基于深度学习的骨骼破坏自动评估系统,使用来自其他关节的上下文信息。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kazuki Miyama, Ryoma Bise, Satoshi Ikemura, Kazuhiro Kai, Masaya Kanahori, Shinkichi Arisumi, Taisuke Uchida, Yasuharu Nakashima, Seiichi Uchida
{"title":"基于深度学习的骨骼破坏自动评估系统,使用来自其他关节的上下文信息。","authors":"Kazuki Miyama, Ryoma Bise, Satoshi Ikemura, Kazuhiro Kai, Masaya Kanahori, Shinkichi Arisumi, Taisuke Uchida, Yasuharu Nakashima, Seiichi Uchida","doi":"10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X-ray images are commonly used to assess the bone destruction of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system fully utilizing deep neural networks (DNN). This system detects all target joints of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) from a hand X-ray image. It then classifies every target joint as intact (SHS = 0) or non-intact (SHS ≥ 1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 226 hand X-ray images of 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients. As for detection, we used a DNN model called DeepLabCut. As for classification, we built four classification models that classify the detected joint as intact or non-intact. The first model classifies each joint independently, whereas the second model does it while comparing the same contralateral joint. The third model compares the same joint group (e.g., the proximal interphalangeal joints) of one hand and the fourth model compares the same joint group of both hands. We evaluated DeepLabCut's detection performance and classification models' performances. The classification models' performances were compared to three orthopedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detection rates for all the target joints were 98.0% and 97.3% for erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). Among the four classification models, the model that compares the same contralateral joint showed the best F-measure (0.70, 0.81) and area under the curve of the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) (0.73, 0.85) regarding erosion and JSN. As for erosion, the F-measure and PR-AUC of this model were better than the best of the orthopedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed system was useful. All the target joints were detected with high accuracy. The classification model that compared the same contralateral joint showed better performance than the orthopedic surgeons regarding erosion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51225,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"227"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Miyama, Ryoma Bise, Satoshi Ikemura, Kazuhiro Kai, Masaya Kanahori, Shinkichi Arisumi, Taisuke Uchida, Yasuharu Nakashima, Seiichi Uchida\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X-ray images are commonly used to assess the bone destruction of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system fully utilizing deep neural networks (DNN). This system detects all target joints of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) from a hand X-ray image. It then classifies every target joint as intact (SHS = 0) or non-intact (SHS ≥ 1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 226 hand X-ray images of 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients. As for detection, we used a DNN model called DeepLabCut. As for classification, we built four classification models that classify the detected joint as intact or non-intact. The first model classifies each joint independently, whereas the second model does it while comparing the same contralateral joint. The third model compares the same joint group (e.g., the proximal interphalangeal joints) of one hand and the fourth model compares the same joint group of both hands. We evaluated DeepLabCut's detection performance and classification models' performances. The classification models' performances were compared to three orthopedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detection rates for all the target joints were 98.0% and 97.3% for erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). Among the four classification models, the model that compares the same contralateral joint showed the best F-measure (0.70, 0.81) and area under the curve of the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) (0.73, 0.85) regarding erosion and JSN. As for erosion, the F-measure and PR-AUC of this model were better than the best of the orthopedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed system was useful. All the target joints were detected with high accuracy. The classification model that compared the same contralateral joint showed better performance than the orthopedic surgeons regarding erosion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:X 射线图像通常用于评估类风湿性关节炎的骨质破坏情况。本研究旨在提出一种完全利用深度神经网络(DNN)的自动骨质破坏评估系统。该系统可从手部 X 射线图像中检测出改良夏普/范德海德评分(SHS)的所有目标关节。然后,它将每个目标关节分类为完好(SHS = 0)或非完好(SHS ≥ 1):我们使用了 40 名类风湿性关节炎患者的 226 张手部 X 光图像。在检测方面,我们使用了名为 DeepLabCut 的 DNN 模型。在分类方面,我们建立了四个分类模型,将检测到的关节分为完好或不完好。第一个模型对每个关节进行独立分类,第二个模型则在对同一对侧关节进行比较的同时进行分类。第三个模型比较一只手的同一关节组(如近端指间关节),第四个模型比较两只手的同一关节组。我们评估了 DeepLabCut 的检测性能和分类模型的性能。我们将分类模型的性能与三位骨科医生进行了比较:所有目标关节的检测率为 98.0%,侵蚀和关节间隙狭窄(JSN)的检测率为 97.3%。在四种分类模型中,对同一对侧关节进行比较的模型在侵蚀和关节间隙狭窄方面显示出最佳的F-measure(0.70,0.81)和精确度-召回曲线下面积(PR-AUC)(0.73,0.85)。在侵蚀方面,该模型的 F 测量值和 PR-AUC 均优于骨科医生的最佳值:结论:提议的系统非常有用。所有目标关节的检测准确率都很高。比较同一对侧关节的分类模型在侵蚀方面的表现优于骨科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.

Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.

Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.

Deep learning-based automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system using contextual information from other joints.

Background: X-ray images are commonly used to assess the bone destruction of rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic-bone-destruction-evaluation system fully utilizing deep neural networks (DNN). This system detects all target joints of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) from a hand X-ray image. It then classifies every target joint as intact (SHS = 0) or non-intact (SHS ≥ 1).

Methods: We used 226 hand X-ray images of 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients. As for detection, we used a DNN model called DeepLabCut. As for classification, we built four classification models that classify the detected joint as intact or non-intact. The first model classifies each joint independently, whereas the second model does it while comparing the same contralateral joint. The third model compares the same joint group (e.g., the proximal interphalangeal joints) of one hand and the fourth model compares the same joint group of both hands. We evaluated DeepLabCut's detection performance and classification models' performances. The classification models' performances were compared to three orthopedic surgeons.

Results: Detection rates for all the target joints were 98.0% and 97.3% for erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). Among the four classification models, the model that compares the same contralateral joint showed the best F-measure (0.70, 0.81) and area under the curve of the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) (0.73, 0.85) regarding erosion and JSN. As for erosion, the F-measure and PR-AUC of this model were better than the best of the orthopedic surgeons.

Conclusions: The proposed system was useful. All the target joints were detected with high accuracy. The classification model that compared the same contralateral joint showed better performance than the orthopedic surgeons regarding erosion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信