Ghadeer Abdullah Alsager, Khalid Alzahrani, Fahad Alshayhan, Raghad A Alotaibi, Khalid Murrad, Orfan Arafah
{"title":"舟舟副骨的患病率和分类:一份医疗记录回顾。","authors":"Ghadeer Abdullah Alsager, Khalid Alzahrani, Fahad Alshayhan, Raghad A Alotaibi, Khalid Murrad, Orfan Arafah","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accessory navicular bone (ANB) is one of the most common accessory bones in the foot. Certain pathologies, such as posterior tibial tendon insufficiency are associated with ANB, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures such as navicular tuberosity avulsion fractures. There are few studies addressing the prevalence and types of ANB in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine the prevalence and morphological variations of ANB and its relation with age and sex in patients visiting foot and ankle clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medical record review SETTING: Orthopedic foot and ankle clinic at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The presence of ANB was retrospectively analyzed in radiographs from patients who presented to the orthopedic foot and ankle at our university hospital from February 2010 to December 2020. The patients were stratified according to sex, age, and diagnosis. For each ANB, recorded information included site, size, classification, subtypes, and symptomatology. Purposive sampling was used to select the patients for the study (non-probability sampling).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Prevalence of ANB in patients attending a foot and ankle clinic.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>117 patients and 194 feet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANB was analyzed in 1006 radiographs from 503 patients. ANB was detected in 117 (23.3%) patients and 194 (19.3%) feet Prevalence was significantly higher in females (67.5%) than in males (32.5%) (Z=5.359, <i>P</i><.001). The ages ranged from 19 to 86 years, with a mean age of 48.26 (14.5) years. The most common site was bilateral (77 patients, 65.8 %). Type I was the most common type, with a prevalence of 42.1%. There were no significant differences in types in relation to sex, but all types and subtypes differed significantly from each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANB was common among patients presenting to the foot and ankle clinic, with an overall prevalence of 23.3%. It should be considered among the differential diagnosis in chronic foot pain, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures. Further studies with a larger, randomized sample are needed, for more accuracy and to confirm the reported results.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective chart review, non-probability sampling, and use of plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"327-333"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/ea/0256-4947.2022.327.PMC9557784.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and classification of accessory navicular bone: a medical record review.\",\"authors\":\"Ghadeer Abdullah Alsager, Khalid Alzahrani, Fahad Alshayhan, Raghad A Alotaibi, Khalid Murrad, Orfan Arafah\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accessory navicular bone (ANB) is one of the most common accessory bones in the foot. Certain pathologies, such as posterior tibial tendon insufficiency are associated with ANB, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures such as navicular tuberosity avulsion fractures. There are few studies addressing the prevalence and types of ANB in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine the prevalence and morphological variations of ANB and its relation with age and sex in patients visiting foot and ankle clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Medical record review SETTING: Orthopedic foot and ankle clinic at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The presence of ANB was retrospectively analyzed in radiographs from patients who presented to the orthopedic foot and ankle at our university hospital from February 2010 to December 2020. The patients were stratified according to sex, age, and diagnosis. For each ANB, recorded information included site, size, classification, subtypes, and symptomatology. Purposive sampling was used to select the patients for the study (non-probability sampling).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Prevalence of ANB in patients attending a foot and ankle clinic.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>117 patients and 194 feet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANB was analyzed in 1006 radiographs from 503 patients. ANB was detected in 117 (23.3%) patients and 194 (19.3%) feet Prevalence was significantly higher in females (67.5%) than in males (32.5%) (Z=5.359, <i>P</i><.001). The ages ranged from 19 to 86 years, with a mean age of 48.26 (14.5) years. The most common site was bilateral (77 patients, 65.8 %). Type I was the most common type, with a prevalence of 42.1%. There were no significant differences in types in relation to sex, but all types and subtypes differed significantly from each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANB was common among patients presenting to the foot and ankle clinic, with an overall prevalence of 23.3%. It should be considered among the differential diagnosis in chronic foot pain, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures. Further studies with a larger, randomized sample are needed, for more accuracy and to confirm the reported results.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective chart review, non-probability sampling, and use of plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"327-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/ea/0256-4947.2022.327.PMC9557784.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.327\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence and classification of accessory navicular bone: a medical record review.
Background: The accessory navicular bone (ANB) is one of the most common accessory bones in the foot. Certain pathologies, such as posterior tibial tendon insufficiency are associated with ANB, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures such as navicular tuberosity avulsion fractures. There are few studies addressing the prevalence and types of ANB in Saudi Arabia.
Objectives: Determine the prevalence and morphological variations of ANB and its relation with age and sex in patients visiting foot and ankle clinics.
Design: Medical record review SETTING: Orthopedic foot and ankle clinic at a university hospital.
Patients and methods: The presence of ANB was retrospectively analyzed in radiographs from patients who presented to the orthopedic foot and ankle at our university hospital from February 2010 to December 2020. The patients were stratified according to sex, age, and diagnosis. For each ANB, recorded information included site, size, classification, subtypes, and symptomatology. Purposive sampling was used to select the patients for the study (non-probability sampling).
Main outcome measures: Prevalence of ANB in patients attending a foot and ankle clinic.
Sample size: 117 patients and 194 feet.
Results: ANB was analyzed in 1006 radiographs from 503 patients. ANB was detected in 117 (23.3%) patients and 194 (19.3%) feet Prevalence was significantly higher in females (67.5%) than in males (32.5%) (Z=5.359, P<.001). The ages ranged from 19 to 86 years, with a mean age of 48.26 (14.5) years. The most common site was bilateral (77 patients, 65.8 %). Type I was the most common type, with a prevalence of 42.1%. There were no significant differences in types in relation to sex, but all types and subtypes differed significantly from each other.
Conclusion: ANB was common among patients presenting to the foot and ankle clinic, with an overall prevalence of 23.3%. It should be considered among the differential diagnosis in chronic foot pain, and should be differentiated from midfoot and hindfoot fractures. Further studies with a larger, randomized sample are needed, for more accuracy and to confirm the reported results.
Limitations: Retrospective chart review, non-probability sampling, and use of plain radiographs.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.