微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术时停止常规放置空肠造口管及其对体重指数的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Brian M. Till MD , Jenna Mandel , Ece Unal , Luke Juckett , Tyler Grenda MD , Olugbenga Okusanya MD , Francesco Palazzo MD , Karen Chojnacki MD , Nathaniel R. Evans MD
{"title":"微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术时停止常规放置空肠造口管及其对体重指数的影响。","authors":"Brian M. Till MD ,&nbsp;Jenna Mandel ,&nbsp;Ece Unal ,&nbsp;Luke Juckett ,&nbsp;Tyler Grenda MD ,&nbsp;Olugbenga Okusanya MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Palazzo MD ,&nbsp;Karen Chojnacki MD ,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Evans MD","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Jejunostomy tubes are frequently placed at time of </span>esophagectomy<span>. The purpose of this study is to evaluate cessation of routine j-tube placement on postoperative body mass index (BMI), return to the emergency room, and time until adjuvant therapy. We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database for consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy from 2014-2021 (after January 2019, routine j-tube placement was abandoned). Data was analyzed using Pearson′s Chi-squared tests and Student's </span></span><em>t</em> test with 2-sided significance level of <em>P &lt;</em> 0.05. In total,179 patients were included, 95 underwent j-tube placement and 84 did not. Cohorts had comparable baseline BMI's (no j-tube: 30.48 vs j-tube: 28.64, <em>P =</em><span> 0.06) and anastomotic leak rates (2.4% vs 4.2%, </span><em>P =</em><span> 0.5). Patients with no jejunostomy tubes were more likely to receive total parenteral nutrition (14.3% vs 5.3%, </span><em>P &lt;</em><span> 0.05), but were no more likely to require total parenteral nutrition at discharge and had comparable durations of TPN requirement (7 days vs 12 days, </span><em>P =</em> 0.53). There was no difference in mean BMI reduction at 2 weeks (2.54 vs 2.09, <em>P =</em> 0.49) and 3-6 months postoperatively (6.11 vs 4.45 <em>P =</em> 0.15). There was no difference in return to the emergency room (8.3% vs 8.4%, <em>P =</em> 0.98) or readmissions (13.1% vs 11.6%, <em>P =</em> 0.76). There was a no difference in mean time to adjuvant therapy (83.5 days vs 72.6 days, <em>P =</em> 0.67). At esophagectomy centers with low anastomotic leak rates, cessation of routine j-tube placement at time of minimally esophagectomy can be undertaken without increasing risk of readmission, time until initiation of adjuvant therapy, or significantly impacting postoperative BMI loss.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cessation of Routine Jejunostomy Tube Placement at Time of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and Impact on Body Mass Index\",\"authors\":\"Brian M. Till MD ,&nbsp;Jenna Mandel ,&nbsp;Ece Unal ,&nbsp;Luke Juckett ,&nbsp;Tyler Grenda MD ,&nbsp;Olugbenga Okusanya MD ,&nbsp;Francesco Palazzo MD ,&nbsp;Karen Chojnacki MD ,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Evans MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Jejunostomy tubes are frequently placed at time of </span>esophagectomy<span>. The purpose of this study is to evaluate cessation of routine j-tube placement on postoperative body mass index (BMI), return to the emergency room, and time until adjuvant therapy. We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database for consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy from 2014-2021 (after January 2019, routine j-tube placement was abandoned). Data was analyzed using Pearson′s Chi-squared tests and Student's </span></span><em>t</em> test with 2-sided significance level of <em>P &lt;</em> 0.05. In total,179 patients were included, 95 underwent j-tube placement and 84 did not. Cohorts had comparable baseline BMI's (no j-tube: 30.48 vs j-tube: 28.64, <em>P =</em><span> 0.06) and anastomotic leak rates (2.4% vs 4.2%, </span><em>P =</em><span> 0.5). Patients with no jejunostomy tubes were more likely to receive total parenteral nutrition (14.3% vs 5.3%, </span><em>P &lt;</em><span> 0.05), but were no more likely to require total parenteral nutrition at discharge and had comparable durations of TPN requirement (7 days vs 12 days, </span><em>P =</em> 0.53). There was no difference in mean BMI reduction at 2 weeks (2.54 vs 2.09, <em>P =</em> 0.49) and 3-6 months postoperatively (6.11 vs 4.45 <em>P =</em> 0.15). There was no difference in return to the emergency room (8.3% vs 8.4%, <em>P =</em> 0.98) or readmissions (13.1% vs 11.6%, <em>P =</em> 0.76). There was a no difference in mean time to adjuvant therapy (83.5 days vs 72.6 days, <em>P =</em> 0.67). At esophagectomy centers with low anastomotic leak rates, cessation of routine j-tube placement at time of minimally esophagectomy can be undertaken without increasing risk of readmission, time until initiation of adjuvant therapy, or significantly impacting postoperative BMI loss.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 112-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食管切除术时经常会放置空肠造口管。本研究旨在评估停止常规放置空肠造瘘管对术后体重指数(BMI)、返回急诊室和辅助治疗时间的影响。我们对 2014-2021 年间接受微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的连续患者的机构数据库进行了回顾性审查(2019 年 1 月后,放弃常规 j 型管置入)。数据分析采用皮尔逊卡方检验和学生 t 检验,双侧显著性水平为 P <0.05。共纳入 179 例患者,其中 95 例接受了 j 型管置管,84 例未接受。两组患者的基线体重指数(无 j 型管:30.48 vs j 型管:28.64,P = 0.06)和吻合口漏发生率(2.4% vs 4.2%,P = 0.5)相当。没有空肠造口管的患者更有可能接受全肠外营养(14.3% vs 5.3%,P < 0.05),但出院时需要全肠外营养的可能性并不大,而且需要全肠外营养的时间也相当(7 天 vs 12 天,P = 0.53)。术后2周(2.54 vs 2.09,P = 0.49)和术后3-6个月(6.11 vs 4.45,P = 0.15)的平均体重指数降幅没有差异。急诊室复诊率(8.3% vs 8.4%,P = 0.98)和再住院率(13.1% vs 11.6%,P = 0.76)没有差异。辅助治疗的平均时间没有差异(83.5 天 vs 72.6 天,P = 0.67)。在吻合口漏率较低的食管切除中心,可以在进行微创食管切除术时停止常规放置J管,而不会增加再入院风险、辅助治疗开始前的时间,也不会对术后BMI下降产生显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cessation of Routine Jejunostomy Tube Placement at Time of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and Impact on Body Mass Index

Jejunostomy tubes are frequently placed at time of esophagectomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate cessation of routine j-tube placement on postoperative body mass index (BMI), return to the emergency room, and time until adjuvant therapy. We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database for consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy from 2014-2021 (after January 2019, routine j-tube placement was abandoned). Data was analyzed using Pearson′s Chi-squared tests and Student's t test with 2-sided significance level of P < 0.05. In total,179 patients were included, 95 underwent j-tube placement and 84 did not. Cohorts had comparable baseline BMI's (no j-tube: 30.48 vs j-tube: 28.64, P = 0.06) and anastomotic leak rates (2.4% vs 4.2%, P = 0.5). Patients with no jejunostomy tubes were more likely to receive total parenteral nutrition (14.3% vs 5.3%, P < 0.05), but were no more likely to require total parenteral nutrition at discharge and had comparable durations of TPN requirement (7 days vs 12 days, P = 0.53). There was no difference in mean BMI reduction at 2 weeks (2.54 vs 2.09, P = 0.49) and 3-6 months postoperatively (6.11 vs 4.45 P = 0.15). There was no difference in return to the emergency room (8.3% vs 8.4%, P = 0.98) or readmissions (13.1% vs 11.6%, P = 0.76). There was a no difference in mean time to adjuvant therapy (83.5 days vs 72.6 days, P = 0.67). At esophagectomy centers with low anastomotic leak rates, cessation of routine j-tube placement at time of minimally esophagectomy can be undertaken without increasing risk of readmission, time until initiation of adjuvant therapy, or significantly impacting postoperative BMI loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信