表观扩散系数(ADC)在局部晚期宫颈癌患者淋巴结状态评估中的作用:我们的经验和回顾。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-08-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.118914
Benedetta Gui, Luca Russo, Laura Minordi, Maura Miccò, Salvatore Persiani, Giacomo Avesani, Vittoria Rufini, Valentina Fuoco, Rosa Autorino, Gabriella Ferrandina, Giovanni Scambia, Riccardo Manfredi
{"title":"表观扩散系数(ADC)在局部晚期宫颈癌患者淋巴结状态评估中的作用:我们的经验和回顾。","authors":"Benedetta Gui,&nbsp;Luca Russo,&nbsp;Laura Minordi,&nbsp;Maura Miccò,&nbsp;Salvatore Persiani,&nbsp;Giacomo Avesani,&nbsp;Vittoria Rufini,&nbsp;Valentina Fuoco,&nbsp;Rosa Autorino,&nbsp;Gabriella Ferrandina,&nbsp;Giovanni Scambia,&nbsp;Riccardo Manfredi","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.118914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams of patients with LACC were retrospectively eva-luated. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of enlarged LNs were measured and compared between positron emission tomography (PET)-positive and PET-negative LNs. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test and Student's <i>t</i>-test. ROC curves were generated for each parameter to identify the optimal cut-off value for differentiation of the LNs. A systematic search in the literature was performed, exploring several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 LNs in 34 patients were analysed. The median ADC value of PET-positive LNs (0.907 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [0.780-1.080]) was lower than that in PET-negative LNs (1.275 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [1.063-1.525]) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). rADC and cADC values were lower in PET-positive LNs (rADC: 0.120 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [-0.060-0.270]; cADC: 1.130 [0.980-1.420]) than in PET-negative LNs (rADC: 0.435 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [0.225-0.673]; cADC: 1.615 [1.210-1.993]) LNs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ADC showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.808).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mean ADC, rADC, and cADC were significantly lower in the PET-positive group than in the PET-negative group. The ADC cut-off value of 1.149 × 10-3 mm<sup>2</sup>/s showed the highest sensitivity. These results confirm the usefulness of ADC in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic LNs in LACC.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/27/PJR-87-47671.PMC9453471.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review.\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Gui,&nbsp;Luca Russo,&nbsp;Laura Minordi,&nbsp;Maura Miccò,&nbsp;Salvatore Persiani,&nbsp;Giacomo Avesani,&nbsp;Vittoria Rufini,&nbsp;Valentina Fuoco,&nbsp;Rosa Autorino,&nbsp;Gabriella Ferrandina,&nbsp;Giovanni Scambia,&nbsp;Riccardo Manfredi\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.118914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams of patients with LACC were retrospectively eva-luated. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of enlarged LNs were measured and compared between positron emission tomography (PET)-positive and PET-negative LNs. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test and Student's <i>t</i>-test. ROC curves were generated for each parameter to identify the optimal cut-off value for differentiation of the LNs. A systematic search in the literature was performed, exploring several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 LNs in 34 patients were analysed. The median ADC value of PET-positive LNs (0.907 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [0.780-1.080]) was lower than that in PET-negative LNs (1.275 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [1.063-1.525]) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). rADC and cADC values were lower in PET-positive LNs (rADC: 0.120 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [-0.060-0.270]; cADC: 1.130 [0.980-1.420]) than in PET-negative LNs (rADC: 0.435 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s [0.225-0.673]; cADC: 1.615 [1.210-1.993]) LNs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ADC showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.808).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mean ADC, rADC, and cADC were significantly lower in the PET-positive group than in the PET-negative group. The ADC cut-off value of 1.149 × 10-3 mm<sup>2</sup>/s showed the highest sensitivity. These results confirm the usefulness of ADC in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic LNs in LACC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/27/PJR-87-47671.PMC9453471.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价表观弥散系数(ADC)值测定在局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者的后静态淋巴结(LNs)诊断中的作用,并对相关文献进行系统回顾。材料与方法:回顾性分析LACC患者的磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果。测量放大LNs的平均ADC、相对ADC (rADC)和正确ADC (cADC)值,并比较正电子发射断层扫描(PET)阳性和PET阴性LNs之间的差异。采用Mann-Whitney u检验和Student’st检验进行比较。为每个参数生成ROC曲线,以确定区分LNs的最佳截止值。对文献进行了系统的检索,探索了几个数据库,包括PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和Embase。结果:共分析34例患者的105例ln。pet阳性LNs的中位ADC值(0.907 × 10-3 mm2/s[0.780 ~ 1.080])低于pet阴性LNs的中位ADC值(1.275 × 10-3 mm2/s [1.063 ~ 1.525]) (p < 0.05)。pet阳性LNs的rADC和cADC值较低(rADC: 0.120 × 10-3 mm2/s [-0.060-0.270];rADC: 0.435 × 10-3 mm2/s [0.225-0.673];cADC: 1.615 [1.210 ~ 1.993]), p < 0.05。ADC曲线下面积最高(AUC 0.808)。结论:pet阳性组ADC、rADC、cADC均值明显低于pet阴性组。ADC截止值为1.149 × 10-3 mm2/s,灵敏度最高。这些结果证实了ADC在鉴别LACC的转移性和非转移性LNs中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature.

Material and methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams of patients with LACC were retrospectively eva-luated. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of enlarged LNs were measured and compared between positron emission tomography (PET)-positive and PET-negative LNs. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Student's t-test. ROC curves were generated for each parameter to identify the optimal cut-off value for differentiation of the LNs. A systematic search in the literature was performed, exploring several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase.

Results: A total of 105 LNs in 34 patients were analysed. The median ADC value of PET-positive LNs (0.907 × 10-3 mm2/s [0.780-1.080]) was lower than that in PET-negative LNs (1.275 × 10-3 mm2/s [1.063-1.525]) (p < 0.05). rADC and cADC values were lower in PET-positive LNs (rADC: 0.120 × 10-3 mm2/s [-0.060-0.270]; cADC: 1.130 [0.980-1.420]) than in PET-negative LNs (rADC: 0.435 × 10-3 mm2/s [0.225-0.673]; cADC: 1.615 [1.210-1.993]) LNs (p < 0.05). ADC showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.808).

Conclusions: Mean ADC, rADC, and cADC were significantly lower in the PET-positive group than in the PET-negative group. The ADC cut-off value of 1.149 × 10-3 mm2/s showed the highest sensitivity. These results confirm the usefulness of ADC in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic LNs in LACC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信