[费城染色体核型和异基因造血干细胞移植对急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的影响]。

Yang Wang, Xiao-Man Xu, Min Zhang, Hui Wang
{"title":"[费城染色体核型和异基因造血干细胞移植对急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的影响]。","authors":"Yang Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Man Xu,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Wang","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractObjective: To explore the effect of Philadelphia chromosome karyotype (Ph) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 429 patients with all from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of cytogenetic karyotype analysis, they were divided into Ph<sup>+</sup> group (n=64), Ph<sup>-</sup> monomeric karyotype (MK) group (n=53) and Ph<sup>-</sup> NMK group (n=312). According to the treatment plan, they were divided into allo-HSCT group (n=236) and non-allo-HSCT group (n=193). The effects of karyotype and allo-HSCT on the short-term and long-term outcomes of all patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 429 patients, 6 (1.40%) died during induction therapy, 60 (13.99%) had no response, 363 (84.62%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 287 (66.90%) achieved minimal residual disease negative (MRD-). There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy (CR%, CR1%, MRD-%) among Ph<sup>+</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group (P>0.05). The median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-8.2 months) for 60 unresponsive patients and 39.8 months (95% CI: 28.6-45.9 months) for 363 CR patients. There was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy [5-year cumulative recurrence rate (CIR%), disease-free survival rate (DFS%) and overall survival rate (OS%) among Ph<sup>-</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group (P>0.05). Among 429 patients, 55.01% (236/429) underwent allo-HSCT. The short-term efficacy (CR%, MRD-%) and long-term efficacy (CIR%, DFS%, OS%)] of patients with allo-HSCT after more than 2 consolidation cycles were better than those of patients with non-allo-HSCT (P<0.05). For the three subgroups of Ph<sup>+</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group, the short-term and long-term efficacy of allo-HSCT patients was better than that of non-allo-HSCT patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement was a risk factor for CIR, DFS and OS, with adjusted or of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.08-2.78, P=0.032), 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-2.34, P=0.038) and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-2.97, P=0.028), respectively. No transplantation was a risk fator for CIR, DFS, OS. The adjusted or were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.18-5.39, P<0.001), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.10-4.34, P<0.001) and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.09-4.11, P<0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Karyotype (Ph<sup>+/-</sup> and MK/non-MK) seems to have no effect on the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients; allo-HSCT can affect the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients and improve their prognosis; liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement and non-implementation of allo-HSCT treatment strategy are the risk factors for poor prognosis of all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519535,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi","volume":" ","pages":"1397-1406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of Philadelphia Chromosome Karyotype and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia].\",\"authors\":\"Yang Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Man Xu,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.05.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractObjective: To explore the effect of Philadelphia chromosome karyotype (Ph) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 429 patients with all from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of cytogenetic karyotype analysis, they were divided into Ph<sup>+</sup> group (n=64), Ph<sup>-</sup> monomeric karyotype (MK) group (n=53) and Ph<sup>-</sup> NMK group (n=312). According to the treatment plan, they were divided into allo-HSCT group (n=236) and non-allo-HSCT group (n=193). The effects of karyotype and allo-HSCT on the short-term and long-term outcomes of all patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 429 patients, 6 (1.40%) died during induction therapy, 60 (13.99%) had no response, 363 (84.62%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 287 (66.90%) achieved minimal residual disease negative (MRD-). There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy (CR%, CR1%, MRD-%) among Ph<sup>+</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group (P>0.05). The median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-8.2 months) for 60 unresponsive patients and 39.8 months (95% CI: 28.6-45.9 months) for 363 CR patients. There was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy [5-year cumulative recurrence rate (CIR%), disease-free survival rate (DFS%) and overall survival rate (OS%) among Ph<sup>-</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group (P>0.05). Among 429 patients, 55.01% (236/429) underwent allo-HSCT. The short-term efficacy (CR%, MRD-%) and long-term efficacy (CIR%, DFS%, OS%)] of patients with allo-HSCT after more than 2 consolidation cycles were better than those of patients with non-allo-HSCT (P<0.05). For the three subgroups of Ph<sup>+</sup> group, Ph<sup>-</sup> MK group and Ph<sup>-</sup> non-MK group, the short-term and long-term efficacy of allo-HSCT patients was better than that of non-allo-HSCT patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement was a risk factor for CIR, DFS and OS, with adjusted or of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.08-2.78, P=0.032), 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-2.34, P=0.038) and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-2.97, P=0.028), respectively. No transplantation was a risk fator for CIR, DFS, OS. The adjusted or were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.18-5.39, P<0.001), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.10-4.34, P<0.001) and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.09-4.11, P<0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Karyotype (Ph<sup>+/-</sup> and MK/non-MK) seems to have no effect on the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients; allo-HSCT can affect the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients and improve their prognosis; liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement and non-implementation of allo-HSCT treatment strategy are the risk factors for poor prognosis of all patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1397-1406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.05.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.05.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:探讨费城染色体核型(Ph)和异基因造血干细胞移植(alloo - hsct)对急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)治疗的影响。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2020年12月429例患者的资料。根据细胞遗传学核型分析结果,将其分为Ph+组(n=64)、Ph-单体核型组(n=53)和Ph- NMK组(n=312)。根据治疗方案将患者分为同种异体移植组(n=236)和非同种异体移植组(n=193)。分析核型和同种异体造血干细胞移植对所有患者短期和长期预后的影响。结果:429例患者中,诱导治疗期间死亡6例(1.40%),无应答60例(13.99%),完全缓解363例(84.62%),最小残留病阴性(MRD-) 287例(66.90%)。Ph+组、Ph- MK组和Ph-非MK组近期疗效(CR%、CR1%、MRD-%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。60例无反应患者的中位OS为6.9个月(95% CI: 4.6-8.2个月),363例CR患者的中位OS为39.8个月(95% CI: 28.6-45.9个月)。Ph-组、Ph- MK组和Ph-非MK组的远期疗效[5年累积复发率(CIR%)、无病生存率(DFS%)和总生存率(OS%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在429例患者中,55.01%(236/429)接受了同种异体造血干细胞移植。2个以上巩固周期后,同种异体造血干细胞移植患者的短期疗效(CR%、MRD-%)和长期疗效(CIR%、DFS%、OS%)均优于非同种异体造血干细胞移植患者(P+组、Ph- MK组和Ph-非MK组),同种异体造血干细胞移植患者的短期和长期疗效优于非同种异体造血干细胞移植患者。多因素logistic回归分析显示,肝/脾/淋巴结肿大是CIR、DFS和OS的危险因素,调整or分别为1.23 (95% CI: 1.08-2.78, P=0.032)、1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-2.34, P=0.038)和1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-2.97, P=0.028)。无移植是CIR、DFS、OS的危险因素。校正后的or值为2.34 (95% CI: 1.18-5.39)。结论:核型(Ph+/-和MK/非MK)似乎对所有患者的短期和长期疗效没有影响;同种异体造血干细胞移植可影响所有患者的短期和长期疗效,改善其预后;肝/脾/淋巴结肿大和未实施同种异体移植治疗策略是所有患者预后不良的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of Philadelphia Chromosome Karyotype and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia].

AbstractObjective: To explore the effect of Philadelphia chromosome karyotype (Ph) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods: The data of 429 patients with all from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of cytogenetic karyotype analysis, they were divided into Ph+ group (n=64), Ph- monomeric karyotype (MK) group (n=53) and Ph- NMK group (n=312). According to the treatment plan, they were divided into allo-HSCT group (n=236) and non-allo-HSCT group (n=193). The effects of karyotype and allo-HSCT on the short-term and long-term outcomes of all patients were analyzed.

Results: Among the 429 patients, 6 (1.40%) died during induction therapy, 60 (13.99%) had no response, 363 (84.62%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 287 (66.90%) achieved minimal residual disease negative (MRD-). There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy (CR%, CR1%, MRD-%) among Ph+ group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group (P>0.05). The median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-8.2 months) for 60 unresponsive patients and 39.8 months (95% CI: 28.6-45.9 months) for 363 CR patients. There was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy [5-year cumulative recurrence rate (CIR%), disease-free survival rate (DFS%) and overall survival rate (OS%) among Ph- group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group (P>0.05). Among 429 patients, 55.01% (236/429) underwent allo-HSCT. The short-term efficacy (CR%, MRD-%) and long-term efficacy (CIR%, DFS%, OS%)] of patients with allo-HSCT after more than 2 consolidation cycles were better than those of patients with non-allo-HSCT (P<0.05). For the three subgroups of Ph+ group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group, the short-term and long-term efficacy of allo-HSCT patients was better than that of non-allo-HSCT patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement was a risk factor for CIR, DFS and OS, with adjusted or of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.08-2.78, P=0.032), 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-2.34, P=0.038) and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-2.97, P=0.028), respectively. No transplantation was a risk fator for CIR, DFS, OS. The adjusted or were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.18-5.39, P<0.001), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.10-4.34, P<0.001) and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.09-4.11, P<0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: Karyotype (Ph+/- and MK/non-MK) seems to have no effect on the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients; allo-HSCT can affect the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients and improve their prognosis; liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement and non-implementation of allo-HSCT treatment strategy are the risk factors for poor prognosis of all patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信