南非约翰内斯堡Rahima Moosa妇幼医院的儿科疼痛评估和管理调查。

IF 1.2
L M N Mabaso, A Bhettay, R Bandini, D Demopoulos
{"title":"南非约翰内斯堡Rahima Moosa妇幼医院的儿科疼痛评估和管理调查。","authors":"L M N Mabaso,&nbsp;A Bhettay,&nbsp;R Bandini,&nbsp;D Demopoulos","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.v112i8.16271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Painful experiences are common in the paediatric inpatient population. Immaturity and cognitive impairment may preclude clear description of such experiences, and requests for analgesia when needed. Methods of pain assessment and guidelines for treatment in the paediatric population are well established, but are not widely used. Limited data suggest that the situation is similar in South Africa (SA).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the assessment and management of pain in SA medical paediatric inpatients. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children who receive analgesia where indicated. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of pain, at presentation and among admitted patients, whether pain evaluations were performed and pain treated, and the adequacy of such treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional survey of medical paediatric inpatients at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH) in Johannesburg, SA, was conducted. The tool used for data collection was specifically designed for the study, with sections for demographic data, patient or caregiver interview, and chart review. Pain assessments were done using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale and the Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale. The analysis consisted of descriptive statistics of epidemiological data and comparative statistics using grouped variables, with the level of significance set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 74 children, aged between 3 days and 4 years. Male patients accounted for 58% of the cohort. The prevalence of pain at admission was 73% (n=53). Eight percent (n=6) of the study sample had pain evaluation at admission, and only 1 child had been evaluated for pain within the preceding 24 hours. Of the 74 patients reviewed, 10% (n=7) received appropriate analgesia. Paracetamol was given to 31% of patients (n=23), either for pyrexia or for an undocumented indication. More than half of the study sample (59%; n=44) received no analgesia. The presence of pain, both by caregiver report (p=0.62) and by pain score (p=0.074), was not associated with the administration of analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain in the paediatric population at RMMCH was found to be common, but it was seldom assessed, and validated pain scores were rarely used. The result was inadequate pain management in all the four domains of assessment, intervention, reassessment and ongoing management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520778,"journal":{"name":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","volume":" ","pages":"539-541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A paediatric pain assessment and management survey at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"L M N Mabaso,&nbsp;A Bhettay,&nbsp;R Bandini,&nbsp;D Demopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAMJ.v112i8.16271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Painful experiences are common in the paediatric inpatient population. Immaturity and cognitive impairment may preclude clear description of such experiences, and requests for analgesia when needed. Methods of pain assessment and guidelines for treatment in the paediatric population are well established, but are not widely used. Limited data suggest that the situation is similar in South Africa (SA).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the assessment and management of pain in SA medical paediatric inpatients. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children who receive analgesia where indicated. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of pain, at presentation and among admitted patients, whether pain evaluations were performed and pain treated, and the adequacy of such treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional survey of medical paediatric inpatients at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH) in Johannesburg, SA, was conducted. The tool used for data collection was specifically designed for the study, with sections for demographic data, patient or caregiver interview, and chart review. Pain assessments were done using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale and the Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale. The analysis consisted of descriptive statistics of epidemiological data and comparative statistics using grouped variables, with the level of significance set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 74 children, aged between 3 days and 4 years. Male patients accounted for 58% of the cohort. The prevalence of pain at admission was 73% (n=53). Eight percent (n=6) of the study sample had pain evaluation at admission, and only 1 child had been evaluated for pain within the preceding 24 hours. Of the 74 patients reviewed, 10% (n=7) received appropriate analgesia. Paracetamol was given to 31% of patients (n=23), either for pyrexia or for an undocumented indication. More than half of the study sample (59%; n=44) received no analgesia. The presence of pain, both by caregiver report (p=0.62) and by pain score (p=0.074), was not associated with the administration of analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain in the paediatric population at RMMCH was found to be common, but it was seldom assessed, and validated pain scores were rarely used. The result was inadequate pain management in all the four domains of assessment, intervention, reassessment and ongoing management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"539-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.v112i8.16271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.v112i8.16271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痛苦经历在儿科住院患者中很常见。不成熟和认知障碍可能妨碍对这些经历的清晰描述,并在需要时要求止痛。在儿科人群中,疼痛评估方法和治疗指南已经建立,但尚未广泛使用。有限的数据表明,南非的情况与此类似。目的:综述SA内科儿科住院患者疼痛的评估和处理。主要目的是确定在指征处接受镇痛的儿童比例。次要目的是确定就诊时和住院患者中疼痛的患病率,是否进行疼痛评估和疼痛治疗,以及这种治疗的充分性。方法:对南非约翰内斯堡Rahima Moosa妇幼医院(RMMCH)儿科住院患者进行前瞻性横断面调查。用于数据收集的工具是专门为研究设计的,包括人口统计数据、患者或护理人员访谈和图表回顾。疼痛评估采用修订后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰量表和新生儿/婴儿疼痛量表进行。分析采用流行病学资料的描述性统计和分组变量的比较统计,显著性水平设为结果:样本包括74名儿童,年龄在3天至4岁之间。男性患者占队列的58%。入院时疼痛的发生率为73% (n=53)。8% (n=6)的研究样本在入院时进行了疼痛评估,只有1名儿童在入院前24小时内进行了疼痛评估。在回顾的74例患者中,10% (n=7)接受了适当的镇痛。31%的患者(n=23)给予扑热息痛,用于发热或无证适应症。超过一半的研究样本(59%;N =44)未给予镇痛。根据护理人员报告(p=0.62)和疼痛评分(p=0.074),疼痛的存在与镇痛的使用无关。结论:在RMMCH的儿科人群中发现疼痛是常见的,但很少进行评估,并且很少使用有效的疼痛评分。结果是在评估、干预、再评估和持续管理四个领域的疼痛管理都不充分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A paediatric pain assessment and management survey at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Background: Painful experiences are common in the paediatric inpatient population. Immaturity and cognitive impairment may preclude clear description of such experiences, and requests for analgesia when needed. Methods of pain assessment and guidelines for treatment in the paediatric population are well established, but are not widely used. Limited data suggest that the situation is similar in South Africa (SA).

Objectives: To review the assessment and management of pain in SA medical paediatric inpatients. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children who receive analgesia where indicated. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of pain, at presentation and among admitted patients, whether pain evaluations were performed and pain treated, and the adequacy of such treatment.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional survey of medical paediatric inpatients at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH) in Johannesburg, SA, was conducted. The tool used for data collection was specifically designed for the study, with sections for demographic data, patient or caregiver interview, and chart review. Pain assessments were done using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale and the Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale. The analysis consisted of descriptive statistics of epidemiological data and comparative statistics using grouped variables, with the level of significance set at p<0.05.

Results: The sample consisted of 74 children, aged between 3 days and 4 years. Male patients accounted for 58% of the cohort. The prevalence of pain at admission was 73% (n=53). Eight percent (n=6) of the study sample had pain evaluation at admission, and only 1 child had been evaluated for pain within the preceding 24 hours. Of the 74 patients reviewed, 10% (n=7) received appropriate analgesia. Paracetamol was given to 31% of patients (n=23), either for pyrexia or for an undocumented indication. More than half of the study sample (59%; n=44) received no analgesia. The presence of pain, both by caregiver report (p=0.62) and by pain score (p=0.074), was not associated with the administration of analgesia.

Conclusion: Pain in the paediatric population at RMMCH was found to be common, but it was seldom assessed, and validated pain scores were rarely used. The result was inadequate pain management in all the four domains of assessment, intervention, reassessment and ongoing management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信