应变弹性成像与横波弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-06 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319
Rafia Shahzad, Ismat Fatima, Tooba Anjum, Abubaker Shahid
{"title":"应变弹性成像与横波弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值。","authors":"Rafia Shahzad,&nbsp;Ismat Fatima,&nbsp;Tooba Anjum,&nbsp;Abubaker Shahid","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional B-mode breast ultrasonography, though the primary modality to determine benign or malignant nature of a solid breast lesion, sometimes encounters overlapping sonographic morphological features in a single lesion. Elastography leads to improvement by evaluating the structural aspects and characterization of the lesion as benign or malignant on the basis of multi-parametric assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the role of strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional SETTING: Radiology department of hospital PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients meeting inclusion criteria referred to our hospital for ultrasonography followed by biopsy or surgical excisions were examined with B-mode ultrasonography and by both strain and shear wave elastography.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean values of SE and SWE in benign and malignant breast lesions, determination of cutoff using AUC curves and sensitivity and specificity of both techniques.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>One hundred breast lesions from 95 consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) strain elastography ratio in the overall patient population was 4.1 (2.0). Cutoff for benign vs. malignant lesions was 2.86 on the ROC curve. The AUC was 0.911 (95%CI; 0.835-0.988: SE, 0.039) with a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 89.3%. For the SWE kPa values, the ROC curve showed the AUC was 0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.988; SE: 0.030, <i>P</i><.001). Assigning 45.3 as a cut off value provided a sensitivity of 95.8% with a specificity of 85.7%; the positive predictive value was 94.5% and the negative predictive value was 89.6%. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category alone was able to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity 100% keeping the cut off value between 4a and 4b. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979. Combining the three (BI-RADS + SE + SWE) distinguished benign vs. malignant lesions with a sensitivity up to 100% and specificity up to 96.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining SE and SWE as a complementary tool with conventional B-mode ultrasonography has a significant potential for better characterization of solid breast lesions and decreasing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS IVa lesions.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single institution study.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/1c/0256-4947.2022.319.PMC9557788.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Rafia Shahzad,&nbsp;Ismat Fatima,&nbsp;Tooba Anjum,&nbsp;Abubaker Shahid\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional B-mode breast ultrasonography, though the primary modality to determine benign or malignant nature of a solid breast lesion, sometimes encounters overlapping sonographic morphological features in a single lesion. Elastography leads to improvement by evaluating the structural aspects and characterization of the lesion as benign or malignant on the basis of multi-parametric assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the role of strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional SETTING: Radiology department of hospital PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients meeting inclusion criteria referred to our hospital for ultrasonography followed by biopsy or surgical excisions were examined with B-mode ultrasonography and by both strain and shear wave elastography.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean values of SE and SWE in benign and malignant breast lesions, determination of cutoff using AUC curves and sensitivity and specificity of both techniques.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>One hundred breast lesions from 95 consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) strain elastography ratio in the overall patient population was 4.1 (2.0). Cutoff for benign vs. malignant lesions was 2.86 on the ROC curve. The AUC was 0.911 (95%CI; 0.835-0.988: SE, 0.039) with a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 89.3%. For the SWE kPa values, the ROC curve showed the AUC was 0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.988; SE: 0.030, <i>P</i><.001). Assigning 45.3 as a cut off value provided a sensitivity of 95.8% with a specificity of 85.7%; the positive predictive value was 94.5% and the negative predictive value was 89.6%. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category alone was able to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity 100% keeping the cut off value between 4a and 4b. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979. Combining the three (BI-RADS + SE + SWE) distinguished benign vs. malignant lesions with a sensitivity up to 100% and specificity up to 96.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining SE and SWE as a complementary tool with conventional B-mode ultrasonography has a significant potential for better characterization of solid breast lesions and decreasing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS IVa lesions.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single institution study.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"319-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/1c/0256-4947.2022.319.PMC9557788.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统的乳腺b超检查虽然是确定乳腺实性病变良恶性的主要方式,但有时在单个病变中会遇到重叠的超声形态学特征。弹性成像通过在多参数评估的基础上评估病变的结构方面和良恶性特征来改善。目的:探讨应变弹性成像(SE)和横波弹性成像(SWE)在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的作用。设计:横断面设置:医院放射科患者和方法:符合纳入标准的患者转至我院进行超声检查,然后进行活检或手术切除,采用b型超声检查以及应变和剪切波弹性成像检查。主要观察指标:乳腺良恶性病变的SE和SWE平均值,AUC曲线的截点确定,两种技术的敏感性和特异性。样本量:连续95例患者的100个乳腺病变。结果:整个患者群体的平均(SD)应变弹性比为4.1(2.0)。在ROC曲线上,良、恶性病变的截止值为2.86。AUC为0.911 (95%CI;0.835-0.988 (SE, 0.039),敏感性95.8%,特异性89.3%。对于SWE kPa值,ROC曲线显示AUC为0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.988;结论:结合SE和SWE作为常规b超的补充工具,可以更好地表征乳腺实体病变,减少BI-RADS IVa病变的不必要活检。局限性:单机构研究。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Background: Conventional B-mode breast ultrasonography, though the primary modality to determine benign or malignant nature of a solid breast lesion, sometimes encounters overlapping sonographic morphological features in a single lesion. Elastography leads to improvement by evaluating the structural aspects and characterization of the lesion as benign or malignant on the basis of multi-parametric assessment.

Objective: Determine the role of strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Design: Cross sectional SETTING: Radiology department of hospital PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients meeting inclusion criteria referred to our hospital for ultrasonography followed by biopsy or surgical excisions were examined with B-mode ultrasonography and by both strain and shear wave elastography.

Main outcome measures: Mean values of SE and SWE in benign and malignant breast lesions, determination of cutoff using AUC curves and sensitivity and specificity of both techniques.

Sample size: One hundred breast lesions from 95 consecutive patients.

Results: The mean (SD) strain elastography ratio in the overall patient population was 4.1 (2.0). Cutoff for benign vs. malignant lesions was 2.86 on the ROC curve. The AUC was 0.911 (95%CI; 0.835-0.988: SE, 0.039) with a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 89.3%. For the SWE kPa values, the ROC curve showed the AUC was 0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.988; SE: 0.030, P<.001). Assigning 45.3 as a cut off value provided a sensitivity of 95.8% with a specificity of 85.7%; the positive predictive value was 94.5% and the negative predictive value was 89.6%. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category alone was able to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity 100% keeping the cut off value between 4a and 4b. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979. Combining the three (BI-RADS + SE + SWE) distinguished benign vs. malignant lesions with a sensitivity up to 100% and specificity up to 96.3%.

Conclusion: Combining SE and SWE as a complementary tool with conventional B-mode ultrasonography has a significant potential for better characterization of solid breast lesions and decreasing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS IVa lesions.

Limitations: Single institution study.

Conflict of interest: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信