在结构化硬膜外教学模式后,经验不足的受训者获得腰椎硬膜外阻滞能力:CUSUM学习曲线的随机、单盲、前瞻性比较。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1738783
Marco Scorzoni, Gian Luigi Gonnella, Emanuele Capogna, Matteo Velardo, Pietro Paolo Giuri, Mariano Ciancia, Giorgio Capogna, Gaetano Draisci
{"title":"在结构化硬膜外教学模式后,经验不足的受训者获得腰椎硬膜外阻滞能力:CUSUM学习曲线的随机、单盲、前瞻性比较。","authors":"Marco Scorzoni,&nbsp;Gian Luigi Gonnella,&nbsp;Emanuele Capogna,&nbsp;Matteo Velardo,&nbsp;Pietro Paolo Giuri,&nbsp;Mariano Ciancia,&nbsp;Giorgio Capogna,&nbsp;Gaetano Draisci","doi":"10.1155/2022/1738783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to investigate whether the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may affect the learning curve for lumbar epidural block in novice trainees when compared with a standard teaching module.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a paucity of literature regarding the efficacy of teaching epidural blocks and comparisons between the different educational approaches.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-four PGY3 anesthesia trainees were randomized to receive (study group) or to not receive (control group) the SDM (structured didactic model) before the beginning of their 6 months clinical practice rotation in labor and delivery suites. A CUSUM learning curve was built for every trainee. The scores were assigned by the staff instructor, who was unaware of the group to which the trainee belonged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of subjects who achieved an improvement in performance was 8 trainees from the control group and 14 from the study group. The probability of achieving an improvement was higher (<i>p</i> < 05) in the study group than in the control group, with an aOR of 3.25 (CI: 1.01; 12.1). The proportion of subjects in the study group who completed the epidural without help was 1.21 (1.05-1.41) times the proportion of subjects who completed the epidural without help in the control group. The probability of completing the epidural block without any assistance was 21% higher in the study group than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have demonstrated that the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may improve the learning curve (CUSUM) for lumbar epidural block in novice, entirely inexperienced, anesthesia trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1738783"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving Lumbar Epidural Block Competency in Inexperienced Trainees after a Structured Epidural Teaching Model: A Randomized, Single Blind, Prospective Comparison of CUSUM Learning Curves.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Scorzoni,&nbsp;Gian Luigi Gonnella,&nbsp;Emanuele Capogna,&nbsp;Matteo Velardo,&nbsp;Pietro Paolo Giuri,&nbsp;Mariano Ciancia,&nbsp;Giorgio Capogna,&nbsp;Gaetano Draisci\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1738783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to investigate whether the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may affect the learning curve for lumbar epidural block in novice trainees when compared with a standard teaching module.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a paucity of literature regarding the efficacy of teaching epidural blocks and comparisons between the different educational approaches.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-four PGY3 anesthesia trainees were randomized to receive (study group) or to not receive (control group) the SDM (structured didactic model) before the beginning of their 6 months clinical practice rotation in labor and delivery suites. A CUSUM learning curve was built for every trainee. The scores were assigned by the staff instructor, who was unaware of the group to which the trainee belonged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of subjects who achieved an improvement in performance was 8 trainees from the control group and 14 from the study group. The probability of achieving an improvement was higher (<i>p</i> < 05) in the study group than in the control group, with an aOR of 3.25 (CI: 1.01; 12.1). The proportion of subjects in the study group who completed the epidural without help was 1.21 (1.05-1.41) times the proportion of subjects who completed the epidural without help in the control group. The probability of completing the epidural block without any assistance was 21% higher in the study group than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have demonstrated that the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may improve the learning curve (CUSUM) for lumbar epidural block in novice, entirely inexperienced, anesthesia trainees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1738783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1738783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1738783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项随机、前瞻性研究的目的是调查与标准教学模块相比,结构化硬膜外教学模型(SETM)的使用是否会影响新学员腰椎硬膜外阻滞的学习曲线。关于硬膜外阻滞教学的有效性和不同教育方法之间的比较,文献很少。方法:将44名PGY3麻醉学员随机分为接受(研究组)和不接受(对照组)SDM(结构化教学模式),然后在产房进行为期6个月的临床实习轮转。为每位学员建立了CUSUM学习曲线。分数是由教官分配的,他不知道学员属于哪一组。结果:对照组有8人,研究组有14人。研究组获得改善的概率高于对照组(p < 0.05), aOR为3.25 (CI: 1.01;12.1)。研究组无帮助完成硬膜外麻醉的比例是对照组无帮助完成硬膜外麻醉比例的1.21(1.05 ~ 1.41)倍。在没有任何辅助的情况下,研究组完成硬膜外阻滞的概率比对照组高21% (p < 0.05)。结论:我们已经证明,使用结构化硬膜外教学模式(SETM)可以改善初学者,完全没有经验的麻醉学员腰硬膜外阻滞的学习曲线(CUSUM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Achieving Lumbar Epidural Block Competency in Inexperienced Trainees after a Structured Epidural Teaching Model: A Randomized, Single Blind, Prospective Comparison of CUSUM Learning Curves.

Achieving Lumbar Epidural Block Competency in Inexperienced Trainees after a Structured Epidural Teaching Model: A Randomized, Single Blind, Prospective Comparison of CUSUM Learning Curves.

Aim: The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to investigate whether the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may affect the learning curve for lumbar epidural block in novice trainees when compared with a standard teaching module.

Introduction: There is a paucity of literature regarding the efficacy of teaching epidural blocks and comparisons between the different educational approaches.

Method: Forty-four PGY3 anesthesia trainees were randomized to receive (study group) or to not receive (control group) the SDM (structured didactic model) before the beginning of their 6 months clinical practice rotation in labor and delivery suites. A CUSUM learning curve was built for every trainee. The scores were assigned by the staff instructor, who was unaware of the group to which the trainee belonged.

Results: The number of subjects who achieved an improvement in performance was 8 trainees from the control group and 14 from the study group. The probability of achieving an improvement was higher (p < 05) in the study group than in the control group, with an aOR of 3.25 (CI: 1.01; 12.1). The proportion of subjects in the study group who completed the epidural without help was 1.21 (1.05-1.41) times the proportion of subjects who completed the epidural without help in the control group. The probability of completing the epidural block without any assistance was 21% higher in the study group than in the control group (p < 05).

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the use of the structured epidural teaching model (SETM) may improve the learning curve (CUSUM) for lumbar epidural block in novice, entirely inexperienced, anesthesia trainees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信