Caitlin E Kennedy, Laura J Bernard, Kathryn E Muessig, Kelika A Konda, Elie A Akl, Ying-Ru Lo, Antonio Gerbase, Kevin R O'Reilly
{"title":"艾滋病毒阴性男男性行为者和跨性别者的血清分拣和艾滋病毒/性传播感染:为世卫组织指南提供信息的系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Caitlin E Kennedy, Laura J Bernard, Kathryn E Muessig, Kelika A Konda, Elie A Akl, Ying-Ru Lo, Antonio Gerbase, Kevin R O'Reilly","doi":"10.1155/2013/583627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy. </p>","PeriodicalId":90237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","volume":"2013 ","pages":"583627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/583627","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin E Kennedy, Laura J Bernard, Kathryn E Muessig, Kelika A Konda, Elie A Akl, Ying-Ru Lo, Antonio Gerbase, Kevin R O'Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/583627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"583627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/583627\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/583627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/583627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy.