YouTube视频对异维甲酸治疗寻常性痤疮的评价。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Byeong Chang Ko, Sik Haw
{"title":"YouTube视频对异维甲酸治疗寻常性痤疮的评价。","authors":"Byeong Chang Ko,&nbsp;Sik Haw","doi":"10.5021/ad.21.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>YouTube is one of the most popular video-sharing websites in Korea, but incorrect or biased information is not properly regulated. Acne is common in adolescents and young adults who are familiar with YouTube. Thus, misleading information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos could distort the perception of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the quality of information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The keywords searched on YouTube Korea on July 1, 2020 were: isotretinoin, Roaccutane, and Isotinone. The DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information, and eight items were used to evaluate scientific accuracy and comprehensiveness: mechanism, indications, dose regimen, contraindications, side effects, blood tests, drug interactions, and pregnancy-related issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of videos searched was 728. After excluding duplicate or inappropriate videos, 164 videos were analyzed. In the DISCERN tool, the mean overall quality score was 2.24 on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. The mean score in the 8-issue-criteria, a 3-point scale from 0 to 2, was 0.61. Particularly, indications, blood tests, and drug interactions were poorly addressed in YouTube videos. Medical personnel offer better video quality than non-medical personnel. However, no significant difference in quality existed between the videos of dermatologists and those of other medical personnel. The quality score was not correlated with the popularity of the video.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube videos covering isotretinoin showed poor overall quality. Content quality did not have a significant correlation with popularity, so incorrect information could be propagated on YouTube.</p>","PeriodicalId":8233,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dermatology","volume":"34 5","pages":"340-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/48/ad-34-340.PMC9561295.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of YouTube Videos about Isotretinoin as Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.\",\"authors\":\"Byeong Chang Ko,&nbsp;Sik Haw\",\"doi\":\"10.5021/ad.21.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>YouTube is one of the most popular video-sharing websites in Korea, but incorrect or biased information is not properly regulated. Acne is common in adolescents and young adults who are familiar with YouTube. Thus, misleading information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos could distort the perception of treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the quality of information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The keywords searched on YouTube Korea on July 1, 2020 were: isotretinoin, Roaccutane, and Isotinone. The DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information, and eight items were used to evaluate scientific accuracy and comprehensiveness: mechanism, indications, dose regimen, contraindications, side effects, blood tests, drug interactions, and pregnancy-related issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of videos searched was 728. After excluding duplicate or inappropriate videos, 164 videos were analyzed. In the DISCERN tool, the mean overall quality score was 2.24 on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. The mean score in the 8-issue-criteria, a 3-point scale from 0 to 2, was 0.61. Particularly, indications, blood tests, and drug interactions were poorly addressed in YouTube videos. Medical personnel offer better video quality than non-medical personnel. However, no significant difference in quality existed between the videos of dermatologists and those of other medical personnel. The quality score was not correlated with the popularity of the video.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube videos covering isotretinoin showed poor overall quality. Content quality did not have a significant correlation with popularity, so incorrect information could be propagated on YouTube.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"340-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/48/ad-34-340.PMC9561295.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.21.143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.21.143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:YouTube是韩国最受欢迎的视频分享网站之一,但不正确或有偏见的信息没有得到适当的监管。痤疮在熟悉YouTube的青少年和年轻人中很常见。因此,YouTube视频中关于异维甲酸的误导性信息可能会扭曲对治疗的看法。目的:评价YouTube视频中有关异维甲酸信息的质量。方法:2020年7月1日在韩国YouTube网站上搜索的关键词为:异维甲酸、罗维甲酸、异丁酮。使用DISCERN工具评估信息的可靠性和质量,并使用8个项目评估科学准确性和全面性:机制、适应症、给药方案、禁忌症、副作用、血液检查、药物相互作用和妊娠相关问题。结果:搜索到的视频数为728个。剔除重复或不合适的视频后,分析了164个视频。在DISCERN工具中,从1到5的5分制中,平均总体质量得分为2.24。在8个问题标准(从0到2的3分制)中,平均得分为0.61。特别是,适应症、血液检查和药物相互作用在YouTube视频中没有得到很好的解决。医务人员比非医务人员提供更好的视频质量。然而,皮肤科医生的视频和其他医务人员的视频在质量上没有显著差异。质量分数与视频的受欢迎程度无关。结论:YouTube上涉及异维甲酸的视频整体质量较差。内容质量与受欢迎程度没有显著的相关性,因此可能会在YouTube上传播不正确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of YouTube Videos about Isotretinoin as Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos about Isotretinoin as Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos about Isotretinoin as Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos about Isotretinoin as Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Background: YouTube is one of the most popular video-sharing websites in Korea, but incorrect or biased information is not properly regulated. Acne is common in adolescents and young adults who are familiar with YouTube. Thus, misleading information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos could distort the perception of treatment.

Objective: We evaluated the quality of information about isotretinoin in YouTube videos.

Methods: The keywords searched on YouTube Korea on July 1, 2020 were: isotretinoin, Roaccutane, and Isotinone. The DISCERN tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information, and eight items were used to evaluate scientific accuracy and comprehensiveness: mechanism, indications, dose regimen, contraindications, side effects, blood tests, drug interactions, and pregnancy-related issues.

Results: The number of videos searched was 728. After excluding duplicate or inappropriate videos, 164 videos were analyzed. In the DISCERN tool, the mean overall quality score was 2.24 on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. The mean score in the 8-issue-criteria, a 3-point scale from 0 to 2, was 0.61. Particularly, indications, blood tests, and drug interactions were poorly addressed in YouTube videos. Medical personnel offer better video quality than non-medical personnel. However, no significant difference in quality existed between the videos of dermatologists and those of other medical personnel. The quality score was not correlated with the popularity of the video.

Conclusion: YouTube videos covering isotretinoin showed poor overall quality. Content quality did not have a significant correlation with popularity, so incorrect information could be propagated on YouTube.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dermatology
Annals of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Dermatology (Ann Dermatol) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Korean Dermatological Association and the Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology. Since 1989, Ann Dermatol has contributed as a platform for communicating the latest research outcome and recent trend of dermatology in Korea and all over the world. Ann Dermatol seeks for ameliorated understanding of skin and skin-related disease for clinicians and researchers. Ann Dermatol deals with diverse skin-related topics from laboratory investigations to clinical outcomes and invites review articles, original articles, case reports, brief reports and items of correspondence. Ann Dermatol is interested in contributions from all countries in which good and advanced research is carried out. Ann Dermatol willingly recruits well-organized and significant manuscripts with proper scope throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信