紧急情况下的不良反应监测(MONKEY)——对住院请求被拒绝的急诊患者处理结果的审计。

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S376419
Wendell Zhang, Lee Yung Wong, Jasmine Liu, Soham Sarkar
{"title":"紧急情况下的不良反应监测(MONKEY)——对住院请求被拒绝的急诊患者处理结果的审计。","authors":"Wendell Zhang,&nbsp;Lee Yung Wong,&nbsp;Jasmine Liu,&nbsp;Soham Sarkar","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S376419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected - which study investigators termed a \"knockback\".</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify disposition outcomes and referral accuracy in ED patients whose admission referral was initially rejected. Secondary objectives were to identify additional patient, clinician and systemic factors associated with knockbacks.</p><p><strong>Selection and methodology: </strong>Emergency clinicians prospectively nominated a convenience sample of patients identified as having knockbacks over two time periods (Jan-Feb 2020 and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021) at a tertiary Australian ED. Data were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach and subsequent descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 patients were identified as knockbacks. The referrals were warranted, with 89.0% of cases (n = 97) ultimately requiring a hospital admission. In 60.6% (n = 66) of the admissions, patients were admitted under the inpatient team initially referred to by the ED, suggesting referrals were generally accurate. The number of in-hospital units involved in the admission process and ED length of stay were positively correlated (0.409, p < 0.001). Patient factors associated with knockbacks include pre-existing chronic medical conditions and presenting acutely unwell. Analysis of clinicians' perspectives yielded recurring themes of disagreements over admission destination and diagnostic uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this patient sample, emergency referrals for admission were mostly warranted and accurate. Knockbacks increase ED length of stay and may adversely affect patient care. Further focused discussion and clearer referral guidelines between ED clinicians and their inpatient colleagues are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/a6/oaem-14-481.PMC9448349.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) - An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests.\",\"authors\":\"Wendell Zhang,&nbsp;Lee Yung Wong,&nbsp;Jasmine Liu,&nbsp;Soham Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S376419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected - which study investigators termed a \\\"knockback\\\".</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify disposition outcomes and referral accuracy in ED patients whose admission referral was initially rejected. Secondary objectives were to identify additional patient, clinician and systemic factors associated with knockbacks.</p><p><strong>Selection and methodology: </strong>Emergency clinicians prospectively nominated a convenience sample of patients identified as having knockbacks over two time periods (Jan-Feb 2020 and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021) at a tertiary Australian ED. Data were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach and subsequent descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 patients were identified as knockbacks. The referrals were warranted, with 89.0% of cases (n = 97) ultimately requiring a hospital admission. In 60.6% (n = 66) of the admissions, patients were admitted under the inpatient team initially referred to by the ED, suggesting referrals were generally accurate. The number of in-hospital units involved in the admission process and ED length of stay were positively correlated (0.409, p < 0.001). Patient factors associated with knockbacks include pre-existing chronic medical conditions and presenting acutely unwell. Analysis of clinicians' perspectives yielded recurring themes of disagreements over admission destination and diagnostic uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this patient sample, emergency referrals for admission were mostly warranted and accurate. Knockbacks increase ED length of stay and may adversely affect patient care. Further focused discussion and clearer referral guidelines between ED clinicians and their inpatient colleagues are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/a6/oaem-14-481.PMC9448349.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S376419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S376419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)临床医生在将患者转介到住院部住院时通常会遇到困难。关于这些复杂转诊后患者结果的文献报道有限,其中急诊科的住院请求被拒绝-研究人员称之为“击退”。目的:确定入院转诊最初被拒绝的急诊科患者的处置结果和转诊准确性。次要目标是确定与反抗性相关的其他患者、临床医生和全身因素。选择和方法:急诊临床医生前瞻性地在澳大利亚一家三级急诊科提名了两个时间段(2020年1月至2月和2020年8月至2021年1月)被确定为击退的患者的方便样本。采用混合方法分析数据,随后进行描述性和专题分析。结果:共有109例患者被确定为逆转录。转诊是有根据的,89.0%的病例(n = 97)最终需要住院。在60.6% (n = 66)的入院患者中,患者是在最初由急诊科转介的住院小组下入院的,这表明转介总体上是准确的。住院单位数与急诊科住院时间呈正相关(0.409,p < 0.001)。与抗退反应相关的患者因素包括先前存在的慢性疾病和急性不适。临床医生的观点分析产生了反复出现的关于入院目的地和诊断不确定性的分歧主题。结论:在该患者样本中,急诊转介入院大多是合理和准确的。回退会增加急诊科的住院时间,并可能对患者护理产生不利影响。急诊科医生和他们的住院同事之间需要进一步集中讨论和更明确的转诊指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) - An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests.

MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) - An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests.

MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) - An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests.

Background: Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected - which study investigators termed a "knockback".

Purpose: To identify disposition outcomes and referral accuracy in ED patients whose admission referral was initially rejected. Secondary objectives were to identify additional patient, clinician and systemic factors associated with knockbacks.

Selection and methodology: Emergency clinicians prospectively nominated a convenience sample of patients identified as having knockbacks over two time periods (Jan-Feb 2020 and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021) at a tertiary Australian ED. Data were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach and subsequent descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 109 patients were identified as knockbacks. The referrals were warranted, with 89.0% of cases (n = 97) ultimately requiring a hospital admission. In 60.6% (n = 66) of the admissions, patients were admitted under the inpatient team initially referred to by the ED, suggesting referrals were generally accurate. The number of in-hospital units involved in the admission process and ED length of stay were positively correlated (0.409, p < 0.001). Patient factors associated with knockbacks include pre-existing chronic medical conditions and presenting acutely unwell. Analysis of clinicians' perspectives yielded recurring themes of disagreements over admission destination and diagnostic uncertainty.

Conclusion: In this patient sample, emergency referrals for admission were mostly warranted and accurate. Knockbacks increase ED length of stay and may adversely affect patient care. Further focused discussion and clearer referral guidelines between ED clinicians and their inpatient colleagues are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信