Emilia Wnuk, Edyta Maj, Anna Jabłońska-Pawlak, Maria Jeczeń, Katarzyna Rowińska-Berman, Olgierd Rowiński
{"title":"Graves眼病患者突出眼的磁共振成像测量结果与眼科检查结果的比较验证。","authors":"Emilia Wnuk, Edyta Maj, Anna Jabłońska-Pawlak, Maria Jeczeń, Katarzyna Rowińska-Berman, Olgierd Rowiński","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.119939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although assessment of the orbital structures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well described in the literature, there is no consensus as to which measurement method is the most useful in exophthalmos assessment. The aim of the study was to correlate 2 MRI methods of exophthalmos measurement with exophthalmometry results and to determine a proper technique of exophthalmos measurement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients (108 orbits) with exophthalmos in the course of Graves' orbitopathy were enrolled in the study. Two measurements on axial T2W orbital MRI images were performed by 2 independent radiologists: the distance from the interzygomatic line to the anterior surface of the globe (AD) and the distance from the interzygomatic line to the posterior sclera (PD). Within 4 weeks, an exophthalmometry was performed by an ophthalmologist using a Hertel exophthalmometer. The inter-observer variation was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Values were presented as mean and standard deviation, and the differences in values were explored with Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean AD measured on MRI by the first observer was 20.6 ± 3 mm, and 20.6 ± 2.9 mm by the second observer. PD values were 2.9 ± 2.8 mm and 3.4 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. The mean exophthalmometry result was 21 ± 3.3 mm. The correlation was very high between observers for AD measurements (<i>r</i> = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and high for PD measurements (<i>r</i> = 0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.01). AD measurements on MRI and exophthalmometry results were strongly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AD measurement has better reproducibility and is directly correlated with Hertel exophthalmometry. This method could be sufficient in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/c4/PJR-87-47922.PMC9536203.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of exophthalmos magnetic resonance imaging measurements in patients with Graves' orbitopathy, compared to ophthalmometry results.\",\"authors\":\"Emilia Wnuk, Edyta Maj, Anna Jabłońska-Pawlak, Maria Jeczeń, Katarzyna Rowińska-Berman, Olgierd Rowiński\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.119939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although assessment of the orbital structures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well described in the literature, there is no consensus as to which measurement method is the most useful in exophthalmos assessment. The aim of the study was to correlate 2 MRI methods of exophthalmos measurement with exophthalmometry results and to determine a proper technique of exophthalmos measurement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients (108 orbits) with exophthalmos in the course of Graves' orbitopathy were enrolled in the study. Two measurements on axial T2W orbital MRI images were performed by 2 independent radiologists: the distance from the interzygomatic line to the anterior surface of the globe (AD) and the distance from the interzygomatic line to the posterior sclera (PD). Within 4 weeks, an exophthalmometry was performed by an ophthalmologist using a Hertel exophthalmometer. The inter-observer variation was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Values were presented as mean and standard deviation, and the differences in values were explored with Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean AD measured on MRI by the first observer was 20.6 ± 3 mm, and 20.6 ± 2.9 mm by the second observer. PD values were 2.9 ± 2.8 mm and 3.4 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. The mean exophthalmometry result was 21 ± 3.3 mm. The correlation was very high between observers for AD measurements (<i>r</i> = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and high for PD measurements (<i>r</i> = 0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.01). AD measurements on MRI and exophthalmometry results were strongly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AD measurement has better reproducibility and is directly correlated with Hertel exophthalmometry. This method could be sufficient in routine practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/c4/PJR-87-47922.PMC9536203.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然利用磁共振成像(MRI)评估眼眶结构在文献中有很好的描述,但对于哪种测量方法在突出眼评估中最有用并没有达成共识。本研究的目的是将两种MRI突眼测量方法与突眼测量结果相关联,并确定一种合适的突眼测量技术。材料与方法:选取54例(108个眼窝)Graves眼病病程中眼球突出的患者作为研究对象。由2名独立放射科医生对T2W轴向眼眶MRI图像进行两项测量:颧间线到眼球前表面的距离(AD)和颧间线到巩膜后表面的距离(PD)。在4周内,由眼科医生使用Hertel刺眼计进行刺眼测量。使用Pearson相关系数评估观察者间变异。数值以均值和标准差表示,并采用Student's t检验探讨数值的差异。结果:第一观察者在MRI上测得的AD平均值为20.6±3 mm,第二观察者测得的AD平均值为20.6±2.9 mm。PD值分别为2.9±2.8 mm和3.4±2.8 mm。平均突眼测量结果为21±3.3 mm。观察者之间AD测量值的相关性非常高(r = 0.98, p = 0.01), PD测量值的相关性很高(r = 0.95, p = 0.01)。MRI上AD测量值与眼球测量结果呈强相关(r = 0.9, p = 0.01)。结论:AD测量具有较好的重现性,与Hertel刺眼有直接相关性。这种方法在日常实践中是足够的。
Validation of exophthalmos magnetic resonance imaging measurements in patients with Graves' orbitopathy, compared to ophthalmometry results.
Purpose: Although assessment of the orbital structures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well described in the literature, there is no consensus as to which measurement method is the most useful in exophthalmos assessment. The aim of the study was to correlate 2 MRI methods of exophthalmos measurement with exophthalmometry results and to determine a proper technique of exophthalmos measurement.
Material and methods: Fifty-four patients (108 orbits) with exophthalmos in the course of Graves' orbitopathy were enrolled in the study. Two measurements on axial T2W orbital MRI images were performed by 2 independent radiologists: the distance from the interzygomatic line to the anterior surface of the globe (AD) and the distance from the interzygomatic line to the posterior sclera (PD). Within 4 weeks, an exophthalmometry was performed by an ophthalmologist using a Hertel exophthalmometer. The inter-observer variation was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Values were presented as mean and standard deviation, and the differences in values were explored with Student's t-test.
Results: The mean AD measured on MRI by the first observer was 20.6 ± 3 mm, and 20.6 ± 2.9 mm by the second observer. PD values were 2.9 ± 2.8 mm and 3.4 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. The mean exophthalmometry result was 21 ± 3.3 mm. The correlation was very high between observers for AD measurements (r = 0.98, p = 0.01) and high for PD measurements (r = 0.95, p = 0.01). AD measurements on MRI and exophthalmometry results were strongly correlated (r = 0.9, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: The AD measurement has better reproducibility and is directly correlated with Hertel exophthalmometry. This method could be sufficient in routine practice.