{"title":"考夫曼模型的可破坏性和公理化性","authors":"Corey Bacal Switzer","doi":"10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A Kaufmann model is an <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span>-like, recursively saturated, rather classless model of <span>\\({{\\mathsf {P}}}{{\\mathsf {A}}}\\)</span> (or <span>\\({{\\mathsf {Z}}}{{\\mathsf {F}}} \\)</span>). Such models were constructed by Kaufmann under the combinatorial principle <span>\\(\\diamondsuit _{\\omega _1}\\)</span> and Shelah showed they exist in <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> by an absoluteness argument. Kaufmann models are an important witness to the incompactness of <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span> similar to Aronszajn trees. In this paper we look at some set theoretic issues related to this motivated by the seemingly naïve question of whether such a model can be “killed” by forcing without collapsing <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span>. We show that the answer to this question is independent of <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> and closely related to similar questions about Aronszajn trees. As an application of these methods we also show that it is independent of <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> whether or not Kaufmann models can be axiomatized in the logic <span>\\(L_{\\omega _1, \\omega } (Q)\\)</span> where <i>Q</i> is the quantifier “there exists uncountably many”.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Destructibility and axiomatizability of Kaufmann models\",\"authors\":\"Corey Bacal Switzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A Kaufmann model is an <span>\\\\(\\\\omega _1\\\\)</span>-like, recursively saturated, rather classless model of <span>\\\\({{\\\\mathsf {P}}}{{\\\\mathsf {A}}}\\\\)</span> (or <span>\\\\({{\\\\mathsf {Z}}}{{\\\\mathsf {F}}} \\\\)</span>). Such models were constructed by Kaufmann under the combinatorial principle <span>\\\\(\\\\diamondsuit _{\\\\omega _1}\\\\)</span> and Shelah showed they exist in <span>\\\\(\\\\mathsf {ZFC}\\\\)</span> by an absoluteness argument. Kaufmann models are an important witness to the incompactness of <span>\\\\(\\\\omega _1\\\\)</span> similar to Aronszajn trees. In this paper we look at some set theoretic issues related to this motivated by the seemingly naïve question of whether such a model can be “killed” by forcing without collapsing <span>\\\\(\\\\omega _1\\\\)</span>. We show that the answer to this question is independent of <span>\\\\(\\\\mathsf {ZFC}\\\\)</span> and closely related to similar questions about Aronszajn trees. As an application of these methods we also show that it is independent of <span>\\\\(\\\\mathsf {ZFC}\\\\)</span> whether or not Kaufmann models can be axiomatized in the logic <span>\\\\(L_{\\\\omega _1, \\\\omega } (Q)\\\\)</span> where <i>Q</i> is the quantifier “there exists uncountably many”.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Destructibility and axiomatizability of Kaufmann models
A Kaufmann model is an \(\omega _1\)-like, recursively saturated, rather classless model of \({{\mathsf {P}}}{{\mathsf {A}}}\) (or \({{\mathsf {Z}}}{{\mathsf {F}}} \)). Such models were constructed by Kaufmann under the combinatorial principle \(\diamondsuit _{\omega _1}\) and Shelah showed they exist in \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) by an absoluteness argument. Kaufmann models are an important witness to the incompactness of \(\omega _1\) similar to Aronszajn trees. In this paper we look at some set theoretic issues related to this motivated by the seemingly naïve question of whether such a model can be “killed” by forcing without collapsing \(\omega _1\). We show that the answer to this question is independent of \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) and closely related to similar questions about Aronszajn trees. As an application of these methods we also show that it is independent of \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) whether or not Kaufmann models can be axiomatized in the logic \(L_{\omega _1, \omega } (Q)\) where Q is the quantifier “there exists uncountably many”.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.