尼泊尔奇特旺国家公园禁止采集自然资源的驱动因素。

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Environmental Conservation Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-07 DOI:10.1017/s0376892922000121
Scott T Yabiku, Abigail Sullivan, Abigail M York, Qunshan Zhao, Jennifer E Glick, Sharon J Hall, Dirgha J Ghimire, Li An
{"title":"尼泊尔奇特旺国家公园禁止采集自然资源的驱动因素。","authors":"Scott T Yabiku, Abigail Sullivan, Abigail M York, Qunshan Zhao, Jennifer E Glick, Sharon J Hall, Dirgha J Ghimire, Li An","doi":"10.1017/s0376892922000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protected areas (PAs) are critical for achieving conservation, economic and development goals, but the factors that lead households to engage in prohibited resource collection in PAs are not well understood. We examine collection behaviours in community forests and the protected Chitwan National Park in Chitwan, Nepal. Our approach incorporates household and ecological data, including structured interviews, spatially explicit data on collection behaviours measured with computer tablets and a systematic field survey of invasive species. We pair our data with a framework that considers factors related to a household's demand for resources, barriers to prohibited resource collection, barriers to legal resource collection and alternatives to resource collection. The analysis identifies key drivers of prohibited collection, including sociodemographic variables and perceptions of an invasive plant (<i>Mikania micrantha</i>). The social-ecological systems approach reveals that household perceptions of the presence of <i>M. micrantha</i> were more strongly associated with resource collection decisions than the actual ecologically measured presence of the plant. We explore the policy implications of our findings for PAs and propose that employing a social-ecological systems approach leads to conservation policy and scientific insights that are not possible to achieve with social or ecological approaches alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":50517,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Conservation","volume":"49 2","pages":"114-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Scott T Yabiku, Abigail Sullivan, Abigail M York, Qunshan Zhao, Jennifer E Glick, Sharon J Hall, Dirgha J Ghimire, Li An\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0376892922000121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protected areas (PAs) are critical for achieving conservation, economic and development goals, but the factors that lead households to engage in prohibited resource collection in PAs are not well understood. We examine collection behaviours in community forests and the protected Chitwan National Park in Chitwan, Nepal. Our approach incorporates household and ecological data, including structured interviews, spatially explicit data on collection behaviours measured with computer tablets and a systematic field survey of invasive species. We pair our data with a framework that considers factors related to a household's demand for resources, barriers to prohibited resource collection, barriers to legal resource collection and alternatives to resource collection. The analysis identifies key drivers of prohibited collection, including sociodemographic variables and perceptions of an invasive plant (<i>Mikania micrantha</i>). The social-ecological systems approach reveals that household perceptions of the presence of <i>M. micrantha</i> were more strongly associated with resource collection decisions than the actual ecologically measured presence of the plant. We explore the policy implications of our findings for PAs and propose that employing a social-ecological systems approach leads to conservation policy and scientific insights that are not possible to achieve with social or ecological approaches alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Conservation\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"114-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892922000121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892922000121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护区对于实现保护、经济和发展目标至关重要,但人们对导致家庭在保护区内进行违禁资源采集的因素了解不多。我们研究了尼泊尔奇特旺社区森林和奇特旺国家公园保护区内的采集行为。我们的方法结合了家庭和生态数据,包括结构化访谈、用电脑平板测量的采集行为空间明确数据以及入侵物种的系统性实地调查。我们将数据与一个框架配对,该框架考虑了与家庭对资源的需求、禁止资源采集的障碍、合法资源采集的障碍以及资源采集的替代方法有关的因素。分析确定了禁止采集的主要驱动因素,包括社会人口变量和对入侵植物(薇甘菊)的看法。社会生态系统方法揭示了家庭对薇甘菊存在的看法与资源采集决策的关系比实际生态测量的薇甘菊存在情况更为密切。我们探讨了我们的研究结果对保护区政策的影响,并提出采用社会-生态系统分析方法可以获得保护政策和科学见解,而这些是仅采用社会或生态方法无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.

Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.

Protected areas (PAs) are critical for achieving conservation, economic and development goals, but the factors that lead households to engage in prohibited resource collection in PAs are not well understood. We examine collection behaviours in community forests and the protected Chitwan National Park in Chitwan, Nepal. Our approach incorporates household and ecological data, including structured interviews, spatially explicit data on collection behaviours measured with computer tablets and a systematic field survey of invasive species. We pair our data with a framework that considers factors related to a household's demand for resources, barriers to prohibited resource collection, barriers to legal resource collection and alternatives to resource collection. The analysis identifies key drivers of prohibited collection, including sociodemographic variables and perceptions of an invasive plant (Mikania micrantha). The social-ecological systems approach reveals that household perceptions of the presence of M. micrantha were more strongly associated with resource collection decisions than the actual ecologically measured presence of the plant. We explore the policy implications of our findings for PAs and propose that employing a social-ecological systems approach leads to conservation policy and scientific insights that are not possible to achieve with social or ecological approaches alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Conservation
Environmental Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Conservation is one of the longest-standing, most highly-cited of the interdisciplinary environmental science journals. It includes research papers, reports, comments, subject reviews, and book reviews addressing environmental policy, practice, and natural and social science of environmental concern at the global level, informed by rigorous local level case studies. The journal"s scope is very broad, including issues in human institutions, ecosystem change, resource utilisation, terrestrial biomes, aquatic systems, and coastal and land use management. Environmental Conservation is essential reading for all environmentalists, managers, consultants, agency workers and scientists wishing to keep abreast of current developments in environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信