预测早发新生儿败血症在脐带血分析:综合评价。

Marco Otilio Rodrigues Wilde, Tatiana Mezadri, Pollyana Bortholazzi Gouveia, Luciane Peter Grillo, Cristina Valete
{"title":"预测早发新生儿败血症在脐带血分析:综合评价。","authors":"Marco Otilio Rodrigues Wilde,&nbsp;Tatiana Mezadri,&nbsp;Pollyana Bortholazzi Gouveia,&nbsp;Luciane Peter Grillo,&nbsp;Cristina Valete","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2022.2122798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the inflammatory markers studied in umbilical cord blood and to analyze the performance of the three markers most frequently studied for the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>An integrative review from 1995 to 2021 was performed, with a search in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and gray literature databases, using the terms \"neonates,\" \"newborns,\" \"neonatal sepsis,\" \"early-onset neonatal sepsis,\" \"neonatal infection,\" \"inflammatory markers,\" \"biomarkers,\" \"cord blood,\" \"fetal blood.\"</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extractions: </strong>Study evaluation was limited to primary studies, prospective, observational or intervention, descriptive or analytical, that assessed the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis using inflammatory markers in umbilical cord blood, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Qualitative studies, reports, review studies, and case series were excluded. Only studies with a punctuation ≥ 6 in the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were included.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were the most frequently studied markers. The best performance for C-reactive protein was observed at a 0.2 mg/L cutoff, with a sensitivity of 82% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Procalcitonin presented the best performance at a 0.5 ng/mL cutoff with 87.5% sensitivity and 98.7% negative predictive value. Interleukin-6 presented the best performance at a 108.5 ng/mL cutoff, with 95% sensitivity and 97.4% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of markers in the umbilical cord for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis, could contribute to a more assertive therapy for the neonate and anticipate sepsis screening. Since the cost is less and technically easier, C-reactive protein is recommended for routine use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"10187-10198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in umbilical cord blood analysis: an integrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Otilio Rodrigues Wilde,&nbsp;Tatiana Mezadri,&nbsp;Pollyana Bortholazzi Gouveia,&nbsp;Luciane Peter Grillo,&nbsp;Cristina Valete\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2022.2122798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the inflammatory markers studied in umbilical cord blood and to analyze the performance of the three markers most frequently studied for the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>An integrative review from 1995 to 2021 was performed, with a search in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and gray literature databases, using the terms \\\"neonates,\\\" \\\"newborns,\\\" \\\"neonatal sepsis,\\\" \\\"early-onset neonatal sepsis,\\\" \\\"neonatal infection,\\\" \\\"inflammatory markers,\\\" \\\"biomarkers,\\\" \\\"cord blood,\\\" \\\"fetal blood.\\\"</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extractions: </strong>Study evaluation was limited to primary studies, prospective, observational or intervention, descriptive or analytical, that assessed the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis using inflammatory markers in umbilical cord blood, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Qualitative studies, reports, review studies, and case series were excluded. Only studies with a punctuation ≥ 6 in the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were included.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were the most frequently studied markers. The best performance for C-reactive protein was observed at a 0.2 mg/L cutoff, with a sensitivity of 82% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Procalcitonin presented the best performance at a 0.5 ng/mL cutoff with 87.5% sensitivity and 98.7% negative predictive value. Interleukin-6 presented the best performance at a 108.5 ng/mL cutoff, with 95% sensitivity and 97.4% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of markers in the umbilical cord for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis, could contribute to a more assertive therapy for the neonate and anticipate sepsis screening. Since the cost is less and technically easier, C-reactive protein is recommended for routine use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10187-10198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2122798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2122798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是描述脐带血中研究的炎症标志物,并分析三种最常用于预测早发性新生儿脓毒症的标志物的性能。数据来源:从1995年到2021年进行了一项综合回顾,在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、SciELO和灰色文献数据库中进行了搜索,使用术语“新生儿”、“新生儿”、“新生儿败血症”、“早发新生儿败血症”、“新生儿感染”、“炎症标志物”、“生物标志物”、“脐带血”、“胎儿血”。研究选择和数据提取:研究评价仅限于前瞻性、观察性或干预性、描述性或分析性的初步研究,这些研究使用葡萄牙语、英语或西班牙语的脐带血炎症标志物评估早发性新生儿败血症的诊断。定性研究、报告、回顾研究和病例系列被排除在外。仅包括纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表中标点符号≥6的研究。与患者护理和临床实践的相关性:定性综合纳入了16项研究。降钙素原、c反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6是最常被研究的标志物。检测c反应蛋白的最佳效果为0.2 mg/L,灵敏度为82%,阴性预测值为99%。降钙素原在0.5 ng/mL时表现最佳,敏感性为87.5%,阴性预测值为98.7%。白细胞介素-6在108.5 ng/mL时表现最佳,灵敏度为95%,阴性预测值为97.4%。结论:评估脐带标志物对早发性新生儿脓毒症的诊断,有助于对新生儿进行更坚定的治疗,并预测脓毒症筛查。由于成本更低,技术上更容易,c反应蛋白被推荐作为常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in umbilical cord blood analysis: an integrative review.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the inflammatory markers studied in umbilical cord blood and to analyze the performance of the three markers most frequently studied for the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis.

Data sources: An integrative review from 1995 to 2021 was performed, with a search in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and gray literature databases, using the terms "neonates," "newborns," "neonatal sepsis," "early-onset neonatal sepsis," "neonatal infection," "inflammatory markers," "biomarkers," "cord blood," "fetal blood."

Study selection and data extractions: Study evaluation was limited to primary studies, prospective, observational or intervention, descriptive or analytical, that assessed the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis using inflammatory markers in umbilical cord blood, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Qualitative studies, reports, review studies, and case series were excluded. Only studies with a punctuation ≥ 6 in the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were included.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were the most frequently studied markers. The best performance for C-reactive protein was observed at a 0.2 mg/L cutoff, with a sensitivity of 82% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Procalcitonin presented the best performance at a 0.5 ng/mL cutoff with 87.5% sensitivity and 98.7% negative predictive value. Interleukin-6 presented the best performance at a 108.5 ng/mL cutoff, with 95% sensitivity and 97.4% negative predictive value.

Conclusion: The evaluation of markers in the umbilical cord for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis, could contribute to a more assertive therapy for the neonate and anticipate sepsis screening. Since the cost is less and technically easier, C-reactive protein is recommended for routine use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信