[STOP-BANG问卷作为麻醉期间气道管理困难的预测因素]。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dagoberto Ojeda, Valeria Monsalve, Patricia Cisternas, Álvaro Jorquera, Katalina Mora
{"title":"[STOP-BANG问卷作为麻醉期间气道管理困难的预测因素]。","authors":"Dagoberto Ojeda,&nbsp;Valeria Monsalve,&nbsp;Patricia Cisternas,&nbsp;Álvaro Jorquera,&nbsp;Katalina Mora","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022000400450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent. The STOP-BANG questionnaire is a simple and useful tool to screen for OSA.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Since OSA is strongly associated with airway management troubles, we sought to determine whether the STOP-BANG can predict difficult airway management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted including adult patients scheduled for major outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. The STOP-BANG questionnaire was preoperatively applied by a ward nurse. The Han scale mask ventilation difficulty scale, Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view scale were also applied and the need for video laryngoscopy was recorded. The number of attempts for successful insertion of a laryngeal mask airway were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 993 patients, of whom 53% required tracheal intubation and 47% a laryngeal mask. Most patients had a low OSA risk, (STOP-BANG < 3). STOP-BANG score was associated with difficult airway management (p < 0.05), except for the laryngeal mask airway insertion. The effect size was especially high for difficult mask ventilation with an Odds Ratio of 1.7 [ 95% confidence intervals (CI)1.2 - 2.4] and for video laryngoscopy, with an Odds Ratio of 1.6 [95% CI: 1.6 - 2.1]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was above 0.7, (acceptable level), only for predicting difficult mask ventilation. The cut-off for having a difficult mask ventilation was a STOP-BANG > 2. The positive and negative likelihood ratios, (2.0 and 0.2) imply poor predictive capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STOP-BANG questionnaire was only able to predict difficult mask ventilation. Since its discriminative value was low, it cannot be recommended it as a single predictor.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"150 4","pages":"450-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[STOP-BANG questionnaire as predictor of a difficult airway management during anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"Dagoberto Ojeda,&nbsp;Valeria Monsalve,&nbsp;Patricia Cisternas,&nbsp;Álvaro Jorquera,&nbsp;Katalina Mora\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0034-98872022000400450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent. The STOP-BANG questionnaire is a simple and useful tool to screen for OSA.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Since OSA is strongly associated with airway management troubles, we sought to determine whether the STOP-BANG can predict difficult airway management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted including adult patients scheduled for major outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. The STOP-BANG questionnaire was preoperatively applied by a ward nurse. The Han scale mask ventilation difficulty scale, Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view scale were also applied and the need for video laryngoscopy was recorded. The number of attempts for successful insertion of a laryngeal mask airway were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 993 patients, of whom 53% required tracheal intubation and 47% a laryngeal mask. Most patients had a low OSA risk, (STOP-BANG < 3). STOP-BANG score was associated with difficult airway management (p < 0.05), except for the laryngeal mask airway insertion. The effect size was especially high for difficult mask ventilation with an Odds Ratio of 1.7 [ 95% confidence intervals (CI)1.2 - 2.4] and for video laryngoscopy, with an Odds Ratio of 1.6 [95% CI: 1.6 - 2.1]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was above 0.7, (acceptable level), only for predicting difficult mask ventilation. The cut-off for having a difficult mask ventilation was a STOP-BANG > 2. The positive and negative likelihood ratios, (2.0 and 0.2) imply poor predictive capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STOP-BANG questionnaire was only able to predict difficult mask ventilation. Since its discriminative value was low, it cannot be recommended it as a single predictor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"150 4\",\"pages\":\"450-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022000400450\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022000400450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)非常普遍。STOP-BANG问卷是一种简单而有用的筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的工具。目的:由于OSA与气道管理困难密切相关,我们试图确定STOP-BANG是否可以预测气道管理困难。材料和方法:一项观察性横断面研究,包括在全身麻醉下进行门诊大手术的成年患者。术前由病房护士使用STOP-BANG问卷。应用Han量表面罩通气难度量表、Cormack-Lehane喉视镜量表,记录视频喉镜检查需求。确定了成功插入喉罩气道的尝试次数。结果:我们研究了993例患者,其中53%需要气管插管,47%需要喉罩。大多数患者的OSA风险较低(STOP-BANG < 3)。除喉罩插入气道外,STOP-BANG评分与气道管理困难相关(p < 0.05)。困难面罩通气的效应值特别高,优势比为1.7[95%可信区间(CI)1.2 - 2.4],视频喉镜的优势比为1.6 [95% CI: 1.6 - 2.1]。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积大于0.7(可接受水平),仅用于预测面罩通气困难。口罩通气困难的临界值为STOP-BANG > 2。正似然比和负似然比(2.0和0.2)表明预测能力较差。结论:STOP-BANG问卷仅能预测口罩通气困难。由于其判别值较低,不能作为单一预测因子推荐使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[STOP-BANG questionnaire as predictor of a difficult airway management during anesthesia].

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent. The STOP-BANG questionnaire is a simple and useful tool to screen for OSA.

Aim: Since OSA is strongly associated with airway management troubles, we sought to determine whether the STOP-BANG can predict difficult airway management.

Material and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted including adult patients scheduled for major outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. The STOP-BANG questionnaire was preoperatively applied by a ward nurse. The Han scale mask ventilation difficulty scale, Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view scale were also applied and the need for video laryngoscopy was recorded. The number of attempts for successful insertion of a laryngeal mask airway were determined.

Results: We studied 993 patients, of whom 53% required tracheal intubation and 47% a laryngeal mask. Most patients had a low OSA risk, (STOP-BANG < 3). STOP-BANG score was associated with difficult airway management (p < 0.05), except for the laryngeal mask airway insertion. The effect size was especially high for difficult mask ventilation with an Odds Ratio of 1.7 [ 95% confidence intervals (CI)1.2 - 2.4] and for video laryngoscopy, with an Odds Ratio of 1.6 [95% CI: 1.6 - 2.1]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was above 0.7, (acceptable level), only for predicting difficult mask ventilation. The cut-off for having a difficult mask ventilation was a STOP-BANG > 2. The positive and negative likelihood ratios, (2.0 and 0.2) imply poor predictive capability.

Conclusions: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was only able to predict difficult mask ventilation. Since its discriminative value was low, it cannot be recommended it as a single predictor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信