负压伤口灌注治疗(NPWTi)比单纯负压伤口治疗能更好地减少慢性感染下肢伤口清创后的生物负担

S.G. Goss MD , J.A. Schwartz MD , F. Facchin MD , E. Avdagic BA , C. Gendics RN , J.C. Lantis II MD
{"title":"负压伤口灌注治疗(NPWTi)比单纯负压伤口治疗能更好地减少慢性感染下肢伤口清创后的生物负担","authors":"S.G. Goss MD ,&nbsp;J.A. Schwartz MD ,&nbsp;F. Facchin MD ,&nbsp;E. Avdagic BA ,&nbsp;C. Gendics RN ,&nbsp;J.C. Lantis II MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>An overabundance of bacteria in the chronic wound plays a significant role in the decreased ability for primary closure. One means of decreasing the bioburden<span> in a wound is to operatively debride the wound for wound bed optimization prior to application of other therapy, such as Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). We undertook a prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy of wound bed preparation for a standard algorithm (sharp surgical </span></span>debridement followed by NPWT) versus one employing sharp surgical debridement followed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation (NPWTi).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirteen patients, corresponding to 16 chronic lower leg and foot wounds were taken to the operating room for debridement. The patients were sequentially enrolled in 2 treatment groups: the first receiving treatment with operative debridement followed by 1 week of NPWT with the instillation of quarter strength bleach solution; the other receiving a standard algorithm consisting of operative debridement and 1 week of NPWT. Quantitative cultures were taken pre-operatively after sterile preparation and draping of the wound site (POD # 0, pre-op), post-operatively once debridement was completed (POD # 0, post-op), and on post-operative day 7 after operative debridement (POD # 7, post-op).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After operative debridement (post-operative day 0) there was a mean of 3 (±1) types of bacteria per wound. The mean CFU/gram tissue culture was statistically greater – 3.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±4 × 10<sup>6</sup>) in the NPWTi group, while in the standard group (NPWT) the mean was 1.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±2.36 × 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/gram tissue culture (<em>p</em> = 0.016); at the end of therapy there was no statistical difference between the two groups (<em>p</em> = 0.44). Wounds treated with NPWTi had a mean of 2.6 × 10<sup>5</sup> (±3 × 10<sup>5</sup>) CFU/gram of tissue culture while wounds treated with NPWT had a mean of 2.79 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±3.18 × 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/gram of tissue culture (<em>p</em> = 0.43). The mean absolute reduction in bacteria for the NPWTi group was 10.6 × 10<sup>6</sup> bacteria per gram of tissue while there was a mean absolute increase in bacteria for the NPWT group of 28.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> bacteria per gram of tissue, therefore there was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute bioburden in those wounds treated with NPWTi (<em>p</em> = 0.016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It has long been realized that NPWT does not make its greatest impact by bioburden reduction. Other work has demonstrated that debridement alone does not reduce wound bioburden by more than 1 Log. Wounds treated with NPWTi (in this case with quarter strength bleach instillation solution) had a statistically significant reduction in bioburden, while wounds treated with NPWT had an increase in bioburden over the 7 days.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90358,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001","citationCount":"79","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation (NPWTi) Better Reduces Post-debridement Bioburden in Chronically Infected Lower Extremity Wounds Than NPWT Alone\",\"authors\":\"S.G. Goss MD ,&nbsp;J.A. Schwartz MD ,&nbsp;F. Facchin MD ,&nbsp;E. Avdagic BA ,&nbsp;C. Gendics RN ,&nbsp;J.C. Lantis II MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>An overabundance of bacteria in the chronic wound plays a significant role in the decreased ability for primary closure. One means of decreasing the bioburden<span> in a wound is to operatively debride the wound for wound bed optimization prior to application of other therapy, such as Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). We undertook a prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy of wound bed preparation for a standard algorithm (sharp surgical </span></span>debridement followed by NPWT) versus one employing sharp surgical debridement followed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation (NPWTi).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirteen patients, corresponding to 16 chronic lower leg and foot wounds were taken to the operating room for debridement. The patients were sequentially enrolled in 2 treatment groups: the first receiving treatment with operative debridement followed by 1 week of NPWT with the instillation of quarter strength bleach solution; the other receiving a standard algorithm consisting of operative debridement and 1 week of NPWT. Quantitative cultures were taken pre-operatively after sterile preparation and draping of the wound site (POD # 0, pre-op), post-operatively once debridement was completed (POD # 0, post-op), and on post-operative day 7 after operative debridement (POD # 7, post-op).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After operative debridement (post-operative day 0) there was a mean of 3 (±1) types of bacteria per wound. The mean CFU/gram tissue culture was statistically greater – 3.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±4 × 10<sup>6</sup>) in the NPWTi group, while in the standard group (NPWT) the mean was 1.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±2.36 × 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/gram tissue culture (<em>p</em> = 0.016); at the end of therapy there was no statistical difference between the two groups (<em>p</em> = 0.44). Wounds treated with NPWTi had a mean of 2.6 × 10<sup>5</sup> (±3 × 10<sup>5</sup>) CFU/gram of tissue culture while wounds treated with NPWT had a mean of 2.79 × 10<sup>6</sup> (±3.18 × 10<sup>6</sup>) CFU/gram of tissue culture (<em>p</em> = 0.43). The mean absolute reduction in bacteria for the NPWTi group was 10.6 × 10<sup>6</sup> bacteria per gram of tissue while there was a mean absolute increase in bacteria for the NPWT group of 28.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> bacteria per gram of tissue, therefore there was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute bioburden in those wounds treated with NPWTi (<em>p</em> = 0.016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It has long been realized that NPWT does not make its greatest impact by bioburden reduction. Other work has demonstrated that debridement alone does not reduce wound bioburden by more than 1 Log. Wounds treated with NPWTi (in this case with quarter strength bleach instillation solution) had a statistically significant reduction in bioburden, while wounds treated with NPWT had an increase in bioburden over the 7 days.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"79\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510314000049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510314000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

摘要

目的慢性创面细菌过多是导致创面一期愈合能力下降的重要原因。减少伤口中生物负担的一种方法是在应用其他治疗方法(如负压伤口治疗(NPWT))之前对伤口进行手术清创,以优化伤口床。我们进行了一项前瞻性试点研究,以评估标准算法(急剧手术清创后NPWT)与采用急剧手术清创后负压伤口灌注治疗(NPWTi)的伤口床准备的效果。方法对16例慢性下肢及足部伤口的13例患者进行手术清创。患者按顺序分为2个治疗组:第一组接受手术清创治疗,随后给予1周NPWT并灌注四分之一强度漂白剂溶液;另一组接受标准的手术清创和1周的NPWT治疗。术前无菌准备和包扎创面后(POD # 0,术前)、术后清创完成后(POD # 0,术后)和术后清创第7天(POD # 7,术后)分别进行定量培养。结果手术清创后(术后第0天),平均每个创面有3(±1)种细菌。NPWTi组平均CFU/克组织培养值为3.7 × 106(±4 × 106),而标准组(NPWT)平均为1.8 × 106(±2.36 × 106) CFU/克组织培养值(p = 0.016);治疗结束时,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.44)。NPWTi处理的创面组织培养物平均为2.6 × 105(±3 × 105) CFU/g, NPWT处理的创面组织培养物平均为2.79 × 106(±3.18 × 106) CFU/g (p = 0.43)。NPWTi组的细菌平均绝对减少量为每克组织10.6 × 106个细菌,而NPWT组的细菌平均绝对增加量为每克组织28.7 × 106个细菌,因此NPWTi处理的伤口绝对生物负荷降低具有统计学意义(p = 0.016)。结论人们早就认识到,NPWT的最大影响并非来自于生物负荷的减少。其他研究表明,单纯清创不能减少伤口生物负荷1 Log以上。用NPWTi处理的伤口(在这种情况下使用四分之一强度的漂白剂灌注溶液)在统计上显著减少了生物负担,而用NPWT处理的伤口在7天内生物负担增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation (NPWTi) Better Reduces Post-debridement Bioburden in Chronically Infected Lower Extremity Wounds Than NPWT Alone

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation (NPWTi) Better Reduces Post-debridement Bioburden in Chronically Infected Lower Extremity Wounds Than NPWT Alone

Objective

An overabundance of bacteria in the chronic wound plays a significant role in the decreased ability for primary closure. One means of decreasing the bioburden in a wound is to operatively debride the wound for wound bed optimization prior to application of other therapy, such as Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). We undertook a prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy of wound bed preparation for a standard algorithm (sharp surgical debridement followed by NPWT) versus one employing sharp surgical debridement followed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation (NPWTi).

Methods

Thirteen patients, corresponding to 16 chronic lower leg and foot wounds were taken to the operating room for debridement. The patients were sequentially enrolled in 2 treatment groups: the first receiving treatment with operative debridement followed by 1 week of NPWT with the instillation of quarter strength bleach solution; the other receiving a standard algorithm consisting of operative debridement and 1 week of NPWT. Quantitative cultures were taken pre-operatively after sterile preparation and draping of the wound site (POD # 0, pre-op), post-operatively once debridement was completed (POD # 0, post-op), and on post-operative day 7 after operative debridement (POD # 7, post-op).

Results

After operative debridement (post-operative day 0) there was a mean of 3 (±1) types of bacteria per wound. The mean CFU/gram tissue culture was statistically greater – 3.7 × 106 (±4 × 106) in the NPWTi group, while in the standard group (NPWT) the mean was 1.8 × 106 (±2.36 × 106) CFU/gram tissue culture (p = 0.016); at the end of therapy there was no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.44). Wounds treated with NPWTi had a mean of 2.6 × 105 (±3 × 105) CFU/gram of tissue culture while wounds treated with NPWT had a mean of 2.79 × 106 (±3.18 × 106) CFU/gram of tissue culture (p = 0.43). The mean absolute reduction in bacteria for the NPWTi group was 10.6 × 106 bacteria per gram of tissue while there was a mean absolute increase in bacteria for the NPWT group of 28.7 × 106 bacteria per gram of tissue, therefore there was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute bioburden in those wounds treated with NPWTi (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

It has long been realized that NPWT does not make its greatest impact by bioburden reduction. Other work has demonstrated that debridement alone does not reduce wound bioburden by more than 1 Log. Wounds treated with NPWTi (in this case with quarter strength bleach instillation solution) had a statistically significant reduction in bioburden, while wounds treated with NPWT had an increase in bioburden over the 7 days.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信