在德国初级保健中促进高抗生素处方者的合理抗生素治疗——ElektRA四组随机对照试验的研究方案。

Christin Löffler, Theresa Buuck, Julia Iwen, Maike Schulz, Antonia Zapf, Peter Kropp, Anja Wollny, Linda Krause, Britta Müller, Ann-Katrin Ozga, Elisabeth Goldschmidt, Attila Altiner
{"title":"在德国初级保健中促进高抗生素处方者的合理抗生素治疗——ElektRA四组随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Christin Löffler,&nbsp;Theresa Buuck,&nbsp;Julia Iwen,&nbsp;Maike Schulz,&nbsp;Antonia Zapf,&nbsp;Peter Kropp,&nbsp;Anja Wollny,&nbsp;Linda Krause,&nbsp;Britta Müller,&nbsp;Ann-Katrin Ozga,&nbsp;Elisabeth Goldschmidt,&nbsp;Attila Altiner","doi":"10.1186/s13012-022-01241-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rational use of antibiotics is of great importance in health care. In primary care, acute respiratory infections are the most common cause of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Since existing studies aiming to optimize antibiotic use are usually based on the voluntary participation of physicians, general practitioners (GPs) with inappropriate prescribing behavior are underrepresented. For the first time in Germany, the ElektRA study will assess and compare the effects of three interventions on antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory and urinary tract infections among high prescribers in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>ElektRA is a 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial among German GPs in nine regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. On their behalf, the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi) analyses all outpatient claims and prescription data. Based on this database, high antibiotic prescribing GPs are identified and randomized into four groups: a control group (N=2000) and three intervention arms. We test social norm feedback on antibiotic prescribing (N=2000), social norm feedback plus online training on rational prescribing practice and communication strategies (N=2000), and social norm feedback plus online peer-moderated training on rational antibiotic prescribing, communication strategies, and sustainable behavior change (N=1250). The primary outcome is the overall rate of antibiotic prescriptions. Outcomes are measured before intervention (T0, October 2020-September 2022) and over a period of 15 months (T1, October 2022 to December 2023) after randomization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The aim of the study is to implement individualized, low-threshold interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing among high prescribers in primary care. If successful, a change in behavior among otherwise difficult-to-reach high prescribers will directly improve patient care. The increase in quality of care will ideally be achieved both in terms of the quantity of antibiotics used as well as the kind of substances prescribed. Also, if effective strategies for high prescribers are identified through this study, they can be applied not only to the antibiotics addressed in this study, but also to other areas of prescription management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95468513.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting rational antibiotic therapy among high antibiotic prescribers in German primary care-study protocol of the ElektRA 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christin Löffler,&nbsp;Theresa Buuck,&nbsp;Julia Iwen,&nbsp;Maike Schulz,&nbsp;Antonia Zapf,&nbsp;Peter Kropp,&nbsp;Anja Wollny,&nbsp;Linda Krause,&nbsp;Britta Müller,&nbsp;Ann-Katrin Ozga,&nbsp;Elisabeth Goldschmidt,&nbsp;Attila Altiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13012-022-01241-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rational use of antibiotics is of great importance in health care. In primary care, acute respiratory infections are the most common cause of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Since existing studies aiming to optimize antibiotic use are usually based on the voluntary participation of physicians, general practitioners (GPs) with inappropriate prescribing behavior are underrepresented. For the first time in Germany, the ElektRA study will assess and compare the effects of three interventions on antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory and urinary tract infections among high prescribers in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>ElektRA is a 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial among German GPs in nine regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. On their behalf, the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi) analyses all outpatient claims and prescription data. Based on this database, high antibiotic prescribing GPs are identified and randomized into four groups: a control group (N=2000) and three intervention arms. We test social norm feedback on antibiotic prescribing (N=2000), social norm feedback plus online training on rational prescribing practice and communication strategies (N=2000), and social norm feedback plus online peer-moderated training on rational antibiotic prescribing, communication strategies, and sustainable behavior change (N=1250). The primary outcome is the overall rate of antibiotic prescriptions. Outcomes are measured before intervention (T0, October 2020-September 2022) and over a period of 15 months (T1, October 2022 to December 2023) after randomization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The aim of the study is to implement individualized, low-threshold interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing among high prescribers in primary care. If successful, a change in behavior among otherwise difficult-to-reach high prescribers will directly improve patient care. The increase in quality of care will ideally be achieved both in terms of the quantity of antibiotics used as well as the kind of substances prescribed. Also, if effective strategies for high prescribers are identified through this study, they can be applied not only to the antibiotics addressed in this study, but also to other areas of prescription management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95468513.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation Science : IS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation Science : IS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01241-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01241-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:合理使用抗生素在卫生保健中具有重要意义。在初级保健中,急性呼吸道感染是抗生素处方不当的最常见原因。由于现有旨在优化抗生素使用的研究通常是基于医生的自愿参与,有不当处方行为的全科医生(gp)的代表性不足。ElektRA研究将首次在德国评估和比较三种干预措施对初级保健中高处方者呼吸道和尿路感染抗生素处方率的影响。方法:ElektRA是一项四组随机对照试验,在九个地区法定健康保险医师协会的德国全科医生中进行。德国流动医疗保健中心研究所(Zi)代表他们分析了所有门诊索赔和处方数据。基于该数据库,确定高抗生素处方全科医生并随机分为四组:对照组(N=2000)和三个干预组。我们测试了社会规范反馈对抗生素处方的影响(N=2000),社会规范反馈加理性处方实践和沟通策略的在线培训(N=2000),社会规范反馈加理性抗生素处方、沟通策略和可持续行为改变的在线同伴调节培训(N=1250)。主要结果是抗生素处方的总体比率。在干预前(T0, 2020年10月至2022年9月)和随机化后15个月(T1, 2022年10月至2023年12月)测量结果。讨论:本研究的目的是实施个体化、低阈值干预措施,以减少初级保健中高处方者的抗生素处方。如果成功的话,难以触及的高处方者的行为改变将直接改善病人的护理。理想情况下,在使用抗生素的数量和所开药物的种类两方面,都将实现护理质量的提高。此外,如果通过本研究确定了针对高处方者的有效策略,它们不仅可以应用于本研究中提到的抗生素,还可以应用于处方管理的其他领域。试验注册:当前对照试验ISRCTN95468513。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Promoting rational antibiotic therapy among high antibiotic prescribers in German primary care-study protocol of the ElektRA 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Promoting rational antibiotic therapy among high antibiotic prescribers in German primary care-study protocol of the ElektRA 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Promoting rational antibiotic therapy among high antibiotic prescribers in German primary care-study protocol of the ElektRA 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Background: The rational use of antibiotics is of great importance in health care. In primary care, acute respiratory infections are the most common cause of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Since existing studies aiming to optimize antibiotic use are usually based on the voluntary participation of physicians, general practitioners (GPs) with inappropriate prescribing behavior are underrepresented. For the first time in Germany, the ElektRA study will assess and compare the effects of three interventions on antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory and urinary tract infections among high prescribers in primary care.

Method: ElektRA is a 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial among German GPs in nine regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. On their behalf, the Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi) analyses all outpatient claims and prescription data. Based on this database, high antibiotic prescribing GPs are identified and randomized into four groups: a control group (N=2000) and three intervention arms. We test social norm feedback on antibiotic prescribing (N=2000), social norm feedback plus online training on rational prescribing practice and communication strategies (N=2000), and social norm feedback plus online peer-moderated training on rational antibiotic prescribing, communication strategies, and sustainable behavior change (N=1250). The primary outcome is the overall rate of antibiotic prescriptions. Outcomes are measured before intervention (T0, October 2020-September 2022) and over a period of 15 months (T1, October 2022 to December 2023) after randomization.

Discussion: The aim of the study is to implement individualized, low-threshold interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing among high prescribers in primary care. If successful, a change in behavior among otherwise difficult-to-reach high prescribers will directly improve patient care. The increase in quality of care will ideally be achieved both in terms of the quantity of antibiotics used as well as the kind of substances prescribed. Also, if effective strategies for high prescribers are identified through this study, they can be applied not only to the antibiotics addressed in this study, but also to other areas of prescription management.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95468513.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信