卵巢血管内静脉栓塞技术治疗盆腔静脉充血综合征的疗效观察。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.119807
Sinan Sozutok, Ferhat Can Piskin, Huseyin Tugsan Balli, Hasan Bilen Onan, Omer Kaya, Erol Huseyin Aksungur
{"title":"卵巢血管内静脉栓塞技术治疗盆腔静脉充血综合征的疗效观察。","authors":"Sinan Sozutok,&nbsp;Ferhat Can Piskin,&nbsp;Huseyin Tugsan Balli,&nbsp;Hasan Bilen Onan,&nbsp;Omer Kaya,&nbsp;Erol Huseyin Aksungur","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.119807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pelvic pain, either related or unrelated to menstruation, is especially common in women of reproductive age. Thirty-nine per cent of all women suffer from chronic pelvic pain at some point in their lives, and pelvic venous congestion syndrome (PVCS) is the cause of this pain in 30% of cases. The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the success of endovascular venous embolization used in the treatment of PVCS, and to present the long-term treatment results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The data of 144 female patients who underwent endovascular ovarian vein embolization for PVCS between January 2012 and July 2020 were retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain management was determined to be very successful in 37 (25.6%) patients, successful in 55 (38.1%), and unsuccessful in 52 (35.3%). Treatments using a coil alone were significantly more successful in pain management than those involving the use of different materials in addition to the coil (<i>p</i> = 0.036). In addition, patients with unilateral insufficiency before the procedure were found to have more successful pain management than those with bilateral insufficiency (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Reproductive/postmenopausal state and parity did not have a statistically significant effect on treatment efficacy (<i>p</i> = 0.250 and <i>p</i> = 0.573, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endovascular pelvic venous embolization is an important option in the treatment of PVCS due its less invasive and reproducible nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/fe/PJR-87-47889.PMC9536205.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the endovascular ovarian vein embolization technique in pelvic venous congestion syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Sinan Sozutok,&nbsp;Ferhat Can Piskin,&nbsp;Huseyin Tugsan Balli,&nbsp;Hasan Bilen Onan,&nbsp;Omer Kaya,&nbsp;Erol Huseyin Aksungur\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.119807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pelvic pain, either related or unrelated to menstruation, is especially common in women of reproductive age. Thirty-nine per cent of all women suffer from chronic pelvic pain at some point in their lives, and pelvic venous congestion syndrome (PVCS) is the cause of this pain in 30% of cases. The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the success of endovascular venous embolization used in the treatment of PVCS, and to present the long-term treatment results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The data of 144 female patients who underwent endovascular ovarian vein embolization for PVCS between January 2012 and July 2020 were retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain management was determined to be very successful in 37 (25.6%) patients, successful in 55 (38.1%), and unsuccessful in 52 (35.3%). Treatments using a coil alone were significantly more successful in pain management than those involving the use of different materials in addition to the coil (<i>p</i> = 0.036). In addition, patients with unilateral insufficiency before the procedure were found to have more successful pain management than those with bilateral insufficiency (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Reproductive/postmenopausal state and parity did not have a statistically significant effect on treatment efficacy (<i>p</i> = 0.250 and <i>p</i> = 0.573, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endovascular pelvic venous embolization is an important option in the treatment of PVCS due its less invasive and reproducible nature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/fe/PJR-87-47889.PMC9536205.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:盆腔疼痛,无论是有关或无关月经,是特别常见的育龄妇女。39%的女性在一生中的某个时候患有慢性盆腔疼痛,而盆腔静脉充血综合征(PVCS)是30%的病例中引起这种疼痛的原因。本研究的目的是确定影响血管内静脉栓塞治疗PVCS成功的因素,并呈现长期治疗效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2020年7月144例经腔内卵巢静脉栓塞治疗PVCS的女性患者的资料。结果:疼痛管理非常成功37例(25.6%),成功55例(38.1%),不成功52例(35.3%)。单独使用线圈的治疗在疼痛管理方面明显比使用除线圈外的其他材料的治疗更成功(p = 0.036)。此外,术前单侧肾功能不全的患者比双侧肾功能不全的患者更能成功地控制疼痛(p = 0.041)。生殖/绝经后状态和胎次对治疗效果无统计学意义(p = 0.250和p = 0.573)。结论:腔内静脉栓塞术因其侵入性小、可重复性好,是治疗室性早搏的重要选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of the endovascular ovarian vein embolization technique in pelvic venous congestion syndrome.

Efficacy of the endovascular ovarian vein embolization technique in pelvic venous congestion syndrome.

Efficacy of the endovascular ovarian vein embolization technique in pelvic venous congestion syndrome.

Efficacy of the endovascular ovarian vein embolization technique in pelvic venous congestion syndrome.

Purpose: Pelvic pain, either related or unrelated to menstruation, is especially common in women of reproductive age. Thirty-nine per cent of all women suffer from chronic pelvic pain at some point in their lives, and pelvic venous congestion syndrome (PVCS) is the cause of this pain in 30% of cases. The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the success of endovascular venous embolization used in the treatment of PVCS, and to present the long-term treatment results.

Material and methods: The data of 144 female patients who underwent endovascular ovarian vein embolization for PVCS between January 2012 and July 2020 were retrospectively analysed.

Results: Pain management was determined to be very successful in 37 (25.6%) patients, successful in 55 (38.1%), and unsuccessful in 52 (35.3%). Treatments using a coil alone were significantly more successful in pain management than those involving the use of different materials in addition to the coil (p = 0.036). In addition, patients with unilateral insufficiency before the procedure were found to have more successful pain management than those with bilateral insufficiency (p = 0.041). Reproductive/postmenopausal state and parity did not have a statistically significant effect on treatment efficacy (p = 0.250 and p = 0.573, respectively).

Conclusions: Endovascular pelvic venous embolization is an important option in the treatment of PVCS due its less invasive and reproducible nature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信