty to rescue, and mutual benefits and owing) and medicolegal perspectives (legal liability, fiduciary duties, Law of Tort, and Law of Contract) with a suggested protocol of approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信