稳定和均衡机制的数量特征。

The American Naturalist Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1086/720665
Robert West, Nadav M Shnerb
{"title":"稳定和均衡机制的数量特征。","authors":"Robert West,&nbsp;Nadav M Shnerb","doi":"10.1086/720665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAn understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate coexistence in ecological communities poses a major challenge to theoretical ecology. A popular paradigmatic scheme distinguishes between two qualitatively different processes that help species to coexist: stabilizing mechanisms increase niche differentiation, making the intraspecific competition stronger than the interspecific one, while equalizing mechanisms diminish fitness differences, making the competition less decisive. Here, we provide an analytic and numeric examination of the quantitative features associated with this scheme for a simple, two-species competition model. We show that the main metrics of persistence change only slightly along the stabilizing-equalizing continuum, where niche overlap increases while fitness differences decreases. Therefore, persistence properties cannot indicate the dominant mechanism that promotes coexistence and vice versa. Cross correlations between abundance time series are shown to provide a decent characterization of the mechanisms that promote coexistence. The relevance of these insights to the analysis of diverse assemblages is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":501264,"journal":{"name":"The American Naturalist","volume":" ","pages":"E160-E173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Characteristics of Stabilizing and Equalizing Mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Robert West,&nbsp;Nadav M Shnerb\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/720665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractAn understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate coexistence in ecological communities poses a major challenge to theoretical ecology. A popular paradigmatic scheme distinguishes between two qualitatively different processes that help species to coexist: stabilizing mechanisms increase niche differentiation, making the intraspecific competition stronger than the interspecific one, while equalizing mechanisms diminish fitness differences, making the competition less decisive. Here, we provide an analytic and numeric examination of the quantitative features associated with this scheme for a simple, two-species competition model. We show that the main metrics of persistence change only slightly along the stabilizing-equalizing continuum, where niche overlap increases while fitness differences decreases. Therefore, persistence properties cannot indicate the dominant mechanism that promotes coexistence and vice versa. Cross correlations between abundance time series are shown to provide a decent characterization of the mechanisms that promote coexistence. The relevance of these insights to the analysis of diverse assemblages is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E160-E173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/720665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要理解促进生态群落共存的机制对理论生态学提出了重大挑战。一种流行的范式方案区分了两种有助于物种共存的质量不同的过程:稳定机制增加了生态位分化,使种内竞争强于种间竞争,而均衡机制减少了适合度差异,使竞争不那么决定性。在这里,我们为一个简单的两种竞争模型提供了与该方案相关的定量特征的分析和数值检验。结果表明,生态位重叠增加,适应度差异减小,在稳定-平衡连续统中,持久性的主要指标变化不大。因此,持久性属性不能指示促进共存的主要机制,反之亦然。丰度时间序列之间的相互关系可以很好地描述促进共存的机制。讨论了这些见解与分析不同组合的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Characteristics of Stabilizing and Equalizing Mechanisms.

AbstractAn understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate coexistence in ecological communities poses a major challenge to theoretical ecology. A popular paradigmatic scheme distinguishes between two qualitatively different processes that help species to coexist: stabilizing mechanisms increase niche differentiation, making the intraspecific competition stronger than the interspecific one, while equalizing mechanisms diminish fitness differences, making the competition less decisive. Here, we provide an analytic and numeric examination of the quantitative features associated with this scheme for a simple, two-species competition model. We show that the main metrics of persistence change only slightly along the stabilizing-equalizing continuum, where niche overlap increases while fitness differences decreases. Therefore, persistence properties cannot indicate the dominant mechanism that promotes coexistence and vice versa. Cross correlations between abundance time series are shown to provide a decent characterization of the mechanisms that promote coexistence. The relevance of these insights to the analysis of diverse assemblages is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信