接受家庭护理的加拿大老年人的艰难决定,以及为什么他们如此困难:基于网络的决策需求评估。

MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2022-09-16 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683221124090
Alfred Kodjo Toi, Ali Ben Charif, Claudia Lai, Gérard Ngueta, Karine V Plourde, Dawn Stacey, France Légaré
{"title":"接受家庭护理的加拿大老年人的艰难决定,以及为什么他们如此困难:基于网络的决策需求评估。","authors":"Alfred Kodjo Toi,&nbsp;Ali Ben Charif,&nbsp;Claudia Lai,&nbsp;Gérard Ngueta,&nbsp;Karine V Plourde,&nbsp;Dawn Stacey,&nbsp;France Légaré","doi":"10.1177/23814683221124090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Older adults receiving home care services often face decisions related to aging, illness, and loss of autonomy. To inform tailored shared decision making interventions, we assessed their decisional needs by asking about the most common difficult decisions, measured associated decisional conflict, and identified factors associated with it. <b>Methods.</b> In March 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a pan-Canadian Web-based panel of older adults (≥65 y) receiving home care services. For a difficult decision they had faced in the past year, we evaluated clinically significant decisional conflict (CSDC) using the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (score 0-100) with a >37.5 cutoff. To identify factors associated with CSDC, we performed descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses using the stepwise selection method with an assumed entry and exit significance level of 0.15 and 0.20, respectively. Final model selection was based on the Bayesian information criterion. <b>Results.</b> Among 460 participants with an average age of 72.5 y, difficult decisions were, in order of frequency, about housing and safety (57.2%), managing health conditions (21.8%), and end-of-life care (8.3%). CSDC was experienced by 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%) of respondents on all decision points. Factors associated with CSDC included household size = 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33]; <i>P</i> = 0.27), household size = 3 (2.66 [0.78, 8.98]; <i>P</i> = 0.83), and household size = 4 (6.91 [2.23, 21.39]; <i>P</i> = 0.014); preferred option not matching the decision made (4.05 [2.05, 7.97]; <i>P</i> < 0.001); passive role in decision making (5.13 [1.78, 14.77]; <i>P</i> = 0.002); and lower quality of life (0.70 [0.57, 0.87]; <i>P</i><0.001). <b>Discussion.</b> Some older adults receiving home care services in Canada experience CSDC when facing difficult decisions. Shared decision-making interventions could mitigate associated factors.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This is the first study in Canada to assess the decisional needs of older adults receiving care at home and to identify their most common difficult decisions.Difficult decisions most frequently made were about housing and safety. The most significant decisional conflict was experienced by people making decisions about palliative care.When their quality-of-life score was low, older adults experienced clinically significant decision conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683221124090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/11/10.1177_23814683221124090.PMC9483974.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Alfred Kodjo Toi,&nbsp;Ali Ben Charif,&nbsp;Claudia Lai,&nbsp;Gérard Ngueta,&nbsp;Karine V Plourde,&nbsp;Dawn Stacey,&nbsp;France Légaré\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683221124090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Older adults receiving home care services often face decisions related to aging, illness, and loss of autonomy. To inform tailored shared decision making interventions, we assessed their decisional needs by asking about the most common difficult decisions, measured associated decisional conflict, and identified factors associated with it. <b>Methods.</b> In March 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a pan-Canadian Web-based panel of older adults (≥65 y) receiving home care services. For a difficult decision they had faced in the past year, we evaluated clinically significant decisional conflict (CSDC) using the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (score 0-100) with a >37.5 cutoff. To identify factors associated with CSDC, we performed descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses using the stepwise selection method with an assumed entry and exit significance level of 0.15 and 0.20, respectively. Final model selection was based on the Bayesian information criterion. <b>Results.</b> Among 460 participants with an average age of 72.5 y, difficult decisions were, in order of frequency, about housing and safety (57.2%), managing health conditions (21.8%), and end-of-life care (8.3%). CSDC was experienced by 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%) of respondents on all decision points. Factors associated with CSDC included household size = 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33]; <i>P</i> = 0.27), household size = 3 (2.66 [0.78, 8.98]; <i>P</i> = 0.83), and household size = 4 (6.91 [2.23, 21.39]; <i>P</i> = 0.014); preferred option not matching the decision made (4.05 [2.05, 7.97]; <i>P</i> < 0.001); passive role in decision making (5.13 [1.78, 14.77]; <i>P</i> = 0.002); and lower quality of life (0.70 [0.57, 0.87]; <i>P</i><0.001). <b>Discussion.</b> Some older adults receiving home care services in Canada experience CSDC when facing difficult decisions. Shared decision-making interventions could mitigate associated factors.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This is the first study in Canada to assess the decisional needs of older adults receiving care at home and to identify their most common difficult decisions.Difficult decisions most frequently made were about housing and safety. The most significant decisional conflict was experienced by people making decisions about palliative care.When their quality-of-life score was low, older adults experienced clinically significant decision conflict.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23814683221124090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/11/10.1177_23814683221124090.PMC9483974.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221124090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221124090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景。接受家庭护理服务的老年人经常面临与衰老、疾病和丧失自主权有关的决定。为了提供量身定制的共享决策干预措施,我们通过询问最常见的困难决策来评估他们的决策需求,测量相关的决策冲突,并确定与之相关的因素。方法。2020年3月,我们对接受家庭护理服务的老年人(≥65岁)的泛加拿大网络小组进行了一项横断面调查。对于他们在过去一年中面临的困难决策,我们使用16项决策冲突量表(得分0-100)评估临床重大决策冲突(CSDC),截止分值>37.5。为了确定与CSDC相关的因素,我们使用逐步选择方法进行了描述性、双变量和多变量分析,假设进入和退出显著性水平分别为0.15和0.20。最后根据贝叶斯信息准则进行模型选择。结果。在460名平均年龄为72.5岁的参与者中,困难的决定按频率排序是关于住房和安全(57.2%)、管理健康状况(21.8%)和临终关怀(8.3%)。在所有决策点上,14.6%(95%置信区间[CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%)的受访者经历了CSDC。与CSDC相关的因素包括:家庭规模= 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33];P = 0.27),家庭规模= 3 (2.66 [0.78,8.98];P = 0.83),家庭规模= 4 (6.91 [2.23,21.39];P = 0.014);优选方案与决策不匹配(4.05 [2.05,7.97];P < 0.001);被动决策(5.13 [1.78,14.77];P = 0.002);生活质量较低(0.70 [0.57,0.87];PDiscussion。在加拿大,一些接受家庭护理服务的老年人在面临困难的决定时经历了CSDC。共同决策干预可以减轻相关因素。重点:这是加拿大第一个评估在家接受护理的老年人的决策需求并确定他们最常见的困难决策的研究。最常做出的艰难决定是关于住房和安全的。最重要的决策冲突是人们在做关于姑息治疗的决定时所经历的。当他们的生活质量得分较低时,老年人会经历临床上显著的决策冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.

Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.

Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.

Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.

Background. Older adults receiving home care services often face decisions related to aging, illness, and loss of autonomy. To inform tailored shared decision making interventions, we assessed their decisional needs by asking about the most common difficult decisions, measured associated decisional conflict, and identified factors associated with it. Methods. In March 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a pan-Canadian Web-based panel of older adults (≥65 y) receiving home care services. For a difficult decision they had faced in the past year, we evaluated clinically significant decisional conflict (CSDC) using the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (score 0-100) with a >37.5 cutoff. To identify factors associated with CSDC, we performed descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses using the stepwise selection method with an assumed entry and exit significance level of 0.15 and 0.20, respectively. Final model selection was based on the Bayesian information criterion. Results. Among 460 participants with an average age of 72.5 y, difficult decisions were, in order of frequency, about housing and safety (57.2%), managing health conditions (21.8%), and end-of-life care (8.3%). CSDC was experienced by 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%) of respondents on all decision points. Factors associated with CSDC included household size = 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33]; P = 0.27), household size = 3 (2.66 [0.78, 8.98]; P = 0.83), and household size = 4 (6.91 [2.23, 21.39]; P = 0.014); preferred option not matching the decision made (4.05 [2.05, 7.97]; P < 0.001); passive role in decision making (5.13 [1.78, 14.77]; P = 0.002); and lower quality of life (0.70 [0.57, 0.87]; P<0.001). Discussion. Some older adults receiving home care services in Canada experience CSDC when facing difficult decisions. Shared decision-making interventions could mitigate associated factors.

Highlights: This is the first study in Canada to assess the decisional needs of older adults receiving care at home and to identify their most common difficult decisions.Difficult decisions most frequently made were about housing and safety. The most significant decisional conflict was experienced by people making decisions about palliative care.When their quality-of-life score was low, older adults experienced clinically significant decision conflict.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信