帕洛诺司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防中耳术后恶心呕吐的比较:一项随机对照研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-14 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_131_21
Kanhaiya Kumar, Rajnish Kumar, Mumtaz Hussain, Bibha Kumari, Arvind Kumar
{"title":"帕洛诺司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防中耳术后恶心呕吐的比较:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Kanhaiya Kumar,&nbsp;Rajnish Kumar,&nbsp;Mumtaz Hussain,&nbsp;Bibha Kumari,&nbsp;Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_131_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are one of the common distressing conditions after anesthesia. The PONV are related to several potential risk factors are patient related, anesthesia related, and surgery related. In surgery-related risk, middle ear surgery is associated with a high incidence of PONV.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficiency of palonosetron versus palonosetron with dexamethasone in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgeries.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The data were presented as descriptive statistics for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables and were subjected to Z-test/Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. The value of <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic parts in comparison to age, duration of surgery, and duration of anesthesia were similar in both the groups. Our study showed that the incidence of PONV during 0-6 h was 38% (<i>n</i> = 19) in Group A and 12% (<i>n</i> = 6) in Group B and the incidence during 6-12 h postoperatively was 14% (<i>n</i> = 7) in Group A and 8% (<i>n</i> = 4) in Group B. During 12-24 h, the incidence was 8% (<i>n</i> = 4) and 6% (<i>n</i> = 3) in Group A and B, respectively. Hence, the difference of total early PONV in Group A was 60% (<i>n</i> = 30) and in Group B, it was 26% (<i>n</i> = 13) which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The above result proves that palonosetron and dexamethasone group is superior in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Palonosetron Versus Palonosetron and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Middle Ear Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kanhaiya Kumar,&nbsp;Rajnish Kumar,&nbsp;Mumtaz Hussain,&nbsp;Bibha Kumari,&nbsp;Arvind Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_131_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are one of the common distressing conditions after anesthesia. The PONV are related to several potential risk factors are patient related, anesthesia related, and surgery related. In surgery-related risk, middle ear surgery is associated with a high incidence of PONV.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficiency of palonosetron versus palonosetron with dexamethasone in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgeries.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The data were presented as descriptive statistics for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables and were subjected to Z-test/Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. The value of <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic parts in comparison to age, duration of surgery, and duration of anesthesia were similar in both the groups. Our study showed that the incidence of PONV during 0-6 h was 38% (<i>n</i> = 19) in Group A and 12% (<i>n</i> = 6) in Group B and the incidence during 6-12 h postoperatively was 14% (<i>n</i> = 7) in Group A and 8% (<i>n</i> = 4) in Group B. During 12-24 h, the incidence was 8% (<i>n</i> = 4) and 6% (<i>n</i> = 3) in Group A and B, respectively. Hence, the difference of total early PONV in Group A was 60% (<i>n</i> = 30) and in Group B, it was 26% (<i>n</i> = 13) which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The above result proves that palonosetron and dexamethasone group is superior in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"17-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_131_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_131_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后恶心呕吐(PONV)是麻醉后常见的困扰症状之一。PONV与几个潜在的危险因素有关,包括患者相关、麻醉相关和手术相关。在手术相关风险中,中耳手术与PONV的高发相关。目的:本研究旨在比较帕洛诺司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防中耳手术中PONV的疗效。环境和设计:这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。统计分析:对连续变量采用描述性统计,对分类变量采用百分比统计,采用z检验/卡方检验/Fisher精确检验。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:两组患者的人口学部分与年龄、手术时间和麻醉时间比较相似。我们的研究显示,术后0 ~ 6 h, A组PONV发病率为38% (n = 19), B组为12% (n = 6);术后6 ~ 12 h, A组发病率为14% (n = 7), B组发病率为8% (n = 4)。术后12 ~ 24 h, A组和B组PONV发病率分别为8% (n = 4)和6% (n = 3)。因此,A组早期总PONV为60% (n = 30), B组为26% (n = 13),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.03)。结论:上述结果证明帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松组在中耳手术中预防PONV的效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Palonosetron Versus Palonosetron and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Middle Ear Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Comparison of Palonosetron Versus Palonosetron and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Middle Ear Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are one of the common distressing conditions after anesthesia. The PONV are related to several potential risk factors are patient related, anesthesia related, and surgery related. In surgery-related risk, middle ear surgery is associated with a high incidence of PONV.

Aims: This study aimed to compare the efficiency of palonosetron versus palonosetron with dexamethasone in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgeries.

Settings and design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Statistical analysis: The data were presented as descriptive statistics for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables and were subjected to Z-test/Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. The value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Demographic parts in comparison to age, duration of surgery, and duration of anesthesia were similar in both the groups. Our study showed that the incidence of PONV during 0-6 h was 38% (n = 19) in Group A and 12% (n = 6) in Group B and the incidence during 6-12 h postoperatively was 14% (n = 7) in Group A and 8% (n = 4) in Group B. During 12-24 h, the incidence was 8% (n = 4) and 6% (n = 3) in Group A and B, respectively. Hence, the difference of total early PONV in Group A was 60% (n = 30) and in Group B, it was 26% (n = 13) which was statistically significant (P < 0.03).

Conclusions: The above result proves that palonosetron and dexamethasone group is superior in the prevention of PONV in middle ear surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信