与功能性运动障碍共存:三场战斗的故事。解释现象学分析。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2022.2130312
Sylwia Bazydlo, Fiona J R Eccles
{"title":"与功能性运动障碍共存:三场战斗的故事。解释现象学分析。","authors":"Sylwia Bazydlo, Fiona J R Eccles","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2022.2130312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional movement disorders (FMD) have poor prognosis and high physical and psychological co-morbidity. Their pathogenesis remains unclear, clinicians often find them difficult to treat, and lack of agreement between healthcare providers and patients is common. This study aimed to explore the experiences of living with FMD to improve understanding of its impact and patients' needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants across the UK were recruited online through a charity's social media platforms. Semi structured interviews were conducted via video calls and were audio recorded and verbatim transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three superordinate themes were generated from the data, representing the three battles fought by the participants: (1) intrapersonal: the tug of war with the secret agent within- the power struggle with symptoms; (2) interpersonal: navigating stigma and self-preservation; (3) systemic: pursuing hope and treatments against helplessness and passivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loss of control, feelings of powerlessness and oppression by symptoms is often mirrored in participants' experiences of seeking healthcare and navigating societal stigma. Active efforts to regain influence, improve quality of life and maintain hope can be jeopardised by others' dismissive attitudes and lack of knowledge. Antonovsky's model of salutogenesis is proposed as a useful framework for facilitating empowerment in FMD service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living with functional movement disorders: a tale of three battles. An interpretative phenomenological analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sylwia Bazydlo, Fiona J R Eccles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2022.2130312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional movement disorders (FMD) have poor prognosis and high physical and psychological co-morbidity. Their pathogenesis remains unclear, clinicians often find them difficult to treat, and lack of agreement between healthcare providers and patients is common. This study aimed to explore the experiences of living with FMD to improve understanding of its impact and patients' needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants across the UK were recruited online through a charity's social media platforms. Semi structured interviews were conducted via video calls and were audio recorded and verbatim transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three superordinate themes were generated from the data, representing the three battles fought by the participants: (1) intrapersonal: the tug of war with the secret agent within- the power struggle with symptoms; (2) interpersonal: navigating stigma and self-preservation; (3) systemic: pursuing hope and treatments against helplessness and passivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loss of control, feelings of powerlessness and oppression by symptoms is often mirrored in participants' experiences of seeking healthcare and navigating societal stigma. Active efforts to regain influence, improve quality of life and maintain hope can be jeopardised by others' dismissive attitudes and lack of knowledge. Antonovsky's model of salutogenesis is proposed as a useful framework for facilitating empowerment in FMD service provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2130312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2130312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:功能性运动障碍(FMD)的预后较差,身体和心理并发症较高。其发病机制尚不清楚,临床医生通常认为难以治疗,医护人员与患者之间缺乏共识也很常见。本研究旨在探讨 FMD 患者的生活经历,以加深对其影响和患者需求的了解:方法: 通过一家慈善机构的社交媒体平台在英国在线招募了 10 名参与者。半结构式访谈通过视频通话进行,并进行了录音,采用解释现象学分析法对逐字记录进行了分析:结果:从数据中产生了三个上位主题,代表了参与者进行的三场战斗:(1) 个人内部:与内心的秘密特工拔河--与症状的权力斗争;(2) 人际关系:在污名化和自我保护中游刃有余;(3) 系统性:在无助和被动中追求希望和治疗:结论:失去控制、无能为力和被症状压迫的感觉往往反映在参与者寻求医疗保健和应对社会污名的经历中。由于他人的轻蔑态度和缺乏相关知识,重新获得影响力、改善生活质量和保持希望的积极努力可能会受到损害。安东诺夫斯基的 "致敬模型 "被认为是在提供手足口病服务时促进赋权的有用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living with functional movement disorders: a tale of three battles. An interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Objectives: Functional movement disorders (FMD) have poor prognosis and high physical and psychological co-morbidity. Their pathogenesis remains unclear, clinicians often find them difficult to treat, and lack of agreement between healthcare providers and patients is common. This study aimed to explore the experiences of living with FMD to improve understanding of its impact and patients' needs.

Methods: Ten participants across the UK were recruited online through a charity's social media platforms. Semi structured interviews were conducted via video calls and were audio recorded and verbatim transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Results: Three superordinate themes were generated from the data, representing the three battles fought by the participants: (1) intrapersonal: the tug of war with the secret agent within- the power struggle with symptoms; (2) interpersonal: navigating stigma and self-preservation; (3) systemic: pursuing hope and treatments against helplessness and passivity.

Conclusions: Loss of control, feelings of powerlessness and oppression by symptoms is often mirrored in participants' experiences of seeking healthcare and navigating societal stigma. Active efforts to regain influence, improve quality of life and maintain hope can be jeopardised by others' dismissive attitudes and lack of knowledge. Antonovsky's model of salutogenesis is proposed as a useful framework for facilitating empowerment in FMD service provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信