如何用统计数字说明真相:以团队为基础的科学中负责任的数据分析案例》(How Tell Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science)。

Jonathan A L Gelfond, Craig M Klugman, Leah J Welty, Elizabeth Heitman, Christopher Louden, Brad H Pollock
{"title":"如何用统计数字说明真相:以团队为基础的科学中负责任的数据分析案例》(How Tell Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science)。","authors":"Jonathan A L Gelfond, Craig M Klugman, Leah J Welty, Elizabeth Heitman, Christopher Louden, Brad H Pollock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data analysis is essential to translational medicine, epidemiology, and the scientific process. Although recent advances in promoting reproducibility and reporting standards have made some improvements, the data analysis process remains insufficiently documented and susceptible to avoidable errors, bias, and even fraud. Comprehensively accounting for the full analytical process requires not only records of the statistical methodology used, but also records of communications among the research team. In this regard, the data analysis process can benefit from the principle of accountability that is inherent in other disciplines such as clinical practice. We propose a novel framework for capturing the analytical narrative called the Accountable Data Analysis Process (ADAP), which allows the entire research team to participate in the analysis in a supervised and transparent way. The framework is analogous to an electronic health record in which the dataset is the \"patient\" and actions related to the dataset are recorded in a project management system. We discuss the design, advantages, and challenges in implementing this type of system in the context of academic health centers, where team based science increasingly demands accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":90635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539260/pdf/nihms699844.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan A L Gelfond, Craig M Klugman, Leah J Welty, Elizabeth Heitman, Christopher Louden, Brad H Pollock\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data analysis is essential to translational medicine, epidemiology, and the scientific process. Although recent advances in promoting reproducibility and reporting standards have made some improvements, the data analysis process remains insufficiently documented and susceptible to avoidable errors, bias, and even fraud. Comprehensively accounting for the full analytical process requires not only records of the statistical methodology used, but also records of communications among the research team. In this regard, the data analysis process can benefit from the principle of accountability that is inherent in other disciplines such as clinical practice. We propose a novel framework for capturing the analytical narrative called the Accountable Data Analysis Process (ADAP), which allows the entire research team to participate in the analysis in a supervised and transparent way. The framework is analogous to an electronic health record in which the dataset is the \\\"patient\\\" and actions related to the dataset are recorded in a project management system. We discuss the design, advantages, and challenges in implementing this type of system in the context of academic health centers, where team based science increasingly demands accountability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539260/pdf/nihms699844.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据分析对转化医学、流行病学和科学进程至关重要。尽管最近在促进可重复性和报告标准方面取得了一些进步,但数据分析过程的记录仍然不足,容易出现可避免的错误、偏差甚至欺诈。要全面说明整个分析过程,不仅需要记录所使用的统计方法,还需要记录研究团队之间的交流。在这方面,数据分析过程可以借鉴临床实践等其他学科固有的问责原则。我们提出了一个新颖的分析叙述框架,称为 "负责任的数据分析过程"(ADAP),它允许整个研究团队以受监督和透明的方式参与分析。该框架类似于电子病历,其中数据集是 "病人",与数据集相关的操作记录在项目管理系统中。我们讨论了在学术健康中心实施这类系统的设计、优势和挑战,在学术健康中心,基于团队的科学越来越需要问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science.

How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science.

How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science.

Data analysis is essential to translational medicine, epidemiology, and the scientific process. Although recent advances in promoting reproducibility and reporting standards have made some improvements, the data analysis process remains insufficiently documented and susceptible to avoidable errors, bias, and even fraud. Comprehensively accounting for the full analytical process requires not only records of the statistical methodology used, but also records of communications among the research team. In this regard, the data analysis process can benefit from the principle of accountability that is inherent in other disciplines such as clinical practice. We propose a novel framework for capturing the analytical narrative called the Accountable Data Analysis Process (ADAP), which allows the entire research team to participate in the analysis in a supervised and transparent way. The framework is analogous to an electronic health record in which the dataset is the "patient" and actions related to the dataset are recorded in a project management system. We discuss the design, advantages, and challenges in implementing this type of system in the context of academic health centers, where team based science increasingly demands accountability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信