成人便秘。

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-08-05
Michelle Lau, Alexander C Ford
{"title":"成人便秘。","authors":"Michelle Lau,&nbsp;Alexander C Ford","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there are defined criteria for the diagnosis of constipation, in practice, diagnostic criteria are less rigid and depend in part on the perception of normal bowel habit. Constipation is highly prevalent, with approximately 12 million general practitioner prescriptions for laxatives in England in 2001.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of medications in people with idiopathic chronic constipation? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 356 studies published in this time period. After deduplication, 95 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 62 studies and the further review of 33 full publications. Of the 33 full articles evaluated, three systematic reviews and one RCT were added to the overview at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for four PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for three interventions, based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of linaclotide, lubiprostone, and prucalopride.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526959/pdf/2015-0413.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constipation in adults.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Lau,&nbsp;Alexander C Ford\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there are defined criteria for the diagnosis of constipation, in practice, diagnostic criteria are less rigid and depend in part on the perception of normal bowel habit. Constipation is highly prevalent, with approximately 12 million general practitioner prescriptions for laxatives in England in 2001.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of medications in people with idiopathic chronic constipation? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 356 studies published in this time period. After deduplication, 95 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 62 studies and the further review of 33 full publications. Of the 33 full articles evaluated, three systematic reviews and one RCT were added to the overview at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for four PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for three interventions, based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of linaclotide, lubiprostone, and prucalopride.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526959/pdf/2015-0413.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:虽然便秘的诊断有明确的标准,但在实践中,诊断标准并不那么严格,部分取决于对正常排便习惯的感知。便秘非常普遍,2001年英国大约有1200万名全科医生开了泻药处方。方法和结果:我们进行了系统的综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:药物对特发性慢性便秘患者的影响是什么?我们检索了截至2014年7月的Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据综述定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取最新版本的评论)。结果:在本次更新中,检索电子数据库检索到这一时期发表的356项研究。重复数据删除后,筛选了95条记录以纳入概述。对标题和摘要的评估排除了62项研究,并进一步审查了33篇完整的出版物。在评估的33篇全文中,本次更新的综述中增加了3篇系统综述和1篇随机对照试验。我们对四种PICO组合进行了GRADE评价。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们根据利那洛肽、鲁比前列酮和普鲁卡必利的有效性和安全性信息,对三种干预措施的疗效进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constipation in adults.

Introduction: Although there are defined criteria for the diagnosis of constipation, in practice, diagnostic criteria are less rigid and depend in part on the perception of normal bowel habit. Constipation is highly prevalent, with approximately 12 million general practitioner prescriptions for laxatives in England in 2001.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of medications in people with idiopathic chronic constipation? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 356 studies published in this time period. After deduplication, 95 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 62 studies and the further review of 33 full publications. Of the 33 full articles evaluated, three systematic reviews and one RCT were added to the overview at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for four PICO combinations.

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for three interventions, based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of linaclotide, lubiprostone, and prucalopride.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信