卒中后患者经皮内镜胃造口管置入的时机不影响死亡率、并发症或预后。

Kavya M Reddy, Preston Lee, Parul J Gor, Antonio Cheesman, Noor Al-Hammadi, David John Westrich, Jason Taylor
{"title":"卒中后患者经皮内镜胃造口管置入的时机不影响死亡率、并发症或预后。","authors":"Kavya M Reddy,&nbsp;Preston Lee,&nbsp;Parul J Gor,&nbsp;Antonio Cheesman,&nbsp;Noor Al-Hammadi,&nbsp;David John Westrich,&nbsp;Jason Taylor","doi":"10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i5.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake. The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk. There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement, and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety of early (≤ 7 d post stroke) <i>vs</i> late (> 7 d post stroke) PEG tube placement and evaluate whether pre-procedural risk factors could predict mortality or complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis, MO between January 2011 and December 2017. Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports. Mortality, peri-procedural complication rates, and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups. Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition, presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent, and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke, 92 in the late group and 62 in the early group. There were 32 observed deaths, with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure. There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant. Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement (12.9 <i>vs</i> 22.34 d, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Protein calorie malnutrition, presence of SIRS criteria and/or documented infection prior to procedure or having a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent did not significantly predict mortality or complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay. Given similar safety outcomes in both groups, early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23755,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/db/WJGPT-13-77.PMC9453443.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kavya M Reddy,&nbsp;Preston Lee,&nbsp;Parul J Gor,&nbsp;Antonio Cheesman,&nbsp;Noor Al-Hammadi,&nbsp;David John Westrich,&nbsp;Jason Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i5.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake. The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk. There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement, and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety of early (≤ 7 d post stroke) <i>vs</i> late (> 7 d post stroke) PEG tube placement and evaluate whether pre-procedural risk factors could predict mortality or complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis, MO between January 2011 and December 2017. Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports. Mortality, peri-procedural complication rates, and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups. Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition, presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent, and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke, 92 in the late group and 62 in the early group. There were 32 observed deaths, with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure. There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant. Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement (12.9 <i>vs</i> 22.34 d, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Protein calorie malnutrition, presence of SIRS criteria and/or documented infection prior to procedure or having a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent did not significantly predict mortality or complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay. Given similar safety outcomes in both groups, early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"77-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/db/WJGPT-13-77.PMC9453443.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i5.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i5.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)管常用于卒中后吞咽困难,以保持足够的热量摄入。2011年ASGE指南建议将PEG管放置延迟两周,因为一半的吞咽困难患者在两周内改善。很少有研究比较基于PEG管置入时间的结果,并且越来越多的人需要尽早置入PEG管,以满足及时出院到康复中心和熟练护理机构的要求。目的:评价早期(卒中后≤7 d)与晚期(卒中后> 7 d)置管的安全性,并评价术前危险因素是否能预测死亡率或并发症。方法:我们对2011年1月至2017年12月在密苏里州圣路易斯的两家医院接受PEG管置入治疗中风后吞咽困难的患者进行了回顾性研究。通过内镜检查报告的关键词搜索来识别患者。比较两组患者的死亡率、术中并发症发生率和术后并发症发生率。发病率和死亡率的预测因子,如蛋白质-卡路里营养不良、存在独立心血管风险当量、存在全身性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准或记录感染,通过多变量logistic回归进行评估。结果:154例患者因卒中后吞咽困难放置了PEG管,其中晚期组92例,早期组62例。观察到32例死亡,其中8例发生在手术后30天内。延迟PEG放置术中和术后并发症的增加没有统计学意义。早期置置PEG管的患者住院时间明显缩短(12.9天vs 22.34天,P < 0.001)。蛋白质热量营养不良、存在SIRS标准和/或手术前有记录的感染或具有心血管疾病同等风险并不能显著预测死亡率或并发症。结论:卒中后早期置管不会导致更高的死亡率或并发症,并显著缩短住院时间。鉴于两组的安全性结果相似,应考虑在适当的患者中早期放置PEG管,以潜在地减少住院时间和产生的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake. The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks, as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk. There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement, and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.

Aim: To assess the safety of early (≤ 7 d post stroke) vs late (> 7 d post stroke) PEG tube placement and evaluate whether pre-procedural risk factors could predict mortality or complications.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis, MO between January 2011 and December 2017. Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports. Mortality, peri-procedural complication rates, and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups. Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition, presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent, and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: 154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke, 92 in the late group and 62 in the early group. There were 32 observed deaths, with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure. There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant. Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement (12.9 vs 22.34 d, P < 0.001). Protein calorie malnutrition, presence of SIRS criteria and/or documented infection prior to procedure or having a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent did not significantly predict mortality or complications.

Conclusion: Early PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay. Given similar safety outcomes in both groups, early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信