在现实主义评估中开展焦点小组。

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1177/13563890221124637
Ana Manzano
{"title":"在现实主义评估中开展焦点小组。","authors":"Ana Manzano","doi":"10.1177/13563890221124637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Focus groups are valuable tools for evaluators to help stakeholders to clarify programme theories. In 1987, R.K. Merton, often attributed with the birth of focus groups, wrote about how these were 'being mercilessly misused'. In the 1940s, his team had conceived focus groups as tools for developing middle-range theory, but through their astonishing success focus groups have metamorphosed and are often an 'unchallenged' choice in many evaluation approaches, while their practice seems to provide a philosophically diverse picture. This article examines what knowledge focus group data generate, and how they support theory development. It starts with an overview of the history of focus groups, establishing a relationship between their emergence as a data collection method and the evaluation profession. Practical lessons for conducting groups in realist evaluation are suggested, while exploring how qualitative data can support programme and middle-range theory development using the example of realist evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"28 4","pages":"406-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Manzano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13563890221124637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Focus groups are valuable tools for evaluators to help stakeholders to clarify programme theories. In 1987, R.K. Merton, often attributed with the birth of focus groups, wrote about how these were 'being mercilessly misused'. In the 1940s, his team had conceived focus groups as tools for developing middle-range theory, but through their astonishing success focus groups have metamorphosed and are often an 'unchallenged' choice in many evaluation approaches, while their practice seems to provide a philosophically diverse picture. This article examines what knowledge focus group data generate, and how they support theory development. It starts with an overview of the history of focus groups, establishing a relationship between their emergence as a data collection method and the evaluation profession. Practical lessons for conducting groups in realist evaluation are suggested, while exploring how qualitative data can support programme and middle-range theory development using the example of realist evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"406-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890221124637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890221124637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦点小组是评价人员帮助利益相关者澄清方案理论的宝贵工具。1987年,常被认为是焦点小组诞生者的默顿(R.K. Merton)写道,焦点小组是如何被“无情地滥用”的。在20世纪40年代,他的团队将焦点小组设想为发展中间理论的工具,但通过他们惊人的成功,焦点小组已经发生了变化,并且在许多评估方法中经常是一个“无可争议的”选择,而他们的实践似乎提供了一个哲学上多样化的画面。本文考察了焦点小组数据产生了什么知识,以及它们如何支持理论发展。它首先概述了焦点小组的历史,建立了焦点小组作为一种数据收集方法和评估专业之间的关系。提出了开展现实主义评价小组的实际经验教训,同时探讨了如何利用现实主义评价的例子,利用定性数据支持方案和中期理论发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.

Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.

Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.

Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.

Focus groups are valuable tools for evaluators to help stakeholders to clarify programme theories. In 1987, R.K. Merton, often attributed with the birth of focus groups, wrote about how these were 'being mercilessly misused'. In the 1940s, his team had conceived focus groups as tools for developing middle-range theory, but through their astonishing success focus groups have metamorphosed and are often an 'unchallenged' choice in many evaluation approaches, while their practice seems to provide a philosophically diverse picture. This article examines what knowledge focus group data generate, and how they support theory development. It starts with an overview of the history of focus groups, establishing a relationship between their emergence as a data collection method and the evaluation profession. Practical lessons for conducting groups in realist evaluation are suggested, while exploring how qualitative data can support programme and middle-range theory development using the example of realist evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信