乳房切除术后胸肌脱细胞真皮基质胸阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建预防假体错位的临床回顾。

Eplasty Pub Date : 2022-09-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Milind D Kachare, Brooke E Barrow, Samuel Corey, Omar Elfanagely, Alexander J Rossi, Alyssa M Simpson, Swapnil D Kachare, Joshua Choo, Bradon J Wilhelmi
{"title":"乳房切除术后胸肌脱细胞真皮基质胸阔肌肌皮瓣乳房重建预防假体错位的临床回顾。","authors":"Milind D Kachare,&nbsp;Brooke E Barrow,&nbsp;Samuel Corey,&nbsp;Omar Elfanagely,&nbsp;Alexander J Rossi,&nbsp;Alyssa M Simpson,&nbsp;Swapnil D Kachare,&nbsp;Joshua Choo,&nbsp;Bradon J Wilhelmi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) pedicled flaps are a well-established method for breast reconstruction in women with inadequate soft tissue coverage following mastectomy for breast cancer. The robust nature of the latissimus blood supply can accommodate immediate implant placement to increase breast volume; however, a known risk factor with this technique is implant malposition. By utilizing an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in subpectoral implant-based LDM reconstruction, it is hypothesized that patients will experience a lower incidence of implant malposition. This 13-year retrospective review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of breast reconstruction using this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy with a LDM flap, subpectoral implant, and an ADM from 2007 to 2020 by a single surgeon at a single institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients (LDM flaps, N = 51) were identified. Mean participant age was 50.25 ± 9.67 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.85 ± 6.15 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Comorbidities included hypertension (40.0%), diabetes mellitus (17.5%), and current smoking (25.0%). Mean follow-up was 31.52 ± 29.51 months. The most common complication was seroma formation (9.8%). No patients experienced implant malposition or flap necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a LDM flap and an ADM in implant-based breast reconstruction are each well described in the literature. This 13-year series supports the efficacy of these techniques utilized in combination to provide an aesthetic result while mitigating implant malposition during breast reconstruction of oncologic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":" ","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490880/pdf/eplasty-22-e39.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of Implant Malposition in Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Matrix With Pectoralis Muscle Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review.\",\"authors\":\"Milind D Kachare,&nbsp;Brooke E Barrow,&nbsp;Samuel Corey,&nbsp;Omar Elfanagely,&nbsp;Alexander J Rossi,&nbsp;Alyssa M Simpson,&nbsp;Swapnil D Kachare,&nbsp;Joshua Choo,&nbsp;Bradon J Wilhelmi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) pedicled flaps are a well-established method for breast reconstruction in women with inadequate soft tissue coverage following mastectomy for breast cancer. The robust nature of the latissimus blood supply can accommodate immediate implant placement to increase breast volume; however, a known risk factor with this technique is implant malposition. By utilizing an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in subpectoral implant-based LDM reconstruction, it is hypothesized that patients will experience a lower incidence of implant malposition. This 13-year retrospective review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of breast reconstruction using this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy with a LDM flap, subpectoral implant, and an ADM from 2007 to 2020 by a single surgeon at a single institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients (LDM flaps, N = 51) were identified. Mean participant age was 50.25 ± 9.67 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.85 ± 6.15 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Comorbidities included hypertension (40.0%), diabetes mellitus (17.5%), and current smoking (25.0%). Mean follow-up was 31.52 ± 29.51 months. The most common complication was seroma formation (9.8%). No patients experienced implant malposition or flap necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a LDM flap and an ADM in implant-based breast reconstruction are each well described in the literature. This 13-year series supports the efficacy of these techniques utilized in combination to provide an aesthetic result while mitigating implant malposition during breast reconstruction of oncologic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490880/pdf/eplasty-22-e39.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:背阔肌肌皮瓣是乳腺癌切除后软组织覆盖不足的女性乳房重建的一种行之有效的方法。阔肌血液供应的健壮性可以适应立即植入植入物以增加乳房体积;然而,使用这种技术的一个已知的危险因素是种植体错位。通过使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在胸下植入物为基础的LDM重建中,假设患者将经历较低的植入物错位发生率。这13年的回顾性研究旨在评估使用该技术进行乳房重建的有效性。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2020年由同一医院的同一位外科医生在乳房切除术后进行LDM皮瓣、胸下植入物和ADM重建的所有患者。收集和分析人口统计学和临床资料。结果:共发现LDM皮瓣40例(51例)。平均年龄为50.25±9.67岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为30.85±6.15 kg/m2。合并症包括高血压(40.0%)、糖尿病(17.5%)和目前吸烟(25.0%)。平均随访31.52±29.51个月。最常见的并发症是血肿形成(9.8%)。无种植体错位或皮瓣坏死。结论:LDM瓣和ADM瓣在假体乳房重建中的应用在文献中都有很好的描述。这13年的研究结果支持了这些技术结合使用的有效性,在肿瘤患者乳房重建过程中提供了美观的结果,同时减少了植入物的错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of Implant Malposition in Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Matrix With Pectoralis Muscle Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review.

Background: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) pedicled flaps are a well-established method for breast reconstruction in women with inadequate soft tissue coverage following mastectomy for breast cancer. The robust nature of the latissimus blood supply can accommodate immediate implant placement to increase breast volume; however, a known risk factor with this technique is implant malposition. By utilizing an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in subpectoral implant-based LDM reconstruction, it is hypothesized that patients will experience a lower incidence of implant malposition. This 13-year retrospective review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of breast reconstruction using this technique.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy with a LDM flap, subpectoral implant, and an ADM from 2007 to 2020 by a single surgeon at a single institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 40 patients (LDM flaps, N = 51) were identified. Mean participant age was 50.25 ± 9.67 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.85 ± 6.15 kg/m2. Comorbidities included hypertension (40.0%), diabetes mellitus (17.5%), and current smoking (25.0%). Mean follow-up was 31.52 ± 29.51 months. The most common complication was seroma formation (9.8%). No patients experienced implant malposition or flap necrosis.

Conclusions: The use of a LDM flap and an ADM in implant-based breast reconstruction are each well described in the literature. This 13-year series supports the efficacy of these techniques utilized in combination to provide an aesthetic result while mitigating implant malposition during breast reconstruction of oncologic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信